Emergency livestock relief 2023–2024 flood and wildfire — CFDA 10.987

$560.3M on a 30,587-row livestock relief file

USAspending.gov attaches $560.3M in obligations to assistance awards tagged 10.987. SpendingVault reprints that commitment sum. The listing title names 2023 and 2024 flood and wildfire relief; the extract still does not split the $560.3M between those years or between flood and wildfire. This guide will not invent that split. The dollars are not an indemnity run from a crop-insurance ledger and not an outlay dashboard.

Thirty thousand five hundred eighty-seven awards is a high-volume assistance file. Row counts that large often include many producer-level awards rather than a handful of cooperative agreements, but the packet has no size distribution. Do not divide $560.3M by 30,587 and publish the quotient as a typical relief check. Amount-sort on the program hub is the check for a tail of large awards inside the total.

Awards without a recipient total in the packet

The extract records 30,587 awards and does not supply a recipient count. Missing recipientCount is not a claim that the awards have no payees. It means this rollup omitted a distinct-identifier census. Do not treat 30,587 as a count of ranchers. One producer can hold more than one award, and modifications can add rows.

If the program hub shows names on individual lines, those names are still not a packet-level recipient fact. This page will not impute how many unique entities sit behind 30,587 rows. The only volume statistics in the file remain the award count, the 45-state count, and the $560.3M obligation sum.

45 states on the livestock-relief extract

The file counts 45 states. That is wide coverage without claiming every jurisdiction in a 50-plus extract. The packet does not name the 45 or split the $560.3M among them. Flood and wildfire geography is uneven by nature; this rollup still cannot rank states. A state with many of the 30,587 awards could hold a small share of dollars if those awards are small.

USAspending state counts follow recorded location fields. A producer’s mailing state may differ from where animals were lost. This packet does not say which field fed the count of 45. Use award-level geography on the hub for a particular county or state. The 45-state figure is a coverage count, not a disaster-declaration list.

Livestock-relief obligations are not inventory losses

Death-loss affidavits, feed-cost indexes, and pasture-condition maps are different datasets. The $560.3M on CFDA 10.987 is federal assistance-award obligations. Treating that sum as the value of animals lost would mix ledgers. SpendingVault keeps the USAspending commitment definition so this listing can sit beside other CFDA rows on the same metric.

Outlays are payments. Obligations are commitments. Disaster awards can record a commitment before a producer receives funds. This extract does not report outlays, eligibility rules, or per-head rates. Cite $560.3M as recorded commitments on 30,587 awards. Do not describe it as money already in ranch operating accounts.

Keeping 10.987 on its own catalog row

Other farm disaster listings can appear near this one on the all-programs index because their obligation totals occupy a similar dollar band. Similar scale is not similar purpose. Do not add CFDA 10.987’s $560.3M to an emergency conservation or crop-disaster line to build a homemade “all livestock disaster” total. Match the assistance-listing number on any county-office printout before comparing dollars.

Where the 30,587 award rows live

The Emergency Livestock Relief program page holds the 30,587-award table behind $560.3M. Filter by location if a state is the question; the 45-state count will not name them. Agency pages are a different USAspending cut; this packet does not name the awarding agency, so the $560.3M stays on the CFDA card. After checking a line, return to the all-programs index to see neighboring assistance listings without combining their totals. County-office printouts that omit the 10.987 number are not this extract.

Questions

How much is obligated under CFDA 10.987?

EMERGENCY LIVESTOCK RELIEF PROGRAM 2023 AND 2024 FLOOD AND WILDFIRE shows $560.3M in USAspending.gov obligations in SpendingVault’s extract. The figure is a commitment total, not outlays and not a count of livestock lost. The packet does not split dollars by year or by flood versus wildfire.

How many livestock relief awards are in the extract?

The file lists 30,587 awards. A distinct recipient count is not supplied, so 30,587 is not a headcount of producers. Award rows can include modifications, and one recipient can hold more than one award. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 10.987 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Which states appear on the 10.987 listing?

The extract counts 45 states but does not name them or split the $560.3M by state. Location follows USAspending’s recorded fields, which this packet does not specify. Use the award table for geography on individual lines. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 10.987 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Is $560.3M the amount paid to ranchers?

No. Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. The $560.3M on CFDA 10.987 is the obligation total in this extract. Per-head rates and payment dates are not in the packet. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 10.987 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.