Skip to main content
← All guides

FY2024 USAspending in California’s 52nd district

Place of performance in California’s 52nd congressional district accounts for $15.9 billion in FY2024 federal obligations on USAspending.gov. SpendingVault reports that amount as obligations, not outlays. 4,323 awards carry the CA-52 performance code. California’s 52nd district shows a short row file for the dollars involved: 4,323 awards against $15.9 billion. CA-52 is a numbered House seat, not a 90 unspecified leftover or a 98 non-voting bin. The California District 52 hub holds the indexed rows for that mapped geography.

Key figures

  • FY2024 place-of-performance obligations in California District 52 total $15.9 billion.
  • 4,323 awards share the CA-52 tag in that extract.
  • District geography is performance location, not HQ.
  • CA-52 is a mapped House district, not a 90/98 bucket.
  • Cite $15.9 billion as obligations, not outlays.

The $15.9 billion FY2024 obligation file

$15.9 billion is the obligation total USAspending.gov attaches to California District 52 for fiscal year 2024. The figure is a sum of award commitments, not cash already paid and not California’s state budget. This page does not translate $15.9 billion into outlays. CA-52’s $15.9 billion is the FY2024 obligation file for that mapped seat. It is not a 90 unspecified bin and not a 98 non-voting bin. 4,323 awards are the matching count.

The packet’s year window is FY2024 only. First year and last year are both 2024. Federal fiscal years start October 1. USAspending.gov can still correct records, which would move $15.9 billion and the 4,323-award count. There is no FY2025 figure in this packet to add to $15.9 billion. Cite the year as federal FY2024 when the 4,323-award count is reused. Do not treat $15.9 billion as a calendar-year 2024 total.

CA-52 place of performance versus headquarters

Congressional district here is the USAspending place-of-performance field. A performance site coded to the 52nd district can appear even when the recipient’s headquarters sits in another California district or another state. A firm with a CA-52 mailing address can also post dollars elsewhere if performance is coded there. A recipient based outside the 52nd district can still appear among the 4,323 rows if place of performance is CA-52. Headquarters is the wrong join key.

District 52 is a numbered House seat. California rows that never received a voting-district number sit in district 90 (unspecified) or 98 (non-voting). Those buckets are not this CA-52 table. Do not merge this page with other California mapped seats. Unspecified California performance uses district 90, not this $15.9 billion mapped hub. Keep 4,323 awards on the 52nd district’s performance code.

4,323 awards on a short CA-52 extract

4,323 is a relatively short FY2024 record count for CA-52 place of performance beside $15.9 billion. A short extract can still include modifications. The packet does not publish unique recipients or an awarding-agency mix, so any reading of concentration is a comment on row count, not a named-vendor claim. Do not compute a typical award from $15.9 billion and 4,323 rows. That quotient is not a packet fact. Use the California District 52 hub to read individual records. $15.9 billion stays the FY2024 obligation roll-up for CA-52.

4,323 remains a record count. Modifications can add rows without turning the extract into a unique-firm list. The California District 52 hub is the table. $15.9 billion stays the FY2024 obligation roll-up for CA-52. If another briefing quotes a different California district, that is a different hub with its own packet — not a correction to 4,323 or $15.9 billion.

Obligations, not Treasury outlays

The $15.9 billion total is the obligation series. Outlays measure disbursements and can land in a later fiscal year. Mixing series makes CA-52 look inconsistent when the files are simply counting different events. SpendingVault does not recast this district as cash paid. A FY2024 obligation can fund later invoices; a later modification can change net amounts without turning this page into a cash register.

Recipient-location maps, calendar-year totals, and state budget documents are other products. Match geography, year, and series before treating a disagreement with $15.9 billion as an error. Cite CA-52 as FY2024 USAspending.gov place-of-performance obligations of $15.9 billion on 4,323 awards. Do not mix that total into an outlay sheet or a headquarters extract.

California statewide and the district index

California’s state hub is the statewide obligation view. CA-52 is one mapped place-of-performance district inside that state. Statewide California is not equal to District 52. Other California mapped seats have their own hubs; this packet does not quote those other figures. Stay on CA-52 for the 52nd district file.

The all-districts index lists other California seats and unspecified buckets in the same format. Compare CA-52 only on FY2024 obligations. This packet does not rank the 52nd district. Numbered seats and 90/98 leftovers are listed side by side in that index; they are not interchangeable geographies.

Keeping California District 52 on one series

The $15.9 billion FY2024 obligation total for CA-52 is an indexed USAspending.gov statistic. SpendingVault does not convert 4,323 awards into unique firms or cash paid, and it does not merge District 52 with a 90 leftover page. A complete citation names the 52nd district, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $15.9 billion, and 4,323 awards.

Align comparisons to place of performance, federal FY2024, and obligations before placing $15.9 billion next to another California column. The California state hub and the all-districts index use the same rules. CA-52’s $15.9 billion and 4,323 awards stay on this page. Do not recode this extract as outlays, and do not treat district 52 as an unspecified bucket.

Questions

How much federal spending is in California’s 52nd district?
USAspending.gov shows $15.9 billion in FY2024 obligations with place of performance in California District 52. That is not an outlay total and not California’s state budget. The same extract counts 4,323 awards for CA-52. First year and last year are both 2024. Cite the figure as place-of-performance obligations, not headquarters spending.
Does CA-52 spending mean the contractor is based there?
No. The district is USAspending place of performance, not recipient headquarters. Work coded to California’s 52nd district can belong to a recipient based in another district or another state. A CA-52 mailing address does not force every dollar onto this hub. Only the performance tag puts an award among the 4,323 records.
Are California District 52’s $15.9 billion outlays?
No. $15.9 billion is an obligation sum from FY2024 award records. Outlays are cash leaving the Treasury. SpendingVault does not convert CA-52 obligations into outlays. Keep the obligation label and the FY2024 window when the figure is reused. The matching award count is 4,323.
How many awards are tagged to California District 52?
4,323 awards appear for CA-52 place of performance in FY2024. That figure is a record count, including modifications, not a unique-recipient census. This packet does not divide $15.9 billion by 4,323 to invent an average. Use the California District 52 hub to inspect individual lines.

Congressional district is USAspending place-of-performance, not the recipient HQ. District 90/98 are USAspending unspecified/non-voting buckets.