Arizona vs Missouri on USAspending: $13.1B vs $10.4B

Arizona’s $13.1B versus Missouri’s $10.4B

These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Arizona’s $13.1B is about 1.3 times Missouri’s $10.4B. The comparison scores place of performance in the award file. Among two mid-size states, the award-dollar lead belongs to Arizona in this aggregate even though Missouri’s row count is much higher.

Award counts favor Missouri. Missouri has 300,867 awards; Arizona has 118,504. Missouri’s file is busier in rows and lighter in dollars. Arizona’s $13.1B on 118,504 actions implies a heavier typical booking than Missouri’s $10.4B on 300,867 records. Dollars and rows do not tell the same story.

Arizona’s $435.71 versus Missouri’s $262.46

Arizona’s 7,582,384 residents exceed Missouri’s 6,245,466. After dividing the obligation stocks by those Census counts, Arizona shows $435.71 per capita and Missouri shows $262.46. Intensity favors Arizona in the same direction as the $13.1B versus $10.4B ranking. Similar Census counts still produce different intensity.

A $435.71 per-person reading in Arizona on 7,582,384 residents is an intensity fact attached to $13.1B. Missouri’s $262.46 on 6,245,466 residents is attached to $10.4B. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not GDP. The per-capita gap is wider than the population gap.

Health insurers in Arizona, aircraft in Missouri

Arizona’s top industry is direct health and medical insurance carriers. Missouri’s is aircraft manufacturing. Those labels mark the largest NAICS slice in each state’s file, not a full industrial census. Insurance-carrier awards and aircraft awards are different lead products sitting on $13.1B and $10.4B.

A health-insurance lead can concentrate large medical-coverage actions inside Arizona’s 118,504-award file. An aircraft-manufacturing lead can concentrate large production awards inside Missouri’s 300,867-award file. Mix and scale both differ. Neither industry name explains every dollar.

FY2026: $3.3B in Arizona vs $1.6B in Missouri

FY2026 obligations are $3.3B in Arizona and $1.6B in Missouri. Arizona’s latest year remains well ahead, widening the stacked $13.1B versus $10.4B ranking. Recency questions belong in FY2026. The stacked totals remain the full USAspending.gov aggregate this comparison uses. Both years are obligations, not outlays.

Do not divide those FY figures by Arizona’s 118,504 or Missouri’s 300,867 all-years awards. Per capita of $435.71 on 7,582,384 residents versus $262.46 on 6,245,466 residents is the intensity comparison. Both cuts are USAspending.gov obligations.

Similar size, different files

Arizona leads stacked dollars ($13.1B vs $10.4B), population (7,582,384 vs 6,245,466), per capita ($435.71 vs $262.46), and FY2026 ($3.3B vs $1.6B). Missouri leads award count (300,867 vs 118,504). That row inversion on a smaller dollar stock is the distinctive fact in this pair.

Direct health and medical insurance carriers versus aircraft manufacturing is mix inside files that contain many other industries. Use the Arizona and Missouri hubs for agencies and recipients. Keep $13.1B and $10.4B labeled as obligations.

How to use the Arizona and Missouri hubs

Arizona’s $13.1B on 118,504 awards versus Missouri’s $10.4B on 300,867 awards is a mid-size pair with inverted rows. Census counts of 7,582,384 and 6,245,466 are close; per capita of $435.71 versus $262.46 is not. Open the Arizona hub and the Missouri hub for agencies and recipients. Direct health and medical insurance carriers versus aircraft manufacturing is mix, not a census.

FY2026’s $3.3B versus $1.6B widens Arizona’s stacked lead. These are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays. Do not divide latest-year dollars by all-years award counts. Place of performance can differ from where the paying agency sits. Use the hubs for the next drill-down. Keep $13.1B and $10.4B labeled as obligations so similar Census counts are not mistaken for similar files.

Arizona versus Missouri is similar Census counts of 7,582,384 and 6,245,466 with inverted rows: 118,504 awards on $13.1B against 300,867 awards on $10.4B. Direct health and medical insurance carriers and aircraft manufacturing are lead slices. FY2026 of $3.3B versus $1.6B widens Arizona’s lead. Per capita is $435.71 versus $262.46. Obligations remain the unit. The Arizona and Missouri hubs hold the next tables. Arizona’s 118,504 awards on $13.1B versus Missouri’s 300,867 awards on $10.4B is the row inversion. FY2026’s $3.3B versus $1.6B widens Arizona’s stacked lead. Per capita of $435.71 versus $262.46 sits on 7,582,384 and 6,245,466 residents. Keep $13.1B and $10.4B labeled as USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Questions

Which state has more federal spending, Arizona or Missouri?

Arizona leads in USAspending.gov obligations: $13.1B versus Missouri’s $10.4B. Missouri has more awards (300,867 vs 118,504). Populations are 7,582,384 in Arizona and 6,245,466 in Missouri. Spending per capita is $435.71 in Arizona and $262.46 in Missouri. FY2026 obligations are $3.3B and $1.6B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Why does Missouri have more awards than Arizona but fewer dollars?

Missouri logs 300,867 awards on $10.4B. Arizona logs 118,504 awards on $13.1B. Missouri’s file is busier in rows and lighter in dollars, which implies a smaller typical booking. Populations are close (6,245,466 vs 7,582,384). Per capita is $262.46 versus $435.71. FY2026 also favors Arizona ($3.3B vs $1.6B).

What industries lead Arizona and Missouri federal awards?

Arizona’s top industry is direct health and medical insurance carriers. Missouri’s is aircraft manufacturing. Those slices sit on $13.1B and $10.4B in obligations. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award in either state. Award counts are 118,504 in Arizona and 300,867 in Missouri.

Are Arizona vs Missouri figures Treasury outlays?

No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $13.1B and $10.4B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $3.3B and $1.6B measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments. Place of performance can differ from where the paying agency sits.