North Carolina 3rd District

The North Carolina 3rd District (NC-03) filter on VA disability

CFDA 64.109 and congressional district NC-03 meet here. $1,116,446,432 is the USAspending.gov obligation sum on awards that carry both tags. It is not Veterans Compensation For Service-Connected Disability’s nationwide total, not every federal dollar coded to North Carolina 3rd District (NC-03), and not an outlay register. The packet does not split rating percentages and does not publish a veteran denominator. 130 is an action count: modifications and repeat awards add rows. Unique recipients are unpublished. It is not a veteran headcount, a rating census, or a named-beneficiary file.

Dividing $1,116,446,432 by 130 yields about $8,588,049.48 per award on average. That ratio is two packet facts. It is not a typical monthly compensation or a posted per-veteran figure. 130 awards is a moderate VA file. Volume pulls the implied mean down relative to CO-05’s thinner same-CFDA pair. Veterans remain unpublished. Do not treat NC-03’s 64.109 cell as a synonym for every VA disability account nationwide. Open North Carolina 3rd District for the district table without this program filter, CFDA 64.109 for CFDA 64.109 without the NC-03 filter, North Carolina federal spending for every program in the North Carolina extract, and All spending ties for the rest of the join list. Quote those hubs as parents, not as addends to $1,116,446,432.

The VA disability catalog line

USAspending labels CFDA 64.109 as Veterans Compensation For Service-Connected Disability. That catalog number produced $1,116,446,432 when crossed with North Carolina 3rd District (NC-03) place of performance. The program-wide 64.109 hub does not require NC-03 geography. The district hub does not require VA disability. Only this tie applies both filters, which is why it cites 130 awards. The packet does not split rating percentages and does not publish a veteran denominator.

Correlation is not causation: North Carolina 3rd District (NC-03) did not “cause” $1,116,446,432 by existing as a large or small place. Population, outcome scores, and named facilities are not packet facts. The join is 64.109 × NC-03 only. It is not a veteran headcount, a rating census, or a named-beneficiary file. Do not invent contractors or award recipients to fill the gap. Campaign donations on FEC tables do not fund this USAspending cell; the datasets are separate.

Questions

How much VA disability spending is coded to North Carolina 3rd District (NC-03)?

USAspending.gov lists $1,116,446,432 in Veterans Compensation For Service-Connected Disability obligations across 130 awards with place of performance in North Carolina 3rd District (NC-03). CFDA 64.109 × NC-03 is an obligation join, not an outlay and not North Carolina’s complete federal ledger. The cell is 7.9% of the district’s published total ($14,107,795,476.14). Unique recipients are unpublished. Average obligation is about $8,588,049.48, a ratio of those two facts only.

Does $1,116,446,432 include every VA disability project in NC-03?

The packet publishes one CFDA rollup. The packet does not split rating percentages and does not publish a veteran denominator. $1,116,446,432 is the combined obligation sum for CFDA 64.109 inside NC-03 coding. This page will not invent a project pie or name contractors. Open CFDA 64.109 and North Carolina 3rd District to inspect parent tables. 130 remains an action count, not a count of veterans, ratings, or claims.

Is $1,116,446,432 cash already paid in North Carolina 3rd District (NC-03)?

No. Obligations are commitments recorded on USAspending.gov awards. Outlays — money that actually left the Treasury — are a different concept and are not this packet’s headline. Treating $1,116,446,432 as checks already cleared in North Carolina 3rd District (NC-03) confuses those terms. Later ingests can revise 130 awards. Prefer the live district and program hubs if the tables moved.

Why is the implied average $8,588,049.48 not a typical award?

The average is $1,116,446,432 divided by 130 awards, about $8,588,049.48. Thick files pull the mean down; thin files pull it up. Neither case publishes a typical instrument. Modifications add rows. Recipients are unpublished. Use the ratio only as a concentration statistic.