Alabama vs Colorado
Federal spending comparison
Colorado holds $8,052,957,089 in federal obligations on USAspending.gov. Alabama holds $7,682,295,934. The stacked gap is about $371 million. Census counts are close as well: 5,957,493 in Colorado and 5,157,699 in Alabama. Spending per capita is $97.34 versus $116.81. The files diverge on rows. Alabama logs 161,254 awards; Colorado logs 91,723. FY2026 obligations are $602.5M in Alabama and $579.9M in Colorado, a recency window that is nearly tied.
Key figures
- Colorado $8.1B vs Alabama $7.7B in USAspending obligations — a modest stacked gap.
- Populations: Alabama 5,157,699 vs Colorado 5,957,493; per capita $116.81 vs $97.34.
- Alabama has more awards (161,254 vs 91,723); FY2026 nearly even at $602.5M vs $579.9M.
- Top industries: commercial and institutional building construction (AL) vs nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation (CO).
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Two mid-size states, one thinner award file
These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Colorado’s $8.1B stock sits $371 million above Alabama’s $7.7B. Place of performance in the award file is the scoring rule. Populations of 5,957,493 and 5,157,699 put both states in a similar size band. The comparison is not a giant-versus-small contest on people or on stacked dollars.
Award counts break the resemblance. Alabama’s 161,254 actions exceed Colorado’s 91,723. Alabama’s $7.7B is spread across more records. Colorado’s $8.1B sits on a thinner file, which implies a heavier typical booking. Dollars and people are close; paperwork volume is not.
Alabama and Colorado sit in the same Census band (5,157,699 vs 5,957,493) and the same $8 billion band ($7,682,295,934 vs $8,052,957,089). They do not sit in the same paperwork band: 161,254 awards versus 91,723. FY2026 of $602,489,799 versus $579,929,386 is nearly even. Per capita of $116.81 versus $97.34 is the quieter intensity split. Building construction versus chartered freight air is mix.
Intensity: $116.81 in Alabama, $97.34 in Colorado
Alabama’s smaller Census count of 5,157,699 against $7,682,295,934 produces $116.81 per capita. Colorado’s 5,957,493 residents against $8,052,957,089 produce $97.34. Intensity favors Alabama by about $19 per person even though Colorado holds the larger stacked total.
A $116.81 per-person reading is an intensity fact attached to $7.7B, not a transfer to each resident. Colorado’s $97.34 is attached to $8.1B. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not state GDP. Similar populations can still hide a 70,000-award gap and a quieter intensity split.
Full analysis: Alabama vs Colorado on USAspending: $7.7B vs $8.1B →
Questions
- Which state has more federal spending, Alabama or Colorado?
- Colorado leads in stacked USAspending.gov obligations: $8,052,957,089 versus Alabama’s $7,682,295,934. Alabama has more awards (161,254 vs 91,723). Populations are close (5,157,699 vs 5,957,493). Spending per capita is $116.81 in Alabama and $97.34 in Colorado. FY2026 obligations are $602.5M and $579.9M. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.
- Do Alabama and Colorado have similar federal award counts?
- No. Alabama logs 161,254 awards on $7.7B. Colorado logs 91,723 awards on $8.1B. Colorado’s thinner file implies a heavier typical booking. Per capita is $116.81 versus $97.34. Populations are 5,157,699 and 5,957,493. FY2026 is nearly even ($602.5M vs $579.9M).
- What industries lead Alabama and Colorado federal awards?
- Alabama’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Colorado’s is nonscheduled chartered freight air transportation. Those slices sit on $7.7B and $8.1B obligation stocks. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award in either state. Award counts are 161,254 in Alabama and 91,723 in Colorado.
- Are Alabama vs Colorado figures Treasury outlays?
- No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $7.7B and $8.1B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $602.5M and $579.9M measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
Top Agencies — Alabama
- Department of Defense$125.69B
- Social Security Administration$69.72B
- Department of Health and Human Services$46.27B
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration$19.27B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$13.75B
Top Agencies — Colorado
- Department of Defense$63.98B
- Social Security Administration$61.96B
- Department of Health and Human Services$57.66B
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration$22.31B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$15.38B
Top Industries — Alabama
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)$20.73B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES$18.78B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$17.30B
- GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE MANUFACTURING$16.46B
- SHIP BUILDING AND REPAIRING$14.89B
Top Industries — Colorado
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$15.76B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN BIOTECHNOLOGY$10.31B
- NONSCHEDULED CHARTERED FREIGHT AIR TRANSPORTATION$10.08B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$9.18B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)$9.12B
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · Alabama · Colorado