Does Alaska or Mississippi have more federal spending?

Alaska leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $3.49B to Mississippi’s $2.88B. Alaska also leads spending per capita, $532.17 versus $115.31, on 740,133 residents against Mississippi’s 2,943,045. Mississippi has more awards (233,003 vs 25,423). FY2026 obligations are $393.9M in Alaska and $339.4M in Mississippi.

Why does Mississippi have so many more awards than Alaska?

The packet reports 233,003 awards in Mississippi and 25,423 in Alaska. Mississippi’s stacked stock is smaller ($2.88B vs $3.49B). Population is 2,943,045 versus 740,133. Award count is a row total, not average size. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

What industries lead in Alaska and Mississippi?

Alaska’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Mississippi’s is ship building and repairing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $3.49B and $2.88B. Award counts are 25,423 in Alaska and 233,003 in Mississippi.

Are Alaska vs Mississippi figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $3.49B and $2.88B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $393.9M and $339.4M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($532.17 vs $115.31) uses Census population where present.

← All guides

Alaska vs Mississippi on USAspending: $3.49B vs $2.88B

Alaska accounts for $3.49B in USAspending.gov obligations; Mississippi accounts for $2.88B. Mississippi has nearly four times the people—2,943,045 versus 740,133—and nearly ten times the awards: 233,003 against 25,423. Alaska’s spending per capita is $532.17 versus Mississippi’s $115.31. FY2026 obligations are $393.9M in Alaska and $339.4M in Mississippi. Commercial and institutional building construction leads Alaska; ship building and repairing leads Mississippi. The figures are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

Alaska $3.49B vs Mississippi $2.88B in stacked USAspending obligations.
Alaska per capita $532.17 vs Mississippi $115.31 on 740,133 vs 2,943,045 residents.
Awards: 25,423 vs 233,003; FY2026 $393.9M vs $339.4M.
Top industries: commercial construction in Alaska; ship building in Mississippi.
Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Alaska’s dollars versus Mississippi’s award mill

Alaska’s $3.49B is the larger stacked total on 740,133 residents. Mississippi’s $2.88B sits on 2,943,045. Intensity therefore favors Alaska: $532.17 per capita versus $115.31. The Gulf Census count does not produce the larger stock.

Award volume is the opposite story. Mississippi records 233,003 awards; Alaska records 25,423. Mississippi’s file is dense in rows on a smaller stock. Alaska’s 25,423 actions sit on $3.49B beside the $532.17 reading.

FY2026 stays close. $393.9M versus $339.4M keeps a slim Alaska dollar lead on the latest year. Cite USAspending.gov for both cuts. Outlays are not in the packet.

Alaska’s $3.49B on 740,133 residents and Mississippi’s $2.88B on 2,943,045 residents are USAspending.gov obligations. Ship building and repairing versus commercial and institutional building construction is mix on those stocks.

FY2026 of $393.9M versus $339.4M stays close. Award counts of 25,423 versus 233,003 do not. Read recency and rows as separate questions. Spending per capita of $532.17 versus $115.31 uses Census where present. Outlays are not in the packet.

Building construction versus ship repair

Alaska’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Mississippi’s top industry is ship building and repairing. Those peaks sit on $3.49B and $2.88B. Construction is a first read on Alaska’s mix; shipyards are a first read on Mississippi’s mix.

The 25,423 Alaska awards and 233,003 Mississippi awards include many actions outside those labels. Agency and recipient detail lives on the Alaska and Mississippi state hubs. Both mixes are USAspending.gov obligations.

A tight FY2026 race: $393.9M versus $339.4M

Fiscal year 2026 obligations are $393.9M in Alaska and $339.4M in Mississippi. Recency preserves Alaska’s stacked dollar lead without opening a large gap. Treat the year as a recency slice of obligations, not as Treasury cash.

Do not divide $393.9M or $339.4M by 25,423 or 233,003 all-years awards. Spending per capita of $532.17 and $115.31 already sits beside Census counts of 740,133 and 2,943,045.

Ten times the awards on a smaller stock

Mississippi’s 233,003 awards against Alaska’s 25,423 is the row gap. Dollars run the other way: $2.88B versus $3.49B. Population runs with the awards: 2,943,045 versus 740,133. Per capita runs with the dollars: $115.31 versus $532.17.

Keep those per-capita figures labeled as Census-based packet figures on USAspending.gov obligations. They are not outlays per resident.

Shipyard rows versus a small-Census dollar stock

Mississippi’s 233,003 awards on $2.88B against Alaska’s 25,423 awards on $3.49B is a row-versus-stock split. USAspending.gov obligations record both. Outlays do not appear.

Ship building and repairing leads Mississippi. Commercial and institutional building construction leads Alaska. FY2026 stays close: $393.9M versus $339.4M. Census counts of 740,133 and 2,943,045 explain why $532.17 per capita exceeds $115.31.

Do not divide $3.49B or $2.88B by those award counts. The packet has no average award size. Cite rows as rows and stocks as stocks.

FY2026 of $393.9M versus $339.4M is almost as close as the stacked ranking is not on intensity. Alaska’s $532.17 versus Mississippi’s $115.31 is the wide cut. Both are obligation readings with Census in the denominator where present.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Alaska and Mississippi hubs hold agencies and recipients. Cash outlays remain outside this packet.

How to read Alaska versus Mississippi

Read Alaska first on stacked dollars ($3.49B vs $2.88B), spending per capita ($532.17 vs $115.31), and FY2026 ($393.9M vs $339.4M). Read Mississippi first on population (2,943,045 vs 740,133) and awards (233,003 vs 25,423). Note construction versus ship building.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Alaska and Mississippi hubs hold agencies and recipients. Outlays are a different series.

Questions

Does Alaska or Mississippi have more federal spending?: Alaska leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $3.49B to Mississippi’s $2.88B. Alaska also leads spending per capita, $532.17 versus $115.31, on 740,133 residents against Mississippi’s 2,943,045. Mississippi has more awards (233,003 vs 25,423). FY2026 obligations are $393.9M in Alaska and $339.4M in Mississippi.
Why does Mississippi have so many more awards than Alaska?: The packet reports 233,003 awards in Mississippi and 25,423 in Alaska. Mississippi’s stacked stock is smaller ($2.88B vs $3.49B). Population is 2,943,045 versus 740,133. Award count is a row total, not average size. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
What industries lead in Alaska and Mississippi?: Alaska’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Mississippi’s is ship building and repairing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $3.49B and $2.88B. Award counts are 25,423 in Alaska and 233,003 in Mississippi.
Are Alaska vs Mississippi figures Treasury outlays?: No. The $3.49B and $2.88B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $393.9M and $339.4M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($532.17 vs $115.31) uses Census population where present.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.