USAspending in California District 12, FY2024

Five thousand thirty-six awards, $23.5 billion obligated

USAspending.gov ties 5,036 award records to California District 12 place of performance in FY2024. Those records sum to $23.5 billion in obligations. Five thousand thirty-six is a modest row count beside a large dollar stock. The packet does not break the file by agency or award type, so the mix stays on the hub table.

Row count is not unique vendors. The same recipient can appear on many awards. Do not divide $23.5 billion by 5,036 and treat the quotient as a typical contract. That math is not in the packet.

Performance tagged to CA-12

The district field is place of performance. Recipients headquartered outside District 12 can still appear in the $23.5 billion if USAspending codes the work to CA-12. California-based firms can be missing when performance is tagged to California District 06, District 17, District 16, California’s 90 leftover, or another state.

HQ lists of “12th district contractors” will not reproduce this extract. The page answers where performance was coded, not where the vendor’s mailroom sits. This packet does not quote those other districts’ dollars.

Mapped House seat, not a residual bin

California District 12 is a voting congressional district. USAspending uses 90 and 98 for unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance buckets. This hub’s $23.5 billion is mapped to numbered code 12. Residual California performance would sit on a 90 page if that code exists in the source file.

The California state page is the statewide place-of-performance rollup. It will not match $23.5 billion. Use the all-districts index to compare formats across seats.

FY2024 obligations only

First year and last year are both 2024. There is no District 12 year-over-year series in these facts. Federal FY2024 starts October 1. Later source corrections can revise $23.5 billion and the 5,036-award count.

Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. SpendingVault does not convert the CA-12 total into cash disbursed inside the 12th district. Cite $23,541,852,477 as FY2024 obligations with CA-12 place of performance.

California hubs next to this page

The California District 12 hub is the table. The California state page rolls statewide performance. The all-districts index lists other California numbered districts and unspecified 90/98 codes. None of those other pages’ dollars are inside this packet.

What the CA-12 citation should include

Name California District 12, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $23.5 billion, and 5,036 awards. Keep the code on a numbered-seat row, not on a 90/98 residual line. Headquarters without a CA-12 tag do not enter the file.

The 5,036-award count is a single-year record stock. It is not 5,036 unique companies. The California District 12 hub is the place to inspect the mix; this guide only certifies the two rollup facts and the FY2024 window.

California District 12 can be briefed as $23.5 billion in FY2024 obligations on 5,036 awards with numbered code CA-12. The 5,036-award count is thin beside $23.5 billion. That pairing is a file-structure fact, not a unique-vendor rate and not an average award size — those figures are not in the packet. Keep other California numbered districts and any District 90 leftover on other rows. None of their totals sits inside $23.5 billion. This packet does not supply those other dollars. What it supplies is CA-12 place-of-performance commitments from USAspending.gov, not outlays, not a headquarters extract, and not a multi-year series. A headquarters in the 12th without a CA-12 tag does not enter this file. Work coded to CA-12 from a vendor based elsewhere does enter $23.5 billion. The California state page rolls all California codes and will not equal $23.5 billion. FY2024 is the only year in the facts. Federal FY2024 starts October 1. Later USAspending corrections can revise both the dollar sum and the award count. Until a later extract, report $23.5 billion and 5,036 awards for CA-12 place of performance as obligations, not outlays.

California District 12 remains a numbered-seat extract: $23.5 billion in FY2024 obligations on 5,036 awards with CA-12 place of performance. Five thousand thirty-six is a thin action stock beside that dollar total. Keep other California numbered districts and any District 90 leftover on other rows. The California state page will not equal $23.5 billion. Cite obligations, not outlays, FY2024 only, USAspending.gov.

Questions

How much federal spending is in California District 12?

USAspending.gov records $23.5 billion in FY2024 obligations with California District 12 place of performance, across 5,036 awards. That is not an outlay total and not a headquarters extract. The packet year range is FY2024 only. Those figures are FY2024 USAspending obligations with CA-12 place of performance, covering 5,036 awards, not outlays and not a headquarters extract.

Is California District 12 a 90 unspecified bucket?

No. District 12 is a numbered California House seat. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting bins. The $23.5 billion total uses the CA-12 place-of-performance code. 5,036 awards share that tag. Keep $23.5 billion and 5,036 as separate certified facts from USAspending.gov for fiscal year 2024 only.

Why are there only 5,036 awards next to $23.5 billion?

That is the FY2024 award-record count for the CA-12 performance code. It is not a unique-vendor count. The packet does not publish an average award size. Keep $23.5 billion and 5,036 as separate facts. The CA-12 tag is the geography rule; an office address in California is neither required nor enough to enter the 5,036 records.

Are California District 12 dollars based on contractor HQ?

No. The district is place of performance. Recipients based outside the 12th can still appear if performance is coded CA-12. A District 12 headquarters can map dollars to another district when performance is coded there. Cite the figure with the obligation label, the FY2024 window, and CA-12 place of performance rather than recipient headquarters.