Smith-Lever Extension Funding — CFDA 10.511

Smith-Lever extension obligations at $2.12 billion

USAspending.gov records $2,118,457,994.02 in obligations under CFDA 10.511. Five hundred one awards produce that stock. A simple average is about $4.23 million per award — consistent with multi-year formula allocations to land-grant extension systems rather than county-level project grants. That average is a quotient of two packet totals, not a typical workshop budget or a per-agent cost.

The assistance-listing title is SMITH-LEVER EXTENSION FUNDING. CFDA 10.511 is the identifier. Other NIFA extension or research listings tagged under different CFDA numbers are not mixed into the $2.12 billion. Combining those codes would invent a combined extension total this packet does not contain.

58 recipients across 57 jurisdictions

Fifty-eight recipients share 501 awards, or about 8.6 award records per recipient on average. Splitting $2.12 billion evenly would assign about $36.5 million per recipient. That density is a land-grant portfolio: several award years per extension system. The packet does not list the 58. Recipient count is the organizational headcount on the federal award, not a census of county offices or agents.

Fifty-seven jurisdictions in the geographic count nearly match the recipient headcount. That alignment is the signature of a nationwide formula. Place-of-performance amounts are on the program table and will still vary by allocation.

Award count is not an agent or workshop count

Among agriculture listings, 10.511 is a moderate-row file relative to 58 recipients: 501 awards. Multi-year awards and amendments can inflate award count relative to unique systems. Award count is therefore a weak proxy for “number of extension programs.” Recipients (58) tell you how many named organizations sit on the extract; awards (501) tell you how many assistance rows were stored.

The packet does not report agent FTE, farm visits, or workshop attendance. Citing 501 as counties or agents would be a unit error. Keep the units straight: dollars, awards, recipients, jurisdictions.

Obligations versus extension outlays

The $2.12 billion is an obligation total from USAspending.gov. Outlays — cash paid against Smith-Lever awards — are not in the packet. A land-grant university can show a large obligation stock while county programming follows a slower calendar. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total. A remaining-balance question is an outlay question this extract does not answer.

Use CFDA 10.511 to size this Smith-Lever Extension Funding listing in the assistance file. Do not use it as a county-agent dashboard. Those series live elsewhere. This page reports the obligation book tagged 10.511.

What the 10.511 tables omit

The Smith-Lever hub lists award-backed obligations from USAspending.gov. It is not a county-office directory, not an agent roster, and not an outcomes report. Series that never appear as assistance awards will not show up in the $2,118,457,994.02. That omission is definitional rather than a gap in the 501 award rows.

Place-of-performance on 57 jurisdictions is a coding field. Read the program page before treating those cells as equal shares. Recipient dollars, if shown on the hub, are still obligation amounts, not cash already spent on programming.

Where the 10.511 table lives

The program page overlays these four facts. The all-programs index ranks 10.511 among other assistance listings. Agency pages show awarding-agency rollups that may include this CFDA among other USDA listings. For 10.511 only, start on the program page.

CFDA 10.511’s 501 awards spread $2,118,457,994.02 across 58 recipients and 57 jurisdictions. Quote award count as a record count, recipient count as the organizational headcount, and dollars as obligations from USAspending.gov. About 8.6 award records per recipient is the density story on this listing. Outlays remain a separate column. Source: USAspending.gov assistance awards. Read 10.511 as a land-grant formula book: 58 organizations, 501 awards, 57 jurisdictions, and about 8.6 rows per recipient. The $2.12 billion remains an obligation stock on USAspending.gov, not an agent or workshop census.

Questions

How much is obligated for Smith-Lever Extension Funding?

USAspending.gov records $2,118,457,994.02 in obligations for CFDA 10.511. SpendingVault indexes 501 awards, 58 recipients, and 57 jurisdictions. The figure is an obligation sum from assistance awards, not an outlay and not an agent count. CFDA 10.511’s $2.12 billion is the USAspending obligation stock.

How many awards does CFDA 10.511 carry?

The listing shows 501 awards against 58 recipients, or about 8.6 award records per recipient. A simple average is about $4.23 million per award. Award count is not an agent or workshop count. Recipient dollars are on the program page.

How many organizations receive 10.511 awards?

The extract lists 58 recipients. Those are organizational recipients on assistance awards tagged 10.511, typically land-grant extension systems rather than county offices. Geographic coding covers 57 jurisdictions. The packet does not name the 58.

Is $2.12 billion already spent on extension programming?

Not necessarily. Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. CFDA 10.511’s indexed total is the obligation stock from USAspending.gov. This page does not report cash drawn, remaining balances, or farm visits. The $2.12 billion on 501 awards is the obligation figure.