Georgia vs Oklahoma

Same aircraft family, different dollar stocks

These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Georgia’s $9.7B stock sits about $4.2 billion above Oklahoma’s $5.5B. Place of performance in the award file is the scoring rule. The pair is useful because the top NAICS labels sit in the same aircraft-manufacturing family even while scale, people, and rows diverge.

Georgia logs 278,028 awards on $9.7B. Oklahoma logs 50,460 awards on $5.5B. Oklahoma’s thinner file on a still-large stock implies a heavier typical booking. Georgia’s busier file on a larger stock is consistent with more actions, not necessarily smaller ones. The $9.7B versus $5.5B ranking is a dollar ranking, not a row ranking.

Georgia’s 278,028 awards on $9,693,034,475 versus Oklahoma’s 50,460 awards on $5,456,947,205 is a scale gap inside one aircraft-manufacturing family. People of 11,180,878 versus 4,095,393 produce $95.66 versus $205.98. FY2026 of $1,069,558,753 versus $843,573,742 stays with Georgia by a smaller ratio than the stacked ranking. Finished aircraft versus parts is mix. Related NAICS labels are not interchangeable files.

Oklahoma’s $205.98 versus Georgia’s $95.66

Georgia’s 11,180,878 residents against $9.7B produce $95.66 per capita. Oklahoma’s 4,095,393 residents against $5.5B produce $205.98. Intensity in Oklahoma is more than double Georgia’s even though Georgia holds the much larger stacked total.

A $205.98 per-person reading is an intensity fact attached to $5.5B, not a household payment. Georgia’s $95.66 is attached to $9.7B. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not GDP. Georgia can lead stacked dollars while trailing on a per-resident basis because 11,180,878 people spread $9.7B more thinly than 4,095,393 people spread $5.5B.

Questions

Which state has more federal spending, Georgia or Oklahoma?

Georgia leads in stacked USAspending.gov obligations: $9,693,034,475 versus Oklahoma’s $5,456,947,205. Georgia has more awards (278,028 vs 50,460) and more people (11,180,878 vs 4,095,393). Spending per capita is $95.66 in Georgia and $205.98 in Oklahoma. FY2026 obligations are $1.07B and $843.6M. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Do Georgia and Oklahoma share the same top federal industry?

They share an aircraft-manufacturing family, not the same NAICS label. Georgia’s top industry is aircraft manufacturing. Oklahoma’s is other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing. Those slices sit on $9.7B and $5.5B stocks. Award counts are 278,028 in Georgia and 50,460 in Oklahoma.

Why is Oklahoma’s per-capita spending higher than Georgia’s?

Oklahoma’s $5.5B stock sits on 4,095,393 residents, which produces $205.98 per capita. Georgia’s $9.7B stock sits on 11,180,878 residents, which produces $95.66. Intensity more than doubles in Oklahoma. The stacked ranking still favors Georgia. FY2026 is $843.6M versus $1.07B.

Are Georgia vs Oklahoma figures Treasury outlays?

No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $9.7B and $5.5B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $1.07B and $843.6M measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments.