Colorado 5th District

What the VA disability–CO-05 join is

CFDA 64.109 and congressional district CO-05 meet here. $1,201,205,574 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Veterans Compensation For Service-Connected Disability’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to Colorado 5th District (CO-05), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split rating percentages and does not publish a veteran denominator. 12 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a veteran headcount, a rating census, or a named-beneficiary file.

Dividing $1,201,205,574 by 12 yields about $100,100,464.50 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical monthly compensation or a posted per-veteran figure. 12 awards against a one-and-two-tenth-billion-dollar VA cell is a thin file. Do not invent a base census or named veterans. Do not treat CO-05’s 64.109 cell as a synonym for every VA disability account nationwide. Open Colorado 5th District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 64.109 for CFDA 64.109 without the CO-05 filter, Colorado federal spending for every program in the Colorado extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $1,201,205,574.

CFDA 64.109 as the VA disability side

USAspending labels CFDA 64.109 as Veterans Compensation For Service-Connected Disability. That catalog number produced $1,201,205,574 when crossed with Colorado 5th District (CO-05) place of performance. The program-wide 64.109 hub does not require CO-05 geography. The district hub does not require VA disability. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 12 awards. The packet does not split rating percentages and does not publish a veteran denominator.

Correlation is not causation: Colorado 5th District (CO-05) did not “cause” $1,201,205,574 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 64.109 × CO-05 only. It is not a veteran headcount, a rating census, or a named-beneficiary file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Questions

How much VA disability spending is coded to Colorado 5th District (CO-05)?

USAspending.gov lists $1,201,205,574 in Veterans Compensation For Service-Connected Disability obligations across 12 awards with place of performance in Colorado 5th District (CO-05). CFDA 64.109 × CO-05 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not Colorado’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 4.9% of the district’s published total ($24,267,357,419.95). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $100,100,464.50, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $1,201,205,574 include every VA disability project in CO-05?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split rating percentages and does not publish a veteran denominator. $1,201,205,574 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 64.109 inside CO-05 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 64.109 and Colorado 5th District to inspect parent tables. 12 remains an action count, not a count of veterans, ratings, or claims.

Is $1,201,205,574 cash already paid in Colorado 5th District (CO-05)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $1,201,205,574 as checks already cleared in Colorado 5th District (CO-05) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 12 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

Where is the live VA disability–CO-05 table?

Colorado 5th District is the district parent and CFDA 64.109 is the program parent. Colorado federal spending covers Colorado without the district×program intersection as the headline. All spending ties lists other pairs. Those hubs are not addends. Keep both sides of the join when citing $1,201,205,574. Place of performance is CO-05. Obligations are not outlays.