FY2024 USAspending in Alabama District 07
Alabama District 07 shows $8.2 billion in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations for place of performance in the 7th district. The exact sum is $8,240,598,562.89 across 31,840 awards. Those dollars are award commitments, not outlays. AL-07 is a numbered House seat, not an unspecified 90 code. SpendingVault indexes the rows on the Alabama District 07 hub.
Key figures
- Alabama District 07 shows $8.2 billion in FY2024 place-of-performance obligations.
- 31,840 awards are counted for AL-07 in that FY2024 extract.
- District 07 is a numbered House seat, not a 90/98 unspecified bucket.
- Geography is place of performance, not recipient headquarters.
- Cite $8.2 billion as obligations, not outlays.
The $8.2 billion FY2024 commitment total
The $8.2 billion figure is the FY2024 obligation aggregate on awards whose place of performance is Alabama District 07. Obligation means a recorded commitment. It is not Treasury cash already paid, and it is not Alabama’s state budget. The matching record count is 31,840.
First year and last year are both 2024. Federal fiscal years begin on October 1. Later USAspending.gov corrections can revise $8,240,598,562.89 and the 31,840-award count. Until then, cite both as the FY2024 AL-07 place-of-performance stock.
Thirty-one thousand eight hundred forty award actions
31,840 is the FY2024 record count for AL-07 place of performance. Modifications and assistance actions can each add a row. The packet does not publish unique recipients or an agency mix. Do not treat 31,840 as 31,840 Alabama companies.
Do not divide $8.2 billion by 31,840 awards. That quotient is not in the packet. Keep the dollar total and the row count as separate facts and use the Alabama District 07 hub to inspect lines. A thick file can mix large and small actions; the packet does not identify which.
Performance geography, not a 7th-district HQ map
Even for a numbered Alabama seat, the district field is still place of performance, not recipient headquarters. A contractor based in another Alabama district or another state can appear on AL-07 if the performance location is coded to the 7th. A 7th-district headquarters can post dollars to another district when performance is coded there.
Alabama’s unspecified 90/98 rows, if present, stay on their own pages. Recipient-location maps are a different cut from this $8.2 billion file. HQ lists of “7th district contractors” will not match 31,840 performance-coded awards.
AL-07 versus leftover codes 90 and 98
Alabama District 07 is a mapped House district. District 90 and district 98 are USAspending unspecified and non-voting bins. AL-07 is the numbered 7th, not a leftover. Unspecified Alabama performance, if any, would live on a 90 page rather than inside this table.
The Alabama state hub is the statewide obligation view. AL-07 is the 7th-district place-of-performance page. They are related but not interchangeable. This packet does not quote a statewide Alabama total and does not rank the 7th against other districts.
Obligations versus outlays
The $8.2 billion total is the obligation series. Outlays measure disbursements and can lag. SpendingVault does not recast AL-07 as cash paid. If another Alabama headline disagrees, check series, fiscal year, and whether geography is performance or HQ.
The precise FY2024 statement is that agencies obligated $8.2 billion on 31,840 awards with AL-07 place of performance. Multi-year vehicles can obligate here and invoice later. Federal FY2024 starts October 1.
How to quote Alabama’s 7th without mixing codes
A complete AL-07 citation names numbered District 07, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $8.2 billion, and 31,840 awards. Calling the code unspecified would confuse it with district 90.
The Alabama District 07 hub is the table. The Alabama state page is the statewide roll-up. The all-districts index lists other Alabama seats in the same format. Outlay tables, headquarters maps, and calendar-year charts are other products. Do not drop $8,240,598,562.89 onto those grids unless they already use place of performance, federal FY2024, and obligations.
Alabama District 07 can be briefed as $8.2 billion in FY2024 obligations on 31,840 awards with numbered code AL-07. Treat 31,840 as an action stock, not unique vendors. Keep other Alabama numbered districts and any District 90 leftover on other rows. What this packet supplies is AL-07 place-of-performance commitments from USAspending.gov, not outlays, not a headquarters extract, and not a multi-year series. A headquarters in the 7th without an AL-07 tag does not enter this file.
Questions
- How much federal spending is in Alabama District 07?
- USAspending.gov shows $8.2 billion in FY2024 obligations with place of performance in Alabama District 07. The exact sum is $8,240,598,562.89. That is not an outlay total and not Alabama’s state budget. The extract counts 31,840 awards for AL-07 in FY2024. The packet year range is FY2024 only.
- Is Alabama District 07 an unspecified 90 bucket?
- No. District 07 is a numbered voting House seat. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting buckets. The $8.2 billion total uses the AL-07 place-of-performance code. 31,840 awards share that same numbered tag.
- Are Alabama 7th-district dollars based on contractor headquarters?
- No. The district is place of performance. Recipients based outside the 7th can still appear on AL-07 if the performance location is coded to the 7th. A 7th-district headquarters can also map dollars to another district when performance is coded there.
- Is $8.2 billion in AL-07 already paid out?
- No. $8.2 billion is an obligation sum from FY2024 award records. Outlays are a different series. SpendingVault does not convert the Alabama 7th-district obligation total into Treasury outlays. Cite the figure with the obligation label, the FY2024 window, and AL-07 place of performance.
Congressional district is USAspending place-of-performance, not the recipient HQ. District 90/98 are USAspending unspecified/non-voting buckets.