Skip to main content

Massachusetts vs District of Columbia

Federal spending comparison

The District of Columbia accounts for $19.9B in federal obligations on USAspending.gov. Massachusetts accounts for $13.5B. Massachusetts has 7,136,171 residents; the District has 702,250. Spending per capita is $364.70 in Massachusetts and $3,166.95 in the District. Massachusetts logs 294,824 awards against the District’s 95,844. FY2026 flips the dollar lead: Massachusetts books $2.6B while the District books $2.2B.

Key figures

  • District of Columbia $19.9B vs Massachusetts $13.5B in USAspending obligations — D.C. leads the stacked file.
  • Populations: Massachusetts 7,136,171 vs D.C. 702,250; per capita $364.70 vs $3,166.95.
  • Massachusetts has more awards (294,824 vs 95,844); FY2026 $2.6B vs $2.2B favors Massachusetts.
  • Top industries: aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing (MA) vs administrative management and general management consulting services (DC).
  • Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

The District’s $19.9B versus Massachusetts’s $13.5B

These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. The District’s $19.9B is about 1.5 times Massachusetts’s $13.5B. Place of performance in the award file is not a population contest. A 702,250-person capital can outrun a 7,136,171-person New England state in this aggregate because headquarters contracting stacks dollars in the District.

Award counts favor Massachusetts. Massachusetts has 294,824 awards; the District has 95,844. Massachusetts’s file is busier in rows and lighter in dollars. The District’s file is heavier in dollars on fewer actions — a higher typical booking. The $19.9B versus $13.5B ranking is a dollar ranking, not a row ranking.

Capital intensity versus a $364.70 New England reading

Massachusetts’s 7,136,171 residents dwarf the District’s 702,250. After dividing the obligation stocks by those Census counts, the District shows $3,166.95 per capita and Massachusetts shows $364.70. Massachusetts is already intensive relative to many large states; the District is in another band because 702,250 residents sit under $19.9B.

A $364.70 per-person reading in Massachusetts on 7,136,171 residents is an intensity fact attached to a $13.5B stock. The District’s $3,166.95 is not a claim that every resident received that amount. This table scores USAspending awards, not GDP and not a household transfer.

Full analysis: Massachusetts vs District of Columbia on USAspending: $13.5B vs $19.9B

Questions

Which has more federal spending, Massachusetts or the District of Columbia?
The District of Columbia leads in stacked USAspending.gov obligations: $19.9B versus Massachusetts’s $13.5B. Massachusetts has more awards (294,824 vs 95,844) and more people (7,136,171 vs 702,250). Spending per capita is $364.70 in Massachusetts and $3,166.95 in the District. FY2026 obligations are $2.6B in Massachusetts and $2.2B in the District. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Does Massachusetts have a larger FY2026 total than D.C.?
Yes. FY2026 obligations are $2.6B in Massachusetts and $2.2B in the District, reversing the stacked $13.5B versus $19.9B ranking. Massachusetts also logs more awards (294,824 vs 95,844). The District still leads per capita ($3,166.95 vs $364.70) on 702,250 residents versus 7,136,171. Recency and stock are different cuts.
What industries lead Massachusetts and D.C. federal awards?
Massachusetts’s top industry is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. The District’s is administrative management and general management consulting services. Those slices sit on $13.5B and $19.9B in obligations. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award. Award counts are 294,824 in Massachusetts and 95,844 in the District.
Are Massachusetts vs D.C. figures Treasury outlays?
No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $13.5B and $19.9B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $2.6B and $2.2B measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments. Place of performance can differ from where the paying agency sits.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.

Side-by-side federal spending and demographic comparison between Massachusetts and District of Columbia.
MassachusettsMetricDistrict of Columbia
$43.05BTotal Spending$18.02B
$6KPer Capita$26K
N/A% of GDPN/A
7.1MPopulation702K
N/AMedian IncomeN/A
N/APoverty RateN/A
N/ABachelor Degree %N/A
N/AMedian AgeN/A
N/AUnemploymentN/A
N/AGDP (Millions)N/A

Top Agencies — Massachusetts

  • Department of Health and Human Services$138.54B
  • Department of Defense$112.05B
  • Social Security Administration$86.41B
  • General Services Administration$13.54B
  • Department of Agriculture$11.34B

Top Agencies — District of Columbia

  • Department of Transportation$56.43B
  • Department of Defense$35.97B
  • Department of Health and Human Services$30.00B
  • Department of State$21.68B
  • Department of Homeland Security$18.82B

Top Industries — Massachusetts

  • SEARCH, DETECTION, NAVIGATION, GUIDANCE, AERONAUTICAL, AND NAUTICAL SYSTEM AND INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURING$30.64B
  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)$17.15B
  • ENGINEERING SERVICES$16.64B
  • AIRCRAFT ENGINE AND ENGINE PARTS MANUFACTURING$7.61B
  • RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$4.93B

Top Industries — District of Columbia

  • COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES$29.48B
  • ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES$26.89B
  • ENGINEERING SERVICES$21.45B
  • OTHER COMPUTER RELATED SERVICES$16.10B
  • CUSTOM COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES$6.61B