Supportive Housing for the Elderly — CFDA 14.157
$2.44 billion in federal obligations is indexed on USAspending.gov for Supportive Housing for the Elderly (CFDA 14.157). The listing carries 8,135 awards, 2,682 recipients, and a 53-jurisdiction geographic count. Those dollars are assistance obligations, not outlays and not a count of apartments, elderly residents, or Section 202 properties. Eight thousand-plus award rows against 2,682 organizations is a project-level housing file: many small-to-mid awards, not a handful of state pass-throughs.
Key figures
- CFDA 14.157 shows $2.44 billion in USAspending obligations for Supportive Housing for the Elderly.
- The listing covers 8,135 awards and 2,682 recipients.
- Awards are coded to 53 jurisdictions in the USAspending geographic count.
- Totals are obligations, not outlays or apartment counts.
Elderly supportive-housing obligations at $2.44 billion
USAspending.gov records $2,443,865,162.76 in obligations under CFDA 14.157. Eight thousand one hundred thirty-five awards produce that stock. A simple average is about $300,000 per award — far smaller than a typical state formula grant and consistent with project-level housing assistance and renewals. That average is a quotient of two packet totals, not a typical unit subsidy or a per-resident cost.
The assistance-listing title is SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY. CFDA 14.157 is the identifier. Other HUD housing listings tagged under different CFDA numbers are not mixed into the $2.44 billion. Combining those codes would invent a combined elderly-housing total this packet does not contain.
2,682 recipients across 53 jurisdictions
Two thousand six hundred eighty-two recipients share 8,135 awards, or about 3.0 award records per recipient on average. Splitting $2.44 billion evenly would assign about $911,000 per recipient. That pattern is a large roster of project sponsors with a few rows each, not a 50-state formula. The packet does not list the 2,682. Recipient count is the organizational headcount, not a census of elderly residents or apartments.
Fifty-three jurisdictions in the geographic count cover states plus additional coded entities in the USAspending state field. Housing dollars still concentrate where Section 202 projects sit. Place-of-performance amounts are on the program table.
Award count is not a unit or resident count
Among HUD listings, 14.157 is a high-volume file: 8,135 rows against 2,682 recipients. Renewals, amendments, and project-level rows can inflate award count relative to unique properties. Award count is therefore a weak proxy for “number of elderly housing units.” Recipients (2,682) tell you how many named organizations sit on the extract; awards (8,135) tell you how many assistance rows were stored.
The packet does not report apartments, waitlists, or resident ages. Citing 8,135 as units or seniors would be a unit error. Keep the units straight: dollars, awards, recipients, jurisdictions.
Obligations versus housing outlays
The $2.44 billion is an obligation total from USAspending.gov. Outlays — cash paid against elderly supportive-housing awards — are not in the packet. A project can show a large obligation stock while construction or rental assistance follows a slower calendar. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total. A remaining-balance question is an outlay question this extract does not answer.
Use CFDA 14.157 to size this Supportive Housing for the Elderly listing in the assistance file. Do not use it as a unit-inventory dashboard. Those series live elsewhere. This page reports the obligation book tagged 14.157.
What the 14.157 tables omit
The elderly supportive-housing hub lists award-backed obligations from USAspending.gov. It is not a property registry, not a resident roster, and not a waitlist. Series that never appear as assistance awards will not show up in the $2,443,865,162.76. That omission is definitional rather than a gap in the 8,135 award rows.
Place-of-performance on 53 jurisdictions is a coding field. Read the program page before treating those cells as equal shares. Recipient dollars, if shown on the hub, are still obligation amounts, not cash already spent on construction or services.
Where the 14.157 table lives
The program page overlays these four facts. The all-programs index ranks 14.157 among other assistance listings. Agency pages show awarding-agency rollups that may include this CFDA among other HUD listings. For 14.157 only, start on the program page.
CFDA 14.157’s 8,135 awards spread $2,443,865,162.76 across 2,682 recipients and 53 jurisdictions. Quote award count as a record count, recipient count as the organizational headcount, and dollars as obligations from USAspending.gov. About 3.0 award records per recipient is the density story on this listing. Outlays remain a separate column. Source: USAspending.gov assistance awards. Read 14.157 as a project-level housing book: 8,135 rows, 2,682 sponsors, and about $300,000 averages that describe renewals and project awards rather than state pass-throughs. The $2.44 billion remains an obligation stock on USAspending.gov.
Questions
- How much is obligated for supportive housing for the elderly?
- USAspending.gov records $2,443,865,162.76 in obligations for CFDA 14.157. SpendingVault indexes 8,135 awards, 2,682 recipients, and 53 jurisdictions. The figure is an obligation sum from assistance awards, not an outlay and not a unit count. CFDA 14.157’s $2.44 billion is the USAspending obligation stock.
- How many awards does CFDA 14.157 carry?
- The listing shows 8,135 awards against 2,682 recipients, or about 3.0 award records per recipient. A simple average is about $300,000 per award. Award count is not an apartment or resident count. Recipient dollars are on the program page.
- How many organizations receive 14.157 awards?
- The extract lists 2,682 recipients. Those are organizational recipients on assistance awards tagged 14.157. Geographic coding covers 53 jurisdictions. The packet does not name the 2,682 or publish unit counts. Recipient count is the organizational headcount.
- Is $2.44 billion already spent on elderly housing?
- Not necessarily. Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. CFDA 14.157’s indexed total is the obligation stock from USAspending.gov. This page does not report cash drawn, remaining balances, or apartments. The $2.44 billion on 8,135 awards is the obligation figure.
CFDA/Assistance Listing numbers from USAspending assistance awards on SpendingVault.