Green and Resilient Retrofit Program — CFDA 14.021 totals

How to read $555.5M on CFDA 14.021

USAspending.gov records $555.5M in obligations on assistance awards tagged 14.021. SpendingVault reprints that catalog total. An obligation is a federal commitment on the award. It is not a utility rebate, not a tax-credit allocation, and not a construction-draw register. The listing title names green and resilient retrofit work; the extract does not split the $555.5M between energy measures and resilience measures. This guide will not invent that split.

No fiscal year is attached to the total. Multi-year retrofit jobs can still appear here as a single obligation sum. If a property owner’s closing binder shows a different federal line, match the assistance-listing number before adding that binder to $555.5M. SpendingVault’s figure is CFDA 14.021 only. Other housing-rehab listings are other catalog rows.

Five hundred thirty awards at this dollar scale is a mid-volume assistance file. The packet has no median award size. Do not divide $555.5M by 530 and publish the quotient as a typical retrofit grant. Amount-sort on the program hub is the check for a tail of large properties inside the total. Building type — high-rise, scattered site, or other — is not in the packet.

530 awards sitting near 453 recipients

Four hundred fifty-three recipients hold 530 awards. The two counts are close, which is compatible with many one-award recipients plus some repeats, but the packet does not publish that split. Award rows can include amendments. Recipient count is distinct identifiers, not a count of buildings or apartments. Owner type is not labeled here.

A 453-recipient list is large enough that scanning every name is slow; use the hub’s search and amount sort. Repeat identifiers mean the same organization received more than one recorded award. Repeat appearance is not a finding about retrofit quality. Scope of work on each property is not in this four-field extract.

42 states on the retrofit extract

The file counts 42 states. That is wide coverage without claiming every jurisdiction in a 50-plus extract. The packet does not name the 42 or split the $555.5M among them. Housing retrofit geography follows recorded location fields, which may be the owner’s state rather than every building’s city. This packet does not say which field fed the count.

Forty-two states is a coverage statistic, not a climate-risk ranking and not a utility-territory map. A state with many of the 530 awards could still hold a small share of dollars if those awards are small. Without a dollar split, this guide will not rank jurisdictions. Use award-level place fields on the hub for a particular state.

Retrofit obligations are not kilowatt-hour results

Green-building scorecards and resilience audits are different datasets. The $555.5M on CFDA 14.021 is USAspending obligations. Mixing that sum with avoided-emissions estimates would claim results this file does not contain. Match the metric before comparing this CFDA line to a property-level case study.

Outlays are payments. Obligations are commitments. Construction draws on retrofit work can lag the obligation date. This extract does not report outlays, completed units, or energy savings. Cite $555.5M as recorded commitments on 530 awards. Do not describe the sum as money already in contractor accounts.

Keeping 14.021 off homemade housing totals

Other housing-rehab and energy-efficiency listings can sit near this one on the all-programs index because their obligation totals occupy a similar band. Similar scale is not similar purpose. Do not add CFDA 14.021’s $555.5M to a neighboring catalog row to build a homemade “all retrofit” figure. Keep the Green and Resilient Retrofit Program on its own assistance-listing number.

Opening the 14.021 award table

The Green and Resilient Retrofit Program page lists the 530 awards and 453 recipients behind $555.5M. Filter by location if a state is the question; the 42-state count will not name them. Agency pages are a different USAspending cut; this packet does not name the awarding agency, so the $555.5M stays on the CFDA card. The all-programs index is for scale comparison, not for merging housing-catalog totals. Property-level energy models remain a different file than this obligation rollup.

Questions

How much is obligated under the Green and Resilient Retrofit Program?

CFDA 14.021 shows $555.5M in USAspending.gov obligations in SpendingVault’s extract. The figure is a sum of assistance-award commitments, not Treasury outlays and not a count of housing units retrofitted or kilowatt-hours saved. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 14.021 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

How many retrofit awards and recipients are in the extract?

The file lists 530 awards and 453 recipients. Award count is a row count; recipient count is distinct identifiers. The packet does not classify owners or count buildings. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 14.021 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Which states received CFDA 14.021 awards?

The extract counts 42 states but does not name them or split the $555.5M by state. Location follows USAspending’s recorded fields, which this packet does not specify. Use the award table for geography on individual lines. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 14.021 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.

Is $555.5M the amount already spent on retrofits?

No. Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. The $555.5M on CFDA 14.021 is the obligation total. Construction draws and energy-savings results are not in this packet. USAspending.gov obligations on CFDA 14.021 are recorded commitments, not Treasury outlays.