Ohio vs Washington
Federal spending comparison
Ohio accounts for $8,141,450,027 in federal obligations on USAspending.gov. Washington accounts for $7,337,035,583. Ohio leads stacked dollars by about $804 million. Washington leads on two quieter cuts: award count (236,821 versus 168,038) and spending per capita ($73.46 versus $61.66). Populations are 11,883,304 in Ohio and 7,958,180 in Washington. FY2026 obligations are $732.7M in Ohio and $584.6M in Washington.
Key figures
- Ohio $8.1B vs Washington $7.3B in USAspending obligations.
- Populations: Ohio 11,883,304 vs Washington 7,958,180; per capita $61.66 vs $73.46.
- Washington has more awards (236,821 vs 168,038); FY2026 $732.7M vs $584.6M.
- Top industries: aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing (OH) vs commercial and institutional building construction (WA).
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Ohio’s larger stock, Washington’s busier file
These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Ohio’s $8.1B stock sits $804 million above Washington’s $7.3B. Place of performance in the award file is the scoring rule. Ohio has more people (11,883,304 versus 7,958,180) and more stacked dollars. Washington still logs more awards: 236,821 against Ohio’s 168,038.
That row inversion on a smaller stock implies a lighter typical booking in Washington. Ohio’s $8,141,450,027 sits on 168,038 records. Washington’s $7,337,035,583 is spread across 236,821 actions. Dollars favor Ohio; paperwork volume favors Washington. The $8.1B versus $7.3B ranking is a dollar ranking, not a row ranking.
Ohio’s $8,141,450,027 versus Washington’s $7,337,035,583 is a modest stacked gap. Washington’s 236,821 awards versus Ohio’s 168,038 is the paperwork counter. $73.46 on 7,958,180 residents versus $61.66 on 11,883,304 residents is a modest intensity counter. FY2026 of $732,683,316 versus $584,612,717 stays with Ohio. Aircraft engines versus building construction is mix. None of those cuts is an outlay.
A modest intensity edge for Washington
Ohio’s 11,883,304 residents against $8.1B produce $61.66 per capita. Washington’s 7,958,180 residents against $7.3B produce $73.46. Intensity favors Washington by about $12 per person even though Ohio holds the larger stacked total and the larger Census count.
A $73.46 per-person reading is an intensity fact attached to $7.3B, not a household payment. Ohio’s $61.66 is attached to $8.1B. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not GDP. The intensity gap is real and modest. It does not erase Ohio’s $804 million stacked lead or Ohio’s FY2026 lead.
Full analysis: Ohio vs Washington on USAspending: $8.1B vs $7.3B →
Questions
- Which state has more federal spending, Ohio or Washington?
- Ohio leads in stacked USAspending.gov obligations: $8,141,450,027 versus Washington’s $7,337,035,583. Washington has more awards (236,821 vs 168,038). Ohio has more people (11,883,304 vs 7,958,180). Spending per capita is $61.66 in Ohio and $73.46 in Washington. FY2026 obligations are $732.7M and $584.6M. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.
- Does Washington have more federal awards than Ohio?
- Yes. Washington logs 236,821 awards on $7.3B. Ohio logs 168,038 awards on $8.1B. Washington’s busier file on a smaller stock implies a lighter typical booking. Per capita is $73.46 versus $61.66. Populations are 7,958,180 and 11,883,304. FY2026 still favors Ohio ($732.7M vs $584.6M).
- What industries lead Ohio and Washington federal awards?
- Ohio’s top industry is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Washington’s is commercial and institutional building construction. Those slices sit on $8.1B and $7.3B obligation stocks. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award in either state. Award counts are 168,038 in Ohio and 236,821 in Washington.
- Are Ohio vs Washington figures Treasury outlays?
- No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $8.1B and $7.3B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $732.7M and $584.6M measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
| Ohio | Metric | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| $62.69B | Total Spending | $51.61B |
| $5K | Per Capita | $6K |
| N/A | % of GDP | N/A |
| 11.9M | Population | 8.0M |
| N/A | Median Income | N/A |
| N/A | Poverty Rate | N/A |
| N/A | Bachelor Degree % | N/A |
| N/A | Median Age | N/A |
| N/A | Unemployment | N/A |
| N/A | GDP (Millions) | N/A |
Top Agencies — Ohio
- Social Security Administration$149.68B
- Department of Health and Human Services$145.80B
- Department of Defense$29.78B
- Department of Agriculture$17.08B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$16.27B
Top Agencies — Washington
- Department of Health and Human Services$95.41B
- Social Security Administration$94.70B
- Department of Defense$77.37B
- Department of Energy$74.17B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$15.02B
Top Industries — Ohio
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT NANOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY)$6.27B
- REMEDIATION SERVICES$5.11B
- AIRCRAFT ENGINE AND ENGINE PARTS MANUFACTURING$4.51B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY)$3.04B
- ENGINEERING SERVICES$2.21B
Top Industries — Washington
- AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$57.18B
- RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES$29.45B
- INDUSTRIAL NONBUILDING STRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION$16.69B
- HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL$11.38B
- REMEDIATION SERVICES$10.65B
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · Ohio · Washington