Idaho vs New Hampshire

Idaho’s extra people, New Hampshire’s extra dollars

Idaho’s 2,001,619 residents exceed New Hampshire’s 1,409,032. New Hampshire still holds the larger obligation stock: $2.48B versus $1.20B. Intensity follows: $284.15 per capita versus $80.33. The Mountain Census count does not produce the larger USAspending.gov file.

Award volume favors Idaho, 29,667 versus 9,224. Idaho’s file is denser in rows on a smaller stock. New Hampshire’s 9,224 actions sit on $2.48B beside the $284.15 reading.

FY2026 widens New Hampshire’s dollar lead on recency: $400.4M versus $160.8M. Cite USAspending.gov for the stacked stocks and the latest-year amounts.

Idaho’s $1.20B on 2,001,619 residents trails New Hampshire’s $2.48B on 1,409,032. Spending per capita of $80.33 versus $284.15 is the wide gap. Idaho’s 29,667 awards exceed 9,224. FY2026 of $160.8M versus $400.4M widens New Hampshire’s recency lead. All dollar cuts are USAspending.gov obligations.

Commercial and institutional building construction versus small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing is mix. Outlays are not listed. Cite USAspending.gov. The comparison hub holds the tables.

Construction in Idaho, ordnance in New Hampshire

Idaho’s lead NAICS is commercial and institutional building construction. New Hampshire’s lead NAICS is small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing. Those peaks sit on $1.20B and $2.48B. Construction is a first read on Idaho’s mix; ordnance is a first read on New Hampshire’s mix.

The 29,667 Idaho awards and 9,224 New Hampshire awards include many actions outside those labels. Use the Idaho and New Hampshire state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes.

Questions

Does Idaho or New Hampshire have more federal spending?

New Hampshire leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $2.48B to Idaho’s $1.20B. New Hampshire also leads spending per capita, $284.15 versus $80.33, on 1,409,032 residents against Idaho’s 2,001,619. Idaho has more awards (29,667 vs 9,224). FY2026 obligations are $160.8M in Idaho and $400.4M in New Hampshire.

Why is New Hampshire’s per-capita figure so much higher than Idaho’s?

The packet reports $284.15 per capita in New Hampshire on 1,409,032 residents and $80.33 in Idaho on 2,001,619. Stacked stocks are $2.48B versus $1.20B. Award counts are 9,224 versus 29,667. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

What industries lead in Idaho and New Hampshire?

Idaho’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. New Hampshire’s is small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $1.20B and $2.48B. Award counts are 29,667 in Idaho and 9,224 in New Hampshire.

Are Idaho vs New Hampshire figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $1.20B and $2.48B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $160.8M and $400.4M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($80.33 vs $284.15) uses Census population where present.