Skip to main content
← All guides

California vs Illinois on USAspending: $39.5B vs $15.9B, inverted rows

California shows $39.5B in USAspending.gov obligations; Illinois shows $15.9B. Illinois still logs 1,544,633 awards against California’s 639,340. Spending per capita is close — $143.78 in Illinois and $135.64 in California — on 12,710,158 and 39,431,263 residents. Illinois’s top industry is all other miscellaneous manufacturing; California’s is commercial and institutional building construction. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B and $1.8B.

Key figures

  • California $39.5B vs Illinois $15.9B in USAspending obligations.
  • Per capita $135.64 vs $143.78 on 39,431,263 vs 12,710,158 residents.
  • Awards: 639,340 vs 1,544,633; FY2026 $5.3B vs $1.8B.
  • Top industries: commercial and institutional building construction (CA) vs all other miscellaneous manufacturing (IL).
  • Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Illinois’s 1.54 million awards on $15.9B

California logs 639,340 awards on $39.5B. Illinois logs 1,544,633 awards on $15.9B. Row volume and dollar stock are different rankings in this pair. A busier file is not automatically the heavier file, and a heavier file is not automatically the busier one. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award.

Readers who sort only by award count will miss $39.5B versus $15.9B. Readers who sort only by dollars will miss 639,340 versus 1,544,633. Hold both. Typical booking size moves with that split: fewer rows on more dollars means a heavier average action, not a moral grade. Illinois’s 1,544,633 awards are more than double California’s 639,340 on less than half the dollars.

Miscellaneous manufacturing vs building construction

Census counts are 39,431,263 in California and 12,710,158 in Illinois. Spending per capita is $135.64 versus $143.78. That ratio uses stacked obligations, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. A higher per-person reading means a thicker federal-award intensity on the Census denominator, nothing else.

All other miscellaneous manufacturing as Illinois’s peak is a catch-all manufacturing tag on a crowded row file. Commercial and institutional building construction as California’s peak sits on a heavier $39.5B stock with fewer rows. Population can lead while dollars trail, or the reverse. The table reports both. It does not convert either into outlays.

A $143.78 vs $135.64 per-capita near-tie

California’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Illinois’s top industry is all other miscellaneous manufacturing. Those labels are the tallest NAICS bars on $39.5B and $15.9B, not a full industrial census of 639,340 or 1,544,633 actions. Mix is a peak. Scale is the stacked stock.

Treat the industry tags as a starting map, then return to dollars, rows, and per capita. Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the California and Illinois state hubs for agencies and recipients.

FY2026: $5.3B vs $1.8B

FY2026 obligations are $5.3B in California and $1.8B in Illinois. Recency can agree with the stacked $39.5B versus $15.9B ranking or it can tighten or widen the gap. Do not divide those latest-year amounts by the all-years award counts of 639,340 and 1,544,633.

Per capita of $135.64 and $143.78 already divides stacked obligations by 39,431,263 and 12,710,158 residents. FY2026 is the recency cut of the same USAspending.gov series. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award.

How to read Illinois’s busy file against California

Four headline cuts travel together: stacked dollars ($39.5B vs $15.9B), award counts (639,340 vs 1,544,633), population (39,431,263 vs 12,710,158), and per capita ($135.64 vs $143.78). They do not always pick the same leader. That disagreement is the reason this pair exists as a comparison rather than a single ranking.

Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the California and Illinois state hubs for agencies and recipients. Keep every cut labeled as obligations. commercial and institutional building construction versus all other miscellaneous manufacturing remains mix, not an explanation of every dollar.

Near-tie intensity, lopsided stock and rows

California’s $39.5B versus Illinois’s $15.9B is the stock gap. Illinois’s 1,544,633 versus 639,340 is the row gap. Per capita of $135.64 versus $143.78 on 39,431,263 versus 12,710,158 residents is almost a tie. FY2026’s $5.3B versus $1.8B follows stock.

Construction versus miscellaneous manufacturing is mix. Both files are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays. The California and Illinois hubs hold agencies and recipients.

California versus Illinois on USAspending.gov is $39.5B versus $15.9B in stacked obligations, 639,340 versus 1,544,633 awards, 39,431,263 versus 12,710,158 residents, $135.64 versus $143.78 per capita, and $5.3B versus $1.8B in FY2026. Top industries remain commercial and institutional building construction and all other miscellaneous manufacturing. Those cuts are the packet.

Do not divide FY2026 dollars by all-years award counts. Do not treat $135.64 and $143.78 as household income. Do not treat commercial and institutional building construction or all other miscellaneous manufacturing as a complete industrial census. Place of performance can differ from headquarters. Cash outlays can lag. After the comparison table, the California and Illinois state hubs hold agencies and recipients.

Questions

Which has more federal spending, California or Illinois?
California shows $39.5B in USAspending.gov obligations; Illinois shows $15.9B. Award counts are 639,340 and 1,544,633. Populations are 39,431,263 and 12,710,158. Spending per capita is $135.64 versus $143.78. FY2026 obligations are $5.3B and $1.8B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
What industries lead California and Illinois federal awards?
California’s top industry is commercial and institutional building construction. Illinois’s top industry is all other miscellaneous manufacturing. Those slices sit on $39.5B and $15.9B in USAspending.gov obligations and on 639,340 versus 1,544,633 awards. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award.
How do California and Illinois compare on spending per capita?
Spending per capita is $135.64 in California on 39,431,263 residents and $143.78 in Illinois on 12,710,158 residents. Those ratios use stacked USAspending.gov obligations of $39.5B and $15.9B, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Are California vs Illinois figures Treasury outlays?
No. The $39.5B and $15.9B stacked totals, and FY2026 amounts of $5.3B and $1.8B, are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Award counts are 639,340 and 1,544,633. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.