Arizona vs Maryland on USAspending: $13.1B vs $30.1B

Arizona’s $435.71 vs Maryland’s $315.60

Spending per capita is $435.71 in Arizona and $315.60 in Maryland. That intensity ranking does not have to match the stacked dollar ranking of $13.1B versus $30.1B. When people (7,582,384 vs 6,263,220) diverge faster or slower than obligations, per capita flips. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award.

Arizona wins intensity and FY2026; Maryland wins stock and rows. Intensity is stacked obligations divided by Census counts. It is not FY2026 alone. It is not GDP. It is not a household check.

Health-insurance carriers vs computer services

Award counts are 118,504 in Arizona and 229,316 in Maryland. Rows can follow dollars, follow people, or follow neither. A flip pair often shows that third path. Direct health and medical insurance carriers on 118,504 Arizona awards versus other computer related services on 229,316 Maryland awards is a coverage-versus-services split. Recency ($3.3B vs $2.0B) disagrees with stacked $13.1B versus $30.1B.

Arizona’s top industry is direct health and medical insurance carriers. Maryland’s top industry is other computer related services. Mix can help explain a heavier typical action, but it does not compute $435.71 or $315.60. Those ratios are arithmetic on $13.1B, $30.1B, 7,582,384, and 6,263,220.

FY2026: $3.3B in Arizona vs $2.0B in Maryland

FY2026 obligations are $3.3B and $2.0B. Recency can narrow a stacked gap without erasing an intensity flip, or it can restock the same leaders. Keep the latest year separate from $13.1B versus $30.1B.

Do not divide FY2026 amounts by 118,504 or 229,316 all-years awards. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award.

Fewer Arizona awards on a hotter ratio

The useful sentence for a flip pair is not “who is bigger.” It is which ranking a reader needs: stock ($13.1B vs $30.1B), intensity ($435.71 vs $315.60), rows (118,504 vs 229,316), or recency ($3.3B vs $2.0B).

Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the Arizona and Maryland state hubs for agencies and recipients. direct health and medical insurance carriers versus other computer related services remains the mix note on those rankings.

How to read Arizona against Maryland

Hold the inversion: the state that trails $13.1B versus $30.1B may still lead $435.71 versus $315.60, or the reverse. Populations of 7,582,384 and 6,263,220 are the denominators that make that possible.

FY2026 ($3.3B vs $2.0B) is recency on the same USAspending.gov obligations series. Outlays are a different series. Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the Arizona and Maryland state hubs for agencies and recipients.

Maryland’s stock, Arizona’s intensity and recency

Maryland’s $30.1B versus Arizona’s $13.1B and 229,316 versus 118,504 awards are the stacked and row leads. Arizona’s $435.71 versus $315.60 on 7,582,384 versus 6,263,220 residents and FY2026 $3.3B versus $2.0B are the flips. Insurance carriers versus computer services is mix. Those figures remain obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Four rankings, two leaders. Both files are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays. Use the Arizona and Maryland hubs for agencies and recipients.

Arizona versus Maryland on USAspending.gov is $13.1B versus $30.1B in stacked obligations, 118,504 versus 229,316 awards, 7,582,384 versus 6,263,220 residents, $435.71 versus $315.60 per capita, and $3.3B versus $2.0B in FY2026. Top industries remain direct health and medical insurance carriers and other computer related services. Those cuts are the packet.

Do not divide FY2026 dollars by all-years award counts. Do not treat $435.71 and $315.60 as household income. Do not treat direct health and medical insurance carriers or other computer related services as a complete industrial census. Place of performance can differ from headquarters. Cash outlays can lag. After the comparison table, the Arizona and Maryland state hubs hold agencies and recipients. FY2026 still shows $3.3B in Arizona and $2.0B in Maryland, a recency lead for the state that trails Maryland’s $30.1B stacked stock.

Questions

Which has more federal spending, Arizona or Maryland?

Arizona shows $13.1B in USAspending.gov obligations; Maryland shows $30.1B. Award counts are 118,504 and 229,316. Populations are 7,582,384 and 6,263,220. Spending per capita is $435.71 versus $315.60. FY2026 obligations are $3.3B and $2.0B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

What industries lead Arizona and Maryland federal awards?

Arizona’s top industry is direct health and medical insurance carriers. Maryland’s top industry is other computer related services. Those slices sit on $13.1B and $30.1B in USAspending.gov obligations and on 118,504 versus 229,316 awards. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award.

How do Arizona and Maryland compare on spending per capita?

Spending per capita is $435.71 in Arizona on 7,582,384 residents and $315.60 in Maryland on 6,263,220 residents. Those ratios use stacked USAspending.gov obligations of $13.1B and $30.1B, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Are Arizona vs Maryland figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $13.1B and $30.1B stacked totals, and FY2026 amounts of $3.3B and $2.0B, are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Award counts are 118,504 and 229,316. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.