South Dakota vs Texas
Federal spending comparison
Texas’s USAspending.gov obligation stock is $72.7B; South Dakota’s is $1.0B. South Dakota files only 8,274 awards against Texas’s 530,634 — one of the thinnest tapes in this slice on a $1.0B stock. Census counts are 924,669 in South Dakota and 31,290,831 in Texas. Spending per capita is $79.92 versus $686.1. FY2026 obligations are $73.9M in South Dakota and $21.5B in Texas. Electronic computer manufacturing leads South Dakota; pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing leads Texas. The series is obligations, not outlays.
Key figures
- Texas $72.7B vs South Dakota $1.0B in stacked USAspending obligations.
- South Dakota files only 8,274 awards vs Texas’s 530,634.
- Per capita: Texas $686.1 vs South Dakota $79.92 on 31,290,831 vs 924,669 residents.
- FY2026 $21.5B vs $73.9M; electronic computer manufacturing leads South Dakota.
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
8,274 awards on a $1.0B stock
South Dakota’s award count is the distinctive fact. 8,274 actions on $1.0B is a concentrated file, consistent with an electronic-computer-manufacturing peak rather than a high-frequency logistics tape. Texas’s 530,634 actions on $72.7B is a broad file with a pharmaceutical-preparation peak. The packet does not publish average award size. The contrast in counts is enough to flag concentration on the South Dakota side.
Population is 924,669 versus 31,290,831. South Dakota is small on people, small on dollars, and cool on intensity at $79.92 versus $686.1. The thin award tape does not reverse any of those rankings. It describes how the $1.0B is booked.
South Dakota’s $1.0B computer-manufacturing stock on 924,669 residents is a concentrated 8,274-row file; Texas’s $72.7B pharmaceutical-preparation stock on 31,290,831 residents is a 530,634-row file. FY2026 of $73.9M versus $21.5B does not reorder that ranking.
Computer manufacturing versus pharmaceutical preparations
South Dakota’s lead NAICS is electronic computer manufacturing. Texas’s lead NAICS is pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Two manufacturing peaks, two products, two scales: $1.0B versus $72.7B. The computer-manufacturing label is a first read of South Dakota’s mix. It is not a census of every one of the 8,274 awards.
Use the South Dakota and Texas state hubs for agencies and recipients. Cite USAspending.gov. Do not convert either peak into an outlay category.
Full analysis: South Dakota vs Texas on USAspending: $1.0B against $72.7B →
Questions
- Does South Dakota or Texas have more federal spending?
- Texas leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $72.7B to South Dakota’s $1.0B. Texas also leads spending per capita, $686.1 versus $79.92, on 31,290,831 residents against South Dakota’s 924,669. Award counts are 530,634 in Texas and 8,274 in South Dakota. FY2026 obligations are $21.5B in Texas and $73.9M in South Dakota.
- Why does South Dakota have so few awards?
- The packet reports 8,274 awards in South Dakota on $1.0B versus 530,634 in Texas on $72.7B. South Dakota’s lead industry is electronic computer manufacturing, a mix that can concentrate dollars in fewer actions. Spending per capita is $79.92 versus $686.1. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
- What industries lead in South Dakota and Texas?
- South Dakota’s top industry is electronic computer manufacturing. Texas’s is pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $1.0B and $72.7B. Award counts are 8,274 in South Dakota and 530,634 in Texas. Those peaks are mix labels on the stacked stocks, not inventories of every award.
- Are South Dakota vs Texas figures Treasury outlays?
- No. The $1.0B and $72.7B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $73.9M and $21.5B, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($79.92 vs $686.1) uses Census population where present. Award counts in the packet are all-years totals, not a single fiscal year’s actions.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
| South Dakota | Metric | Texas |
|---|---|---|
| $5.43B | Total Spending | $147.74B |
| $6K | Per Capita | $5K |
| N/A | % of GDP | N/A |
| 925K | Population | 31.3M |
| N/A | Median Income | N/A |
| N/A | Poverty Rate | N/A |
| N/A | Bachelor Degree % | N/A |
| N/A | Median Age | N/A |
| N/A | Unemployment | N/A |
| N/A | GDP (Millions) | N/A |
Top Agencies — South Dakota
- Social Security Administration$11.65B
- Department of Health and Human Services$9.00B
- Department of Agriculture$3.30B
- Department of the Treasury$2.72B
- Department of Defense$2.57B
Top Agencies — Texas
- Department of Defense$483.10B
- Social Security Administration$284.97B
- Department of Health and Human Services$218.33B
- Department of Veterans Affairs$107.92B
- Department of Homeland Security$55.28B
Top Industries — South Dakota
- COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$1.76B
- OTHER HEAVY AND CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION$334.5M
- COMPUTER FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES$219.2M
- HIGHWAY, STREET, AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION$170.1M
- ELECTRONIC COMPUTER MANUFACTURING$166.5M
Top Industries — Texas
- AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURING$299.18B
- GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE MANUFACTURING$62.54B
- OTHER AIRCRAFT PARTS AND AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING$29.46B
- PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATION MANUFACTURING$29.13B
- COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$26.71B
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · South Dakota · Texas