California vs New Mexico
Federal spending comparison
California’s USAspending.gov obligation stock is $39.5B; New Mexico’s is $3.9B. The dollar ranking is not close. The intensity ranking runs the other way, and by a wide margin: New Mexico’s $945.82 per capita on 2,130,256 residents against California’s $135.64 on 39,431,263. Award counts are 19,233 in New Mexico and 639,340 in California. FY2026 obligations are $2.0B in New Mexico and $5.3B in California — New Mexico’s latest-year slice is about half its $3.9B stock. Both states peak in commercial and institutional building construction. These figures are obligations, not outlays.
Key figures
- California $39.5B vs New Mexico $3.9B in stacked USAspending obligations.
- New Mexico leads per capita $945.82 vs California $135.64 on 2,130,256 vs 39,431,263 residents.
- FY2026 $5.3B vs $2.0B — a large New Mexico slice of $3.9B.
- Both peak in commercial construction; New Mexico files only 19,233 awards vs 639,340.
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
The $945.82 reading is the New Mexico fact
New Mexico’s 2,130,256 residents are about 5 percent of California’s 39,431,263. New Mexico’s $3.9B is about 10 percent of California’s $39.5B. That mismatch, on a small Census denominator, is the $945.82 versus $135.64 inversion. New Mexico is a small-population file with a heavy obligation load per resident. California is a large-population file with a cooler load per resident and a much larger stock.
New Mexico files only 19,233 awards against California’s 639,340. The $3.9B is concentrated in few actions. The packet does not publish average award size. The row contrast is enough to flag concentration next to the per-capita outlier.
FY2026 of $2.0B on a $3.9B stock
Fiscal year 2026 obligations are $5.3B in California and $2.0B in New Mexico. New Mexico’s latest-year amount is about half of $3.9B. Recency is doing more work on the New Mexico side than in almost any other California pairing in this slice. California’s $5.3B is a smaller share of $39.5B and remains the larger latest-year figure.
Treat FY2026 as a recency slice of obligations, not Treasury cash. Do not divide $5.3B or $2.0B by 639,340 or 19,233 all-years awards. Spending per capita of $135.64 and $945.82 already uses Census denominators of 39,431,263 and 2,130,256.
Full analysis: California vs New Mexico on USAspending: $39.5B against $3.9B →
Questions
- Does California or New Mexico have more federal spending?
- California leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $39.5B to New Mexico’s $3.9B. New Mexico leads spending per capita, $945.82 versus $135.64, on 2,130,256 residents against California’s 39,431,263. Award counts are 639,340 in California and 19,233 in New Mexico. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B in California and $2.0B in New Mexico.
- Why is New Mexico’s per-capita figure so high?
- The packet reports $945.82 per capita in New Mexico on 2,130,256 residents and $135.64 in California on 39,431,263. New Mexico’s $3.9B stock is small in dollars but heavy relative to its Census count, and FY2026 is $2.0B of that stock. Award counts are 19,233 versus 639,340. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
- Do California and New Mexico have the same lead industry?
- Yes. Both peak in commercial and institutional building construction. Those labels sit on $39.5B in California and $3.9B in New Mexico. Award counts are 639,340 versus 19,233. A shared peak is a mix tag, not evidence that intensity matches. The packet lists USAspending.gov obligations only.
- Are California vs New Mexico figures Treasury outlays?
- No. The $39.5B and $3.9B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $5.3B and $2.0B, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($135.64 vs $945.82) uses Census population where present. Award counts in the packet are all-years totals, not a single fiscal year’s actions.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
| California | Metric | New Mexico |
|---|---|---|
| $222.27B | Total Spending | $19.40B |
| $6K | Per Capita | $9K |
| N/A | % of GDP | N/A |
| 39.4M | Population | 2.1M |
| N/A | Median Income | N/A |
| N/A | Poverty Rate | N/A |
| N/A | Bachelor Degree % | N/A |
| N/A | Median Age | N/A |
| N/A | Unemployment | N/A |
| N/A | GDP (Millions) | N/A |
Top Agencies — California
- Department of Health and Human Services$961.70B
- Social Security Administration$397.49B
- Department of Defense$301.91B
- Department of Energy$116.54B
- Department of Agriculture$85.61B
Top Agencies — New Mexico
- Department of Energy$185.29B
- Department of Health and Human Services$40.14B
- Social Security Administration$27.25B
- Department of Defense$9.29B
- Department of Agriculture$6.62B
Top Industries — California
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$84.92B
- AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$48.92B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$45.14B
- DIRECT HEALTH AND MEDICAL INSURANCE CARRIERS$42.95B
- COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS$37.36B
Top Industries — New Mexico
- FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES$148.95B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$35.52B
- COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$3.50B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$1.69B
- ENGINEERING SERVICES$1.21B
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · California · New Mexico