Stewardship Agreements — CFDA 10.701 USAspending obligations

$574.8M committed on the 10.701 catalog line

The $574.8M headline is an obligation sum from USAspending.gov assistance awards. An obligation marks a federal commitment. It does not, by itself, prove that timber, restoration work, or other agreement outputs have been delivered, and it does not prove that the Treasury has paid the same amount. SpendingVault indexes the CFDA 10.701 rollup so readers can place stewardship-agreement dollars next to other assistance listings without mixing metrics.

No fiscal year is attached to the $574.8M in this packet. The total is whatever the indexed extract currently sums for STEWARDSHIP AGREEMENTS. If another document cites a single-year appropriation or a forest-unit target, it is answering a different question. This guide stays with the four facts in the file: dollars, awards, recipients, and states.

Stewardship agreements, as named on the listing, can mix goods, services, and land-management tasks in ways a standard grant row does not explain. This extract still stores them as assistance awards with an obligation total. The $574.8M should not be read as a procurement contract ceiling or as a timber-sale receipt. If a reader has a forest-unit spreadsheet, match the identifier and the metric before adding that spreadsheet to this CFDA sum. SpendingVault’s 237-award table is the place to reconcile individual lines, not this four-number rollup.

237 awards sitting on 102 recipient identifiers

The extract lists 237 awards and 102 recipients. That is more than two awards per recipient if the ratio were even, but the packet does not publish that average as an official statistic, and concentration can be uneven. Award count is a count of assistance-award records, which can include modifications and continuations. Recipient count is distinct identifiers, not a headcount of crews or partner forests.

Because 102 recipients is a relatively compact set for $574.8M, the table is small enough to scan for repeat names. Repeat appearance does not, on its own, imply a problem or a preference; it only means the same identifier received more than one recorded award. Organization type, land-unit name, and agreement duration are not in the packet, so they are not guessed here.

32 states, not a nationwide formula map

CFDA 10.701 shows 32 states in the extract. That is narrower than many formula grant listings and wider than a single-region earmark. The packet does not identify which 32 states appear or how the $574.8M is split among them. Stewardship-agreement geography in USAspending follows the award’s recorded place of performance or recipient location as the source coded it — this file does not say which field drove the count.

Thirty-two states is a coverage statistic. It is not proof that agreement activity is evenly spread, and it is not a list of national forests. Readers who need unit-level maps should use the award table rather than this rollup. SpendingVault will not invent a per-state dollar figure that the packet omitted.

A 32-state footprint also means the listing is not a hidden single-state earmark in this extract. It still may cluster. Without a dollar split, clustering is a hypothesis for the table, not a finding for this page. Sort the 237 awards by amount, then by location fields USAspending stored, to see whether a handful of states dominate the $574.8M. This guide will not rank those states in advance of a fact the packet omitted.

What the stewardship listing does not measure

The title STEWARDSHIP AGREEMENTS describes the assistance listing. It does not, in this extract, quantify acres treated, board-feet, or matching partner contributions. Those outputs would be a different dataset. The $574.8M remains an obligation total on 237 awards. Mixing it with accomplishment reports would double-count activity that this file never measured.

Outlays, if they exist on the same awards, are a separate USAspending field. This page does not substitute them. If a reader needs paid amounts, the award-level USAspending record — not this CFDA rollup — is the place to look, and even there the metric must be checked. SpendingVault’s program hub keeps the obligation definition consistent across catalog lines.

Open the 10.701 rows, then the catalog

The CFDA 10.701 program page lists the 237 award lines behind $574.8M. The all-programs index is the comparison shelf for other assistance listings. Agency pages are a different cut of USAspending and are not a substitute for this CFDA total; the packet does not name the awarding agency, so this guide does not attach $574.8M to a department header on its own.

How 10.701 sits beside other assistance lines

On the all-programs index, STEWARDSHIP AGREEMENTS land near other CFDA rows with obligation totals in the same band. That proximity is a catalog accident of dollar size, not a claim that the programs do the same work. Agency pages, listed separately, roll up awarding-department totals; this packet does not name the department for CFDA 10.701, so $574.8M is not copied onto an agency card here. Keep the program hub and the agency hub as two different cuts of USAspending.

Questions

What is the USAspending total for Stewardship Agreements?

CFDA 10.701 shows $574.8M in obligations on USAspending.gov assistance awards indexed by SpendingVault. The amount is a commitment total, not an outlay total and not a measure of work completed under the agreements. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 10.701 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

How many stewardship-agreement awards are in the extract?

The file lists 237 awards and 102 recipients. Award rows can include modifications. Recipient count is distinct identifiers, not a count of field crews. The packet does not publish an official awards-per-recipient average. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 10.701 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Which states have Stewardship Agreements on this listing?

The extract counts 32 states. It does not name them or split the $574.8M by state. USAspending state counts follow however the source coded place of performance or recipient location; this packet does not say which field was used.

Do stewardship obligations equal payments to partners?

No. Obligations are recorded commitments. Treasury outlays are payments. The $574.8M on CFDA 10.701 is the obligation sum in SpendingVault’s extract. Payment timing and in-kind exchange values are not in this packet. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 10.701 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.