Skip to main content
← All guides

FY2024 obligations with performance in California District 28

USAspending.gov attributes $29.7 billion in FY2024 federal obligations to place of performance in California’s 28th congressional district. That total is obligations, not outlays. 3,290 awards share the CA-28 performance tag — a smaller record count next to the dollar total. SpendingVault indexes those records on the California District 28 hub. California District 28 is not CA-36, CA-50, or a 90 bucket. Keep $29.7 billion and 3,290 awards on the 28th district’s FY2024 place-of-performance obligation hub. The smaller row count does not shrink the obligation total into an average.

Key figures

  • FY2024 place-of-performance obligations in California District 28 total $29.7 billion.
  • The extract counts 3,290 awards for CA-28.
  • Geography is USAspending place of performance, not HQ.
  • CA-28 is a mapped House district, not a 90/98 bucket.
  • Cite $29.7 billion as obligations, not outlays.

$29.7 billion on the FY2024 award file

The $29.7 billion figure is the obligation sum for awards whose USAspending place of performance is California District 28 in fiscal year 2024. A commitment on an award record is not the same as a Treasury disbursement. California’s state budget is another series and is not this total. California District 28’s $29.7 billion is the FY2024 obligation roll-up for that mapped seat. The 3,290-award count is smaller than many California extracts, still a separate column from the dollars. This is not CA-36 or CA-50.

First year and last year in the packet are both 2024. Do not treat $29.7 billion as a three-year stack. Federal FY2024 starts October 1. USAspending.gov can still correct rows, which would move the indexed $29.7 billion and the 3,290-award count. Federal FY2024 is the entire year window. A calendar-year 2024 chart is a different cut. Keep 3,290 awards with $29.7 billion as FY2024 facts.

CA-28 as a performance map, not an HQ map

Place of performance is the geography this page uses. Recipient headquarters can sit in Los Angeles County, another California district, or another state while the work is coded CA-28. The opposite pattern also appears: a District 28 address on the recipient file does not force every dollar onto this page. Place of performance, not a Los Angeles mailing address, fills the 3,290-row table. Headquarters elsewhere can still appear if the work is coded CA-28.

District 28 is a numbered House seat, not California District 36 and not District 50. California dollars that USAspending could not map to a voting district are stored in district 90 (unspecified) or 98 (non-voting). Those buckets are separate pages, not hidden rows inside CA-28. CA-28 is a numbered House seat. Residual unmapped California performance stays off this hub. The $29.7 billion total is the mapped 28th district only.

3,290 award rows in District 28

3,290 awards is a FY2024 record count for CA-28 place of performance. That is a smaller row volume than many California district extracts, sitting next to $29.7 billion in obligations. The packet does not rank District 28 and does not invent a typical award from those two figures. Modifications and assistance actions can each add a line.

Keep the two figures side by side. A smaller row count does not, by itself, explain the dollar total. The California District 28 hub is the table of records, not a derived average.

3,290 is a smaller record count than many California district extracts, still not unique vendors. The California District 28 hub is the table. $29.7 billion stays the FY2024 obligation roll-up, a separate column from the row count.

Obligation series only

SpendingVault’s CA-28 copy cites obligations: $29.7 billion committed in FY2024 award files. Outlays are cash out the door and can lag. Mixing the two series makes District 28 look inconsistent when the files are simply measuring different events.

If a California spending chart uses recipient location or calendar year 2024, it is not this page. Stay with place of performance, FY2024, and obligations when quoting $29.7 billion.

Cite CA-28 as FY2024 USAspending.gov place-of-performance obligations of $29.7 billion on 3,290 awards. Do not divide the figures. Do not mix this hub with District 36 or District 50.

California statewide hub versus CA-28

The California state page is the statewide obligation index. District 28 is one mapped performance district inside California. Statewide California includes other districts and any unspecified buckets; this packet does not quote that statewide sum.

Use the all-districts index to open other California place-of-performance pages in the same format. Compare on FY2024 obligations only. This file does not publish a rank for CA-28.

California’s other mapped seats have their own pages. Statewide California is another page. This packet does not quote those other sums. Use CA-28 only for the 28th district file.

Reading a smaller row count beside $29.7 billion

The 3,290-award count for CA-28 is FY2024 record volume, not a statement that the $29.7 billion is concentrated or typical. SpendingVault indexes those rows as a count. This packet does not invent an average from the two columns.

Comparisons already built on recipient ZIP, calendar year, or Treasury outlays need a rebuild before $29.7 billion belongs next to them. The California state hub and the all-districts index stay on obligations.

Questions

How much federal spending is in California’s 28th district?
USAspending.gov records $29.7 billion in FY2024 obligations with place of performance in California District 28. That is not an outlay total and not California’s state budget. The matching award count is 3,290 for FY2024. First year and last year are both 2024.
Does CA-28 mean the recipient is headquartered in the 28th district?
No. USAspending codes the district by place of performance. A recipient based outside CA-28 can still appear if the performance location is the 28th district. A CA-28 mailing address can also send dollars to other districts when performance is coded there.
Is the $29.7 billion for California District 28 cash paid?
No. $29.7 billion is an obligation aggregate. Outlays are a separate USAspending series. SpendingVault does not convert CA-28 obligations into Treasury outlays. Cite the figure with the obligation label and the FY2024 window. Cite California District 28 as FY2024 place-of-performance obligations; do not invent an average from $29.7 billion and 3,290 awards.
How many awards are tagged to California District 28?
3,290 awards are counted for CA-28 place of performance in FY2024. That is a record count, including modifications, not a unique-recipient roster. This packet does not invent a typical award from $29.7 billion and 3,290 rows. Cite California District 28 as FY2024 place-of-performance obligations; do not invent an average from $29.7 billion and 3,290 awards.

Congressional district is USAspending place-of-performance, not the recipient HQ. District 90/98 are USAspending unspecified/non-voting buckets.