Connecticut vs Ohio
Federal spending comparison
Ohio holds $8,141,450,027 in federal obligations on USAspending.gov. Connecticut holds $7,483,687,896. Ohio leads stacked dollars by about $658 million while carrying 11,883,304 residents against Connecticut’s 3,675,069. Spending per capita therefore splits hard: $266.81 in Connecticut against $61.66 in Ohio. Award counts are 94,990 in Connecticut and 168,038 in Ohio. Both files lead with aircraft-related manufacturing—other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment in Connecticut, aircraft engine and engine parts in Ohio.
Key figures
- Ohio $8.1B vs Connecticut $7.5B in USAspending obligations.
- Populations: Connecticut 3,675,069 vs Ohio 11,883,304; per capita $266.81 vs $61.66.
- Ohio has more awards (168,038 vs 94,990); FY2026 favors Connecticut $980.5M vs $732.7M.
- Top industries: other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment (CT) vs aircraft engine and engine parts (OH).
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Aviation cousins with different scale
These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Ohio’s $8.1B stock sits $658 million above Connecticut’s $7.5B. Place of performance in the award file is the scoring rule. The pair is unusual because the top industry labels sit in the same aircraft-manufacturing family even while people, intensity, and rows diverge.
Connecticut logs 94,990 awards on $7.5B. Ohio logs 168,038 awards on $8.1B. Ohio’s file is busier, but not by the 3-to-1 population ratio (11,883,304 versus 3,675,069). Connecticut’s smaller file on a near-$8 billion stock implies a heavier typical booking than a raw population comparison would suggest.
Connecticut’s 3,675,069 residents versus Ohio’s 11,883,304 residents is the Census engine of $266.81 versus $61.66. The aviation-family labels—other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing versus aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing—do not cancel that intensity gap. FY2026 of $980,534,818 versus $732,683,316 already favors Connecticut. Stacked dollars of $7,483,687,896 versus $8,141,450,027 still favor Ohio. Award rows are 94,990 versus 168,038.
Four times the per-capita intensity
Connecticut’s $7,483,687,896 on 3,675,069 residents produces $266.81 per capita. Ohio’s $8,141,450,027 on 11,883,304 residents produces $61.66. Intensity in Connecticut is more than four times Ohio’s. That is the headline split, not the $658 million stacked gap.
A $266.81 per-person reading is an intensity fact attached to $7.5B, not a transfer to each resident. Ohio’s $61.66 is attached to $8.1B. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not GDP. Ohio can lead stacked dollars while trailing badly on a per-resident basis because 11,883,304 people spread a similar stock more thinly.
Full analysis: Connecticut vs Ohio on USAspending: $7.5B vs $8.1B →
Questions
- Which state has more federal spending, Connecticut or Ohio?
- Ohio leads in stacked USAspending.gov obligations: $8,141,450,027 versus Connecticut’s $7,483,687,896. Ohio has more awards (168,038 vs 94,990) and more people (11,883,304 vs 3,675,069). Spending per capita is $266.81 in Connecticut and $61.66 in Ohio. FY2026 obligations are $980.5M and $732.7M. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.
- Why is Connecticut’s per-capita federal spending so much higher than Ohio’s?
- Connecticut’s $7.5B stock sits on 3,675,069 residents, which produces $266.81 per capita. Ohio’s $8.1B stock sits on 11,883,304 residents, which produces $61.66. Intensity favors Connecticut by more than four times. Award rows are 94,990 versus 168,038. FY2026 also favors Connecticut ($980.5M vs $732.7M).
- Do Connecticut and Ohio share the same top industry?
- They share an aircraft-manufacturing family, not the same NAICS label. Connecticut’s top industry is other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing. Ohio’s is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Those slices sit on $7.5B and $8.1B stocks. Award counts are 94,990 in Connecticut and 168,038 in Ohio.
- Are Connecticut vs Ohio figures Treasury outlays?
- No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $7.5B and $8.1B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $980.5M and $732.7M measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
| Connecticut | Metric | Ohio |
|---|---|---|
| $59.58B | Total Spending | $62.69B |
| $16K | Per Capita | $5K |
| N/A | % of GDP | N/A |
| 3.7M | Population | 11.9M |
| N/A | Median Income | N/A |
| N/A | Poverty Rate | N/A |
| N/A | Bachelor Degree % | N/A |
| N/A | Median Age | N/A |
| N/A | Unemployment | N/A |
| N/A | GDP (Millions) | N/A |
Top Agencies — Connecticut
- Department of Health and Human Services$240.36B
- Department of Defense$228.43B
- Social Security Administration$49.49B
- Department of Transportation$6.66B
- Department of Education$4.52B
Top Agencies — Ohio
- Social Security Administration$149.68B
- Department of Health and Human Services$145.80B
- Department of Defense$29.78B
- Department of Agriculture$17.08B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$16.27B
Top Industries — Connecticut
- SHIP BUILDING AND REPAIRING$93.65B
- AIRCRAFT ENGINE AND ENGINE PARTS MANUFACTURING$40.66B
- ENGINEERING SERVICES$34.53B
- AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$32.55B
- OTHER AIRCRAFT PARTS AND AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING$6.67B
Top Industries — Ohio
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$6.27B
- REMEDIATION SERVICES$5.11B
- AIRCRAFT ENGINE AND ENGINE PARTS MANUFACTURING$4.51B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)$3.04B
- ENGINEERING SERVICES$2.21B
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · Connecticut · Ohio