Fertilizer Product Expansion Program — CFDA 10.383

Fertilizer-expansion obligations at $659.4M

USAspending.gov records $659,374,260.71 in obligations under CFDA 10.383. Eighty-eight awards produce that stock. A simple average is about $7.49 million per award. That average is a quotient of two packet totals, not a typical plant-expansion invoice and not a cost per ton of nutrient.

The assistance-listing title is FERTILIZER PRODUCT EXPANSION PROGRAM. CFDA 10.383 is the identifier. Other USDA rural-development or farm-input listings tagged under different CFDA numbers are not mixed into the $659.4M. Combining those codes would invent a combined fertilizer total this packet does not contain.

85 recipients on 88 award rows

Eighty-five recipients share 88 awards, or about 1.04 award records per recipient on average. Splitting $659,374,260.71 evenly would assign about $7.76 million per recipient. That density is a facility-grant fingerprint: almost one assistance row per named organization. The packet does not list the 85. Recipient count is the organizational headcount on the federal extract, not a census of fertilizer plants or farmers. Eighty-five named payees on 88 rows is the 10.383 fingerprint.

Thirty-six states in the geographic count is a broad but incomplete map. Expansion dollars follow project geography as coded, not equal shares. Place-of-performance amounts are on the program table.

Award rows are not a tonnage census

Among USDA industrial listings, 10.383 is a low-row, high-average file: 88 awards against 85 recipients. Award count is a weak proxy for “number of plants” and a worse proxy for nutrient tons. Recipients (85) tell you how many named organizations sit on the extract; awards (88) tell you how many assistance rows were stored.

The packet does not report capacity, feedstock, or acres. Citing 88 as fertilizer plants would be a unit error. Keep the units straight: dollars, awards, recipients, states. Eighty-eight awards at about $7.49 million each is industrial-facility architecture, not a farm-payment row count.

Obligations versus expansion outlays

The $659.4M is an obligation total from USAspending.gov. Outlays — cash paid against Fertilizer Product Expansion awards — are not in the packet. A facility file can show a large obligation stock while construction draws follow a later calendar. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total. A remaining-balance question is an outlay question this extract does not answer.

Use CFDA 10.383 to size this Fertilizer Product Expansion Program listing in the assistance file. Do not use it as a crop-insurance or EQIP dashboard. Those series live elsewhere. This page reports the obligation book tagged 10.383.

What the 10.383 tables omit

The program hub lists award-backed obligations from USAspending.gov. It is not a plant directory, not a nutrient-balance sheet, and not a farm-input price index. Series that never appear as assistance awards will not show up in the $659,374,260.71. That omission is definitional rather than a gap in the 88 award rows.

Place-of-performance on 36 states is a coding field. Read the program page before treating those cells as equal shares. Recipient dollars, if shown on the hub, are still obligation amounts, not cash already paid to grantees.

Fertilizer Product Expansion’s 36-state map and 85-recipient headcount together describe a facility-grant book, not a producer-scale farm-payment file. A researcher comparing 10.383 with EQIP or crop-insurance codes should keep CFDA numbers separate. The $659.4M stock is the USAspending obligation book for this listing only.

Where the 10.383 table lives

The program page overlays these four facts. The all-programs index ranks 10.383 among other assistance listings. Agency pages show awarding-agency rollups that may include this CFDA among other USDA listings. For 10.383 only, start on the program page.

CFDA 10.383’s 88 awards spread $659,374,260.71 across 85 recipients and 36 states. Quote award count as a record count, recipient count as the organizational headcount, and dollars as obligations from USAspending.gov. About 1.04 award records per recipient is the density story on this listing. Outlays remain a separate column. Source: USAspending.gov assistance awards.

Tonnage, plant capacity, and feedstock live in other USDA series. Those rows are outside $659,374,260.71 unless they share CFDA 10.383. Quote 88 as assistance records, 85 as organizational payees, and 36 as the geographic count.

Questions

How much is obligated for fertilizer product expansion?

USAspending.gov records $659.4M in obligations for CFDA 10.383. SpendingVault indexes 88 awards, 85 recipients, and 36 states. The figure is an obligation sum from assistance awards, not an outlay and not a tonnage count. CFDA 10.383’s $659,374,260.71 is the USAspending obligation stock.

How many awards does CFDA 10.383 carry?

The listing shows 88 awards against 85 recipients, or about 1.04 award records per recipient. A simple average is about $7.49 million per award. Award count is not a count of plants or nutrient tons. Recipient dollars are on the program page.

How many organizations receive 10.383 awards?

The extract lists 85 recipients. Those are organizational recipients on assistance awards tagged 10.383, not a census of fertilizer plants or farmers. Geographic coding covers 36 states. The packet does not name the 85 or publish capacity figures. Keep dollars, awards, recipients, and geography as separate units on the USAspending extract.

Is $659.4M already paid for fertilizer expansion?

Not necessarily. Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. CFDA 10.383’s indexed total is the obligation stock from USAspending.gov. This page does not report cash drawn, remaining balances, or tons produced. The $659,374,260.71 on 88 awards is the obligation figure. Keep dollars, awards, recipients, and geography as separate units on the USAspending extract.