Nevada vs South Carolina
Federal spending comparison
South Carolina accounts for $3.85B in USAspending.gov obligations; Nevada accounts for $2.86B. Spending per capita flips the ranking: $171.84 in Nevada on 3,267,467 residents and $83.98 in South Carolina on 5,478,831. Award counts favor South Carolina, 129,440 to 45,442. Fiscal year 2026 dollars flip again, $561.5M in Nevada versus $460.1M in South Carolina. Nevada’s top industry is automobile manufacturing; South Carolina’s is biological product manufacturing. These figures are obligations, not outlays.
Key figures
- South Carolina $3.85B vs Nevada $2.86B in stacked USAspending obligations.
- Nevada per capita $171.84 vs South Carolina $83.98 on 3,267,467 vs 5,478,831 residents.
- Awards: 45,442 vs 129,440; FY2026 $561.5M vs $460.1M.
- Top industries: automobile manufacturing in Nevada; biologics manufacturing in South Carolina.
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
South Carolina wins the stock; Nevada wins intensity and FY2026
South Carolina’s $3.85B stacked total is about 1.35 times Nevada’s $2.86B. South Carolina’s Census count of 5,478,831 is about 1.68 times Nevada’s 3,267,467. Intensity therefore runs against the stock: $171.84 per capita in Nevada and $83.98 in South Carolina. Nevada concentrates $2.86B on fewer people. South Carolina spreads $3.85B on more people. Those ratios are packet figures of USAspending.gov obligations beside Census population, not outlays per resident.
Award counts follow the dollar ranking. South Carolina files 129,440 actions; Nevada files 45,442. About 2.85 times as many rows sit on about 1.35 times the dollars. South Carolina’s file is busier. Nevada’s file is hotter per resident.
FY2026 then hands Nevada a recency lead the stacked ranking conceals. That three-way split — stock one way, intensity the other, recency the other — is this pair’s structure.
Automobile manufacturing versus biologics manufacturing
Nevada’s lead NAICS is automobile manufacturing. South Carolina’s lead NAICS is biological product (except diagnostic) manufacturing. Auto manufacturing is Nevada’s peak on $2.86B and 45,442 awards. Biologics manufacturing is South Carolina’s peak on $3.85B and 129,440 awards. Two manufacturing peaks, two different products, two different file shapes.
Those labels are the largest NAICS slices, not complete profiles. The Nevada and South Carolina state hubs list agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes.
Full analysis: Nevada vs South Carolina on USAspending: $2.86B vs $3.85B →
Questions
- Does Nevada or South Carolina have more federal spending?
- South Carolina leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $3.85B to Nevada’s $2.86B. Nevada leads spending per capita, $171.84 versus $83.98, on 3,267,467 residents against South Carolina’s 5,478,831. South Carolina has more awards (129,440 vs 45,442). FY2026 obligations are $561.5M in Nevada and $460.1M in South Carolina.
- Which state leads in the latest fiscal year?
- Fiscal year 2026 obligations are $561.5M in Nevada and $460.1M in South Carolina. Nevada leads the recency slice even though South Carolina leads the stacked $3.85B versus $2.86B stock. Both amounts are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays. Cite only the packet ratios; do not treat them as cash per resident or as a forecast.
- What industries lead in Nevada and South Carolina?
- Nevada’s top industry is automobile manufacturing. South Carolina’s is biological product (except diagnostic) manufacturing. Those labels sit on $2.86B and $3.85B. Award counts are 45,442 in Nevada and 129,440 in South Carolina. Those NAICS labels are the largest slices on the stacked stocks, not complete industrial profiles.
- Are Nevada vs South Carolina figures Treasury outlays?
- No. The $2.86B and $3.85B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $561.5M and $460.1M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($171.84 vs $83.98) uses Census population where present. Spending per capita uses Census population where present and should not be read as cash per resident.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
| Nevada | Metric | South Carolina |
|---|---|---|
| $16.56B | Total Spending | $61.05B |
| $5K | Per Capita | $11K |
| N/A | % of GDP | N/A |
| 3.3M | Population | 5.5M |
| N/A | Median Income | N/A |
| N/A | Poverty Rate | N/A |
| N/A | Bachelor Degree % | N/A |
| N/A | Median Age | N/A |
| N/A | Unemployment | N/A |
| N/A | GDP (Millions) | N/A |
Top Agencies — Nevada
- Social Security Administration$36.22B
- Department of Health and Human Services$28.44B
- Department of Energy$13.81B
- Department of Defense$9.27B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$7.58B
Top Agencies — South Carolina
- Department of Health and Human Services$236.02B
- Social Security Administration$78.83B
- Department of Energy$40.24B
- Department of Defense$16.77B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$15.08B
Top Industries — Nevada
- FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES$12.91B
- ENGINEERING SERVICES$2.22B
- OTHER SUPPORT ACTIVITIES FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION$1.57B
- COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$1.12B
- AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURING$1.06B
Top Industries — South Carolina
- FACILITIES SUPPORT SERVICES$25.97B
- HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL$6.63B
- ENGINEERING SERVICES$6.47B
- REMEDIATION SERVICES$3.68B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN BIOTECHNOLOGY (EXCEPT NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY)$3.59B
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · Nevada · South Carolina