Skip to main content

California vs Texas

Federal spending comparison

Texas accounts for $72.7B in federal obligations on USAspending.gov. California accounts for $39.5B. That ranking will surprise anyone who assumes the larger Census count always wins the award file. California has 39,431,263 residents; Texas has 31,290,831. Spending per capita is $135.64 in California and $686.10 in Texas. California logs more awards (639,340 vs 530,634) and still trails in dollars. California’s 639,340 awards on $39.5B versus Texas’s 530,634 awards on $72.7B is the inversion: more rows in California, more dollars in Texas, more people in California (39,431,263 vs 31,290,831).

Key figures

  • Texas $72.7B vs California $39.5B in USAspending obligations — Texas leads despite fewer people.
  • Populations: California 39,431,263 vs Texas 31,290,831; per capita $135.64 vs $686.10.
  • California has more awards (639,340 vs 530,634); FY2026 $5.3B vs $21.5B.
  • Top industries: commercial and institutional building construction (CA) vs pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing (TX).
  • Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Texas’s $72.7B outruns California’s $39.5B

These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Texas’s $72.7B is about 1.8 times California’s $39.5B. Among the two most populous states, the award-dollar lead belongs to Texas in this aggregate. That is the first fact to hold before anyone reaches for familiar stories about tech, energy, or defense.

Award counts run the other way. California has 639,340 awards; Texas has 530,634. California’s file is busier in rows and lighter in dollars. Texas’s file is heavier in dollars on fewer actions — a higher typical booking, not merely more paperwork.

More people in California, more dollars per person in Texas

California’s 39,431,263 residents exceed Texas’s 31,290,831. Spending per capita still favors Texas: $686.10 versus $135.64. After dividing $72.7B and $39.5B by those Census counts, Texas remains about five times as intensive. Population is not the engine of this ranking.

A $135.64 per-person reading in California means a huge private economy can coexist with a thinner federal-award intensity than Texas shows at $686.10. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not GDP.

Full analysis: California vs Texas on USAspending: Texas leads $72.7B to $39.5B →

Questions

Which state has more federal spending, California or Texas?
Texas leads in USAspending.gov obligations: $72.7B versus California’s $39.5B. California has more awards (639,340 vs 530,634) and more people (39,431,263 vs 31,290,831). Spending per capita is $135.64 in California and $686.10 in Texas. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B and $21.5B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Why does Texas show more federal obligations than California despite fewer people?
Texas’s $72.7B on 31,290,831 residents produces $686.10 per capita. California’s $39.5B on 39,431,263 residents produces $135.64. Award counts actually favor California (639,340 vs 530,634), so Texas’s lead is dollars per action and intensity, not more rows. Top industries differ: pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing (TX) vs commercial and institutional building construction (CA).
What industries lead California and Texas federal awards?
California’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Texas’s is pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Those slices sit on $39.5B and $72.7B in obligations. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award in either megastate. Those figures remain USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays and not a score of which state deserves more work.
Are California vs Texas figures Treasury outlays?
No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $39.5B and $72.7B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $5.3B and $21.5B measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments. Those figures remain USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays and not a score of which state deserves more work.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.

Side-by-side federal spending and demographic comparison between California and Texas.
CaliforniaMetricTexas
$222.27BTotal Spending$147.74B
$6KPer Capita$5K
N/A% of GDPN/A
39.4MPopulation31.3M
N/AMedian IncomeN/A
N/APoverty RateN/A
N/ABachelor Degree %N/A
N/AMedian AgeN/A
N/AUnemploymentN/A
N/AGDP (Millions)N/A

Top Agencies — California

  • Department of Health and Human Services$961.70B
  • Social Security Administration$397.49B
  • Department of Defense$301.91B
  • Department of Energy$116.54B
  • Department of Agriculture$85.61B

Top Agencies — Texas

  • Department of Defense$483.10B
  • Social Security Administration$284.97B
  • Department of Health and Human Services$218.33B
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$107.92B
  • Department of Homeland Security$55.28B

Top Industries — California

  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$84.92B
  • AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$48.92B
  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$45.14B
  • DIRECT HEALTH AND MEDICAL INSURANCE CARRIERS$42.95B
  • COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES, AND PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS$37.36B

Top Industries — Texas

  • AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$299.18B
  • GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE MANUFACTURING$62.54B
  • OTHER AIRCRAFT PARTS AND AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING$29.46B
  • PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATION MANUFACTURING$29.13B
  • COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$26.71B