Regional Technology and Innovation Hubs — CFDA 11.039 totals

Ninety-eight awards carrying $529.8M

USAspending.gov attaches $529.8M in obligations to assistance awards tagged 11.039. SpendingVault reprints that catalog total. The listing title names regional technology and innovation hubs. Hub, as a word in the title, does not come with a map of designated regions in this extract. The $529.8M is commitments on 98 awards, not a jobs model.

No fiscal year is supplied. If a consortium press note cites a different tech-hub total, match the CFDA number before adding that note to $529.8M. Other regional-innovation or manufacturing listings are other catalog rows. Keep 11.039’s obligation sum on its own line. Ninety-eight awards at this dollar scale is a compact-to-mid file: larger than a handful of cooperative agreements, smaller than a formula program.

The packet has no median award size. Do not divide $529.8M by 98 and publish the quotient as a typical hub grant. Amount-sort on the hub table is the check. Technology sector — semiconductors, biotech, or other — is not in the packet. Award titles on the table are the place to see what USAspending stored.

98 awards on 75 consortium identifiers

Seventy-five recipients hold 98 awards. That pattern is compatible with lead institutions receiving more than one award or phase. The packet does not classify the 75 as universities, economic-development groups, or companies. Award count is a row count; recipient count is distinct identifiers, not a count of consortium members beneath a lead.

A 75-name list is short enough to scan on the program hub. Repeat identifiers mean the same organization received more than one recorded award. Repeat appearance is not a finding about cluster performance. Partner lists, matching private capital, and facility square footage are not in this extract.

33 states on the tech-hub extract

The file counts 33 states. That is moderate coverage for a regional-hub listing. The packet does not name the 33 or split the $529.8M among them. A hub can span more than one state; USAspending still assigns a state count from recorded location fields. This packet does not say which field fed the count.

Thirty-three states is a coverage statistic, not a competitiveness ranking. Missing states are not listed, so their absence is not explained here. Use award-level place fields on the hub if a particular region is the question. This rollup will not impute designated-hub maps.

Hub obligations are not employment outlays

Job-creation claims, private matching pledges, and state incentive packages are different ledgers. CFDA 11.039’s $529.8M is USAspending assistance-award obligations. Mixing those sources into $529.8M would build a homemade “all tech-hub capital” figure the packet does not support.

Outlays are payments. Obligations are commitments. Consortium awards can draw after the obligation date. This extract does not report outlays or jobs. Cite $529.8M as recorded commitments on 98 awards. Do not describe the sum as money already in a regional development account.

Not a combined industrial-strategy catalog

Other technology and manufacturing listings can sit near 11.039 on the all-programs index because their obligation totals occupy a similar band. Similar scale is not similar designation. Do not add this $529.8M to a neighboring CFDA. Keep Regional Technology and Innovation Hubs on their own catalog row.

Opening the 11.039 table

The Regional Technology and Innovation Hubs program page lists the 98 awards and 75 recipients behind $529.8M. Filter by location if a state is the question; the 33-state count will not name them. Agency pages are a different USAspending cut; this packet does not name the awarding agency, so the $529.8M stays on the CFDA card. Cluster-strategy slide decks remain a different file than this obligation rollup. Cite $529.8M only as the CFDA 11.039 obligation total on SpendingVault. Cluster-strategy slide decks are not this CFDA 11.039 extract. Cite $529.8M only as the obligation total on SpendingVault. Job-creation models are outside the packet.

Questions

How much is obligated under Regional Technology and Innovation Hubs?

CFDA 11.039 shows $529.8M in USAspending.gov obligations in SpendingVault’s extract. The figure is a commitment total, not outlays and not a count of jobs created or hubs designated on a map. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 11.039 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

How many tech-hub awards are in the extract?

The file lists 98 awards and 75 recipients. Award count is a row count; recipient count is distinct identifiers. The packet does not list consortium members under a lead institution. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 11.039 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Which states appear on CFDA 11.039?

The extract counts 33 states but does not name them or split the $529.8M by state. A hub can span borders; USAspending state counts follow recorded location fields that this packet does not specify. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 11.039 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Is $529.8M the amount already spent in those regions?

No. Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. The $529.8M on CFDA 11.039 is the obligation total. Private match and job counts are not in this packet. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 11.039 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.