Does Arkansas or Oregon have more federal spending?

Oregon leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $2.67B to Arkansas’s $1.72B. Arkansas leads spending per capita, $85.06 versus $56.06, and awards, 79,590 versus 36,965. Oregon has more residents (4,272,371 vs 3,088,354). FY2026 obligations are $262.7M in Arkansas and $239.5M in Oregon.

Why does Arkansas have more awards than Oregon?

The packet reports 79,590 awards in Arkansas and 36,965 in Oregon. Arkansas’s stacked stock is smaller ($1.72B vs $2.67B). Population is 3,088,354 versus 4,272,371. Award count is a row total, not average size. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

What industries lead in Arkansas and Oregon?

Arkansas’s top industry is poultry processing. Oregon’s is support activities for forestry. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $1.72B and $2.67B. Award counts are 79,590 in Arkansas and 36,965 in Oregon These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

Are Arkansas vs Oregon figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $1.72B and $2.67B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $262.7M and $239.5M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($85.06 vs $56.06) uses Census population where present.

← All guides

Arkansas vs Oregon on USAspending: $1.72B vs $2.67B

Oregon’s USAspending.gov obligation stock is $2.67B; Arkansas’s is $1.72B. Oregon has more people—4,272,371 versus 3,088,354—while Arkansas posts the higher spending per capita, $85.06 versus $56.06, and more than twice the awards: 79,590 against 36,965. FY2026 obligations are $262.7M in Arkansas and $239.5M in Oregon. Poultry processing leads Arkansas; support activities for forestry lead Oregon. The series is obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

Oregon $2.67B vs Arkansas $1.72B in stacked USAspending obligations.
Arkansas per capita $85.06 vs Oregon $56.06 on 3,088,354 vs 4,272,371 residents.
Awards: 79,590 vs 36,965; FY2026 $262.7M vs $239.5M.
Top industries: poultry processing in Arkansas; forestry support in Oregon.
Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Oregon’s larger stock, Arkansas’s denser file

Oregon’s $2.67B is the larger stacked total. Arkansas’s $1.72B sits on 3,088,354 residents against 4,272,371. Intensity still favors Arkansas: $85.06 per capita versus $56.06. Oregon’s extra people produce the larger stock and the cooler ratio.

Award volume favors Arkansas, 79,590 versus 36,965. Arkansas’s file is denser in rows on a smaller stock. Oregon’s 36,965 actions sit on $2.67B.

FY2026 is a slim Arkansas recency lead: $262.7M versus $239.5M. Cite USAspending.gov for the stacked stocks and the latest-year amounts.

Arkansas’s 79,590 awards on $1.72B against Oregon’s 36,965 awards on $2.67B split volume and stock. Arkansas’s $85.06 per capita and $262.7M FY2026 slice also exceed Oregon’s $56.06 and $239.5M. Oregon still holds the larger stacked stock. All dollar cuts are USAspending.gov obligations.

Poultry processing versus support activities for forestry is mix. Census counts of 3,088,354 and 4,272,371 already sit in the packet. Outlays are not listed. Cite USAspending.gov.

Poultry processing versus forestry support

Arkansas’s lead NAICS is poultry processing. Oregon’s lead NAICS is support activities for forestry. Those peaks sit on $1.72B and $2.67B. Poultry processing is a first read on Arkansas’s mix; forestry support is a first read on Oregon’s mix.

The 79,590 Arkansas awards and 36,965 Oregon awards include many actions outside those labels. Use the Arkansas and Oregon state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes.

FY2026: $262.7M versus $239.5M

Fiscal year 2026 obligations are $262.7M in Arkansas and $239.5M in Oregon. Recency does not preserve Oregon’s stacked dollar lead. Treat the year as a recency slice of obligations, not as Treasury cash.

Do not divide $262.7M or $239.5M by 79,590 or 36,965 all-years awards. Spending per capita of $85.06 and $56.06 already sits beside Census counts of 3,088,354 and 4,272,371.

Poultry processing rows on a smaller Arkansas stock

Arkansas’s 79,590 awards on $1.72B exceed Oregon’s 36,965 awards on $2.67B. More rows, fewer dollars. Arkansas also posts $85.06 per capita on 3,088,354 residents against Oregon’s $56.06 on 4,272,371. All dollar cuts are USAspending.gov obligations.

Poultry processing leads Arkansas. Support activities for forestry lead Oregon. FY2026 of $262.7M versus $239.5M is a slim Arkansas recency lead on a smaller stacked stock.

Outlays are not in the packet. Do not invent average award size. Cite USAspending.gov for $1.72B and $2.67B as commitments, not cash paid.

Pacific stock, Delta recency

Oregon’s $2.67B remains the larger all-years total. Arkansas’s $262.7M FY2026 slice edges Oregon’s $239.5M. Read stacked ranking and recency as separate questions inside one obligation series.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Arkansas and Oregon hubs hold agencies and recipients. Keep $85.06 and $56.06 labeled as Census-based obligation ratios.

How to read Arkansas versus Oregon

Read Oregon first on stacked dollars ($2.67B vs $1.72B) and population (4,272,371 vs 3,088,354). Read Arkansas first on spending per capita ($85.06 vs $56.06), awards (79,590 vs 36,965), and FY2026 ($262.7M vs $239.5M). Note poultry processing versus forestry support.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Arkansas and Oregon hubs hold agencies and recipients. Outlays are a different series. Keep per-capita figures labeled as Census-based packet figures on USAspending.gov obligations.

Arkansas’s 79,590 awards, $85.06 per capita, and $262.7M FY2026 slice sit against Oregon’s larger $2.67B stock. Poultry processing versus support activities for forestry is mix. Cite USAspending.gov. Outlays are not in the packet.

Questions

Does Arkansas or Oregon have more federal spending?: Oregon leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $2.67B to Arkansas’s $1.72B. Arkansas leads spending per capita, $85.06 versus $56.06, and awards, 79,590 versus 36,965. Oregon has more residents (4,272,371 vs 3,088,354). FY2026 obligations are $262.7M in Arkansas and $239.5M in Oregon.
Why does Arkansas have more awards than Oregon?: The packet reports 79,590 awards in Arkansas and 36,965 in Oregon. Arkansas’s stacked stock is smaller ($1.72B vs $2.67B). Population is 3,088,354 versus 4,272,371. Award count is a row total, not average size. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
What industries lead in Arkansas and Oregon?: Arkansas’s top industry is poultry processing. Oregon’s is support activities for forestry. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $1.72B and $2.67B. Award counts are 79,590 in Arkansas and 36,965 in Oregon These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
Are Arkansas vs Oregon figures Treasury outlays?: No. The $1.72B and $2.67B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $262.7M and $239.5M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($85.06 vs $56.06) uses Census population where present.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.