South Dakota vs Vermont
Federal spending comparison
South Dakota’s stacked USAspending.gov obligation stock is $1.0B; Vermont’s is $1.0B. The all-years totals are a near-tie. Spending per capita is $79.92 versus $72.92 on 924,669 residents against 648,493. Award counts are 8,274 versus 12,020. FY2026 obligations are $73.9M versus $47.3M. Electronic computer manufacturing leads South Dakota; other guided missile and space vehicle parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing leads Vermont. The figures are obligations, not outlays.
Key figures
- South Dakota $1.0B vs Vermont $1.0B in stacked USAspending obligations.
- Per capita $79.92 vs $72.92 on 924,669 vs 648,493 residents.
- Awards 8,274 vs 12,020; FY2026 $73.9M vs $47.3M.
- Top industries: electronic computer manufacturing in South Dakota; other guided missile and space vehicle parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing in Vermont.
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
A $1.0B near-tie that mix and recency still split
Stacked dollars of $1.0B versus $1.0B look like a duplicate file. They are not. South Dakota’s lead NAICS is electronic computer manufacturing on 8,274 awards. Vermont’s is other guided missile and space vehicle parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing on 12,020 awards. Mix differs. Cite USAspending.gov.
FY2026 of $73.9M versus $47.3M is the recency split on a matched stacked ranking. South Dakota leads the latest year. Vermont files more awards, 12,020 versus 8,274, on the same $1.0B stock. More rows do not produce the larger latest-year slice.
Population of 924,669 versus 648,493 favors South Dakota on headcount. Intensity of $79.92 versus $72.92 stays in a moderate band. Neither state posts a small-state spike here. Treat FY2026 as an obligation slice. Outlays are omitted. Census counts belong with those ratios on USAspending.gov obligations.
Electronic computer manufacturing versus missile and space vehicle parts
Those NAICS peaks sit on matched $1.0B stocks. They are first reads, not interchangeable manufacturing rankings. Use the South Dakota and Vermont state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes. Outlays are not listed.
Vermont’s extra awards (12,020 vs 8,274) sit beside the thinner $47.3M FY2026 slice. South Dakota’s thinner log sits beside $73.9M recency. Row count is not average award size.
Full analysis: South Dakota vs Vermont on USAspending: $1.0B vs $1.0B →
Questions
- Does South Dakota or Vermont have more federal spending?
- Stacked USAspending.gov obligations are $1.0B in South Dakota and $1.0B in Vermont. Spending per capita is $79.92 versus $72.92 on 924,669 and 648,493 residents. Award counts are 8,274 versus 12,020. FY2026 obligations are $73.9M in South Dakota and $47.3M in Vermont. Both dollar series are obligations, not outlays.
- What industries lead in South Dakota and Vermont?
- South Dakota's top industry is electronic computer manufacturing. Vermont's is other guided missile and space vehicle parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $1.0B and $1.0B. Award counts are 8,274 in South Dakota and 12,020 in Vermont. The rest of each mix sits outside those peaks on USAspending.gov obligation files.
- How do South Dakota and Vermont compare on a per-capita basis?
- The packet reports $79.92 per capita in South Dakota on 924,669 residents and $72.92 in Vermont on 648,493 residents. Stacked stocks are $1.0B versus $1.0B. Award counts are 8,274 versus 12,020. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays. FY2026 amounts are $73.9M versus $47.3M.
- Are South Dakota vs Vermont figures Treasury outlays?
- No. The $1.0B and $1.0B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $73.9M and $47.3M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag behind commitments. Spending per capita ($79.92 vs $72.92) uses Census population where present. This packet does not publish outlays.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.
| South Dakota | Metric | Vermont |
|---|---|---|
| $5.43B | Total Spending | $4.36B |
| $6K | Per Capita | $7K |
| N/A | % of GDP | N/A |
| 925K | Population | 648K |
| N/A | Median Income | N/A |
| N/A | Poverty Rate | N/A |
| N/A | Bachelor Degree % | N/A |
| N/A | Median Age | N/A |
| N/A | Unemployment | N/A |
| N/A | GDP (Millions) | N/A |
Top Agencies — South Dakota
- Social Security Administration$11.65B
- Department of Health and Human Services$9.00B
- Department of Agriculture$3.30B
- Department of the Treasury$2.72B
- Department of Defense$2.57B
Top Agencies — Vermont
- Social Security Administration$10.01B
- Department of Health and Human Services$8.85B
- Department of Defense$4.61B
- Department of Transportation$1.66B
- Department of Agriculture$1.40B
Top Industries — South Dakota
- COMMERCIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION$1.76B
- OTHER HEAVY AND CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION$334.5M
- COMPUTER FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES$219.2M
- HIGHWAY, STREET, AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION$170.1M
- ELECTRONIC COMPUTER MANUFACTURING$166.5M
Top Industries — Vermont
- AMMUNITION (EXCEPT SMALL ARMS) MANUFACTURING$1.18B
- ENGINEERING SERVICES$918.5M
- OTHER GUIDED MISSILE AND SPACE VEHICLE PARTS AND AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING$613.2M
- COMPUTER SYSTEMS DESIGN SERVICES$277.9M
- OTHER COMPUTER RELATED SERVICES$277.3M
Source: USAspending.gov · More Comparisons · South Dakota · Vermont