Skip to main content

Kansas vs Minnesota

Federal spending comparison

Kansas holds $2.91B in USAspending.gov obligations against Minnesota’s $2.74B. Minnesota has nearly twice the people—5,793,151 versus 2,970,606—yet spending per capita is almost even: $67.40 in Kansas and $66.07 in Minnesota. Minnesota files more awards (98,897 versus 71,423). FY2026 obligations are $200.2M in Kansas and $382.8M in Minnesota. Computer systems design services lead Kansas; pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds lead Minnesota. The figures are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

  • Kansas $2.91B vs Minnesota $2.74B in stacked USAspending obligations.
  • Per capita nearly even: $67.40 vs $66.07 on 2,970,606 vs 5,793,151 residents.
  • Awards: 71,423 vs 98,897; FY2026 $200.2M vs $382.8M.
  • Top industries: computer systems design in Kansas; pharmacy benefit management in Minnesota.
  • Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Nearly identical per-capita readings on different Census counts

Kansas’s $67.40 per capita and Minnesota’s $66.07 sit on $2.91B versus $2.74B and on 2,970,606 versus 5,793,151 residents. The ratios match; the headcounts do not. Kansas’s smaller Census count still produces the larger stacked stock.

Award volume favors Minnesota, 98,897 versus 71,423. Minnesota’s file is denser in rows on a smaller stock. Kansas’s 71,423 actions sit on $2.91B.

FY2026 favors Minnesota on recency: $382.8M versus $200.2M. Cite USAspending.gov for the stacked stocks and the latest-year amounts. Outlays are not in the packet.

Kansas’s $2.91B on 2,970,606 residents and Minnesota’s $2.74B on 5,793,151 residents produce nearly even per-capita readings of $67.40 and $66.07. That match is an obligation-ratio result, not an outlay result. FY2026 of $200.2M versus $382.8M still favors Minnesota on recency.

Award counts of 71,423 and 98,897 stay row totals. Computer systems design services versus pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds is mix. Cite USAspending.gov. Do not convert the stocks into cash.

Systems design versus pharmacy administration

Kansas’s lead NAICS is computer systems design services. Minnesota’s lead NAICS is pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds. Those peaks sit on $2.91B and $2.74B.

The 71,423 Kansas awards and 98,897 Minnesota awards include many actions outside those labels. Use the Kansas and Minnesota state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes.

Full analysis: Kansas vs Minnesota on USAspending: $2.91B vs $2.74B

Questions

Does Kansas or Minnesota have more federal spending?
Kansas leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $2.91B to Minnesota’s $2.74B. Spending per capita is close: $67.40 versus $66.07 on 2,970,606 versus 5,793,151 residents. Minnesota has more awards (98,897 vs 71,423) and more FY2026 obligations ($382.8M vs $200.2M).
Why are the per-capita figures so close?
The packet reports $67.40 per capita in Kansas on 2,970,606 residents and $66.07 in Minnesota on 5,793,151. Stacked stocks are $2.91B versus $2.74B. The smaller Kansas Census count sits on a slightly larger stock. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
What industries lead in Kansas and Minnesota?
Kansas’s top industry is computer systems design services. Minnesota’s is pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $2.91B and $2.74B. Award counts are 71,423 in Kansas and 98,897 in Minnesota.
Are Kansas vs Minnesota figures Treasury outlays?
No. The $2.91B and $2.74B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $200.2M and $382.8M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($67.40 vs $66.07) uses Census population where present.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.

Side-by-side federal spending and demographic comparison between Kansas and Minnesota.
KansasMetricMinnesota
$14.04BTotal Spending$116.24B
$5KPer Capita$20K
N/A% of GDPN/A
3.0MPopulation5.8M
N/AMedian IncomeN/A
N/APoverty RateN/A
N/ABachelor Degree %N/A
N/AMedian AgeN/A
N/AUnemploymentN/A
N/AGDP (Millions)N/A

Top Agencies — Kansas

  • Social Security Administration$36.98B
  • Department of Health and Human Services$22.23B
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$12.58B
  • Department of Defense$8.60B
  • Department of Agriculture$6.22B

Top Agencies — Minnesota

  • Department of Health and Human Services$505.87B
  • Social Security Administration$72.83B
  • Department of Defense$22.63B
  • Department of Agriculture$16.40B
  • Department of Veterans Affairs$7.88B

Top Industries — Kansas

  • COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES$6.97B
  • AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$1.96B
  • OTHER COMPUTER RELATED SERVICES$1.06B
  • COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$934.4M
  • AIRCRAFT ENGINE AND ENGINE PARTS MANUFACTURING$849.5M

Top Industries — Minnesota

  • DIRECT HEALTH AND MEDICAL INSURANCE CARRIERS$13.15B
  • AMMUNITION (EXCEPT SMALL ARMS) MANUFACTURING$3.41B
  • ENGINEERING SERVICES$782.1M
  • SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION MANUFACTURING$669.0M
  • COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$644.5M