Skip to main content

Arizona vs Massachusetts

Federal spending comparison

Massachusetts accounts for $13.5B in federal obligations on USAspending.gov. Arizona accounts for $13.1B. The stacked totals are nearly matched. Arizona has 7,582,384 residents against Massachusetts’s 7,136,171, and spending per capita runs $435.71 versus $364.70. Massachusetts logs 294,824 awards against Arizona’s 118,504. FY2026 favors Arizona: $3.3B versus Massachusetts’s $2.6B.

Key figures

  • Massachusetts $13.5B vs Arizona $13.1B in USAspending obligations — a close stacked ranking.
  • Populations: Arizona 7,582,384 vs Massachusetts 7,136,171; per capita $435.71 vs $364.70.
  • Massachusetts has more awards (294,824 vs 118,504); FY2026 $3.3B vs $2.6B favors Arizona.
  • Top industries: direct health and medical insurance carriers (AZ) vs aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing (MA).
  • Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Nearly matched stocks: $13.1B versus $13.5B

These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Massachusetts’s $13.5B edges Arizona’s $13.1B by a thin margin. The comparison scores place of performance in the award file. Among two states with similar Census counts, the stacked ranking is close enough that other cuts — rows, intensity, recency — do more work than the dollar lead.

Award counts are not close. Massachusetts has 294,824 awards; Arizona has 118,504. Massachusetts’s file is busier in rows on a dollar stock that is only modestly larger. Arizona’s $13.1B on 118,504 actions implies a heavier typical booking than Massachusetts’s $13.5B spread across 294,824 records.

Arizona’s $435.71 versus Massachusetts’s $364.70

Arizona’s 7,582,384 residents and Massachusetts’s 7,136,171 residents sit in the same band. After dividing the obligation stocks by those Census counts, Arizona shows $435.71 per capita and Massachusetts shows $364.70. Intensity favors Arizona even though Massachusetts holds the slightly larger $13.5B stock.

A $435.71 per-person reading in Arizona on 7,582,384 residents is an intensity fact attached to $13.1B. Massachusetts’s $364.70 on 7,136,171 residents is attached to $13.5B. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not GDP. Two similar populations do not produce identical files.

Full analysis: Arizona vs Massachusetts on USAspending: $13.1B vs $13.5B

Questions

Which state has more federal spending, Arizona or Massachusetts?
Massachusetts leads slightly in stacked USAspending.gov obligations: $13.5B versus Arizona’s $13.1B. Massachusetts has more awards (294,824 vs 118,504). Arizona has more people (7,582,384 vs 7,136,171). Spending per capita is $435.71 in Arizona and $364.70 in Massachusetts. FY2026 obligations are $3.3B in Arizona and $2.6B in Massachusetts. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Are Arizona and Massachusetts similar in federal obligations?
The stacked totals are close ($13.1B vs $13.5B) and the Census counts are close (7,582,384 vs 7,136,171). Award counts are not: 118,504 in Arizona versus 294,824 in Massachusetts. Per capita favors Arizona ($435.71 vs $364.70). FY2026 favors Arizona ($3.3B vs $2.6B). Similar stocks can hide different files.
What industries lead Arizona and Massachusetts federal awards?
Arizona’s top industry is direct health and medical insurance carriers. Massachusetts’s is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Those slices sit on $13.1B and $13.5B in obligations. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award in either state. Award counts are 118,504 in Arizona and 294,824 in Massachusetts.
Are Arizona vs Massachusetts figures Treasury outlays?
No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $13.1B and $13.5B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $3.3B and $2.6B measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments. Place of performance can differ from where the paying agency sits.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.

Side-by-side federal spending and demographic comparison between Arizona and Massachusetts.
ArizonaMetricMassachusetts
$52.77BTotal Spending$43.05B
$7KPer Capita$6K
N/A% of GDPN/A
7.6MPopulation7.1M
N/AMedian IncomeN/A
N/APoverty RateN/A
N/ABachelor Degree %N/A
N/AMedian AgeN/A
N/AUnemploymentN/A
N/AGDP (Millions)N/A

Top Agencies — Arizona

  • Department of Health and Human Services$129.02B
  • Department of Defense$128.44B
  • Social Security Administration$94.84B
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$15.43B
  • Department of Education$15.02B

Top Agencies — Massachusetts

  • Department of Health and Human Services$138.54B
  • Department of Defense$112.05B
  • Social Security Administration$86.41B
  • General Services Administration$13.54B
  • Department of Agriculture$11.34B

Top Industries — Arizona

  • GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE MANUFACTURING$47.36B
  • AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$16.36B
  • ENGINEERING SERVICES$8.71B
  • COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$7.27B
  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)$7.22B

Top Industries — Massachusetts

  • SEARCH, DETECTION, NAVIGATION, GUIDANCE, AERONAUTICAL, AND NAUTICAL SYSTEM AND INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURING$30.64B
  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)$17.15B
  • ENGINEERING SERVICES$16.64B
  • AIRCRAFT ENGINE AND ENGINE PARTS MANUFACTURING$7.61B
  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$4.93B