National Clean Investment Fund — CFDA 66.957 obligations

Three awards hold $13.97 billion

Assistance listing 66.957 is titled GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND: NATIONAL CLEAN INVESTMENT FUND in the USAspending.gov files this site indexes. The obligation total on that code is $13,970,000,000. An obligation is a recorded federal commitment. It is not money already spent on equipment or loans.

Only 3 awards sit under that dollar book. Dividing $13,970,000,000 by 3 produces a mean of about $4.66 billion per award record. That quotient is derived from the two packet totals. It is not a typical municipal grant and not a per-household energy rebate. A listing this concentrated will look sparse in the award table even while the dollar sum is large.

The recipient count matches the award count: 3 recipients. Two states appear in place-of-performance coding. The extract therefore describes a handful of large assistance actions, not a wide competitive round of small awards.

Why 3 recipients and 2 states matter

CFDA 66.957 lists 3 recipients and 2 states against 3 awards. Recipient count here is not unique borrowers in a lending portfolio. It is how many organizational recipients the assistance extract stores. With 3 awards and 3 recipients, each stored recipient lines up with a single award row in this snapshot—an unusual 1:1 ratio among large listings.

Two states is a coded-jurisdiction count, not a statement that activity cannot occur elsewhere through those recipients. A national fund coded to two place-of-performance cells can still transact widely. The hub keeps $13,970,000,000, 3 awards, 3 recipients, and 2 states visible so geography is not inferred from dollars.

Obligations versus clean-energy outlays

USAspending.gov publishes obligations on assistance awards. The $13,970,000,000 figure for CFDA 66.957 can include commitments that will disburse over many years. A separate greenhouse-gas inventory, a Treasury outlay table, or a project completion report is a different series. This page does not convert 3 awards into tons of emissions avoided.

If a number you expected is missing, the usual cause is a different reporting concept. Start from the obligation definition, then open the 66.957 program page. Do not treat 3 awards as a complete catalog of every clean-investment dollar in federal files.

What the 66.957 tables omit

The National Clean Investment Fund hub lists award-backed obligations from USAspending.gov. It is not a loan-level tape, not a construction schedule, and not an emissions scorecard. Series that never appear as assistance awards will not show up in the $13,970,000,000. That omission is definitional rather than a gap in the 3 award rows.

Place-of-performance on 2 states is a coding field. Read the program page before treating those two cells as the only places dollars can flow.

How to cite CFDA 66.957

A complete citation is $13,970,000,000 in obligations for CFDA 66.957, covering 3 awards, 3 recipients, and 2 states, drawn from USAspending.gov assistance awards on SpendingVault. Name the series as obligations. Lead with the 3-award count if the question is concentration.

Start with the National Clean Investment Fund program page, then the all-programs index. Agency pages show awarding organizations; they do not replace this listing’s obligation total.

A worked reading of the 66.957 extract

Start from the four packet facts on CFDA 66.957: $13,970,000,000 in obligations, 3 awards, 3 recipients, and 2 states. The mean near $4.66 billion per award is a quotient from those two packet totals, not a typical unit cost and not a household or client rate. If a later USAspending.gov file adds a few large actions, dollars can jump while 3 recipients barely move. If modifications proliferate, 3 can rise while the dollar book stays close to $13,970,000,000.

Nothing in the extract splits GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND: NATIONAL CLEAN INVESTMENT FUND into subaccounts, fiscal years, or outlay versus obligation series beyond the stored totals. Those cuts live in other publications. Treat CFDA 66.957 as an assistance-listing tag on USAspending.gov award files. Open the program page, then the all-programs index, for a same-series ranking. Cite 3 awards and 3 recipients next to the dollars so the record count is visible beside $13,970,000,000. Name the series as obligations, not outlays, every time the figure is reused. Agency pages show awarding organizations; they do not replace this listing’s obligation total.

A complete working citation for this listing is $13,970,000,000 in USAspending.gov obligations for CFDA 66.957, covering 3 awards, 3 recipients, and 2 states, indexed on SpendingVault. Do not convert 3 awards into a project catalog, or 2 states into a limit on where the fund can transact. The 2-state field is place-of-performance coding in the assistance extract. Read the GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND: NATIONAL CLEAN INVESTMENT FUND hub before inferring a geographic story from the dollar total alone. If a number you expected is missing from $13,970,000,000, the usual cause is a different reporting concept rather than a gap in the 3 award rows.

Questions

How much is obligated under the National Clean Investment Fund?

USAspending.gov assistance awards indexed on SpendingVault show $13,970,000,000 in obligations for CFDA 66.957. That sum is an obligation total, not a Treasury outlay total. The same extract lists 3 awards, 3 recipients, and 2 states. The program hub on SpendingVault holds the award rows behind those totals. Keep the series labeled as obligations from USAspending.gov assistance awards; do not swap in an outlay figure from another report.

Why does CFDA 66.957 have only 3 awards?

The indexed award count is 3. Those three records carry the full $13,970,000,000 obligation book. The 3 figure is a file statistic, not a count of subprojects or borrowers. Three organizational recipients are stored on those rows. The program hub on SpendingVault holds the award rows behind those totals. Keep the series labeled as obligations from USAspending.gov assistance awards; do not swap in an outlay figure from another report.

Does $13.97 billion mean money already spent?

Not as a cash-paid sum. USAspending reports obligations—commitments to pay—rather than outlays. The $13,970,000,000 figure can include amounts that will disburse later. Cite CFDA 66.957 with the obligation total from USAspending.gov assistance awards, not an outlay series. The program hub on SpendingVault holds the award rows behind those totals. Keep the series labeled as obligations from USAspending.gov assistance awards; do not swap in an outlay figure from another report.

How many states appear on CFDA 66.957?

The extract codes 2 states for this listing. That count is place-of-performance geography in USAspending.gov assistance files, not a map of every project site. Those rows still sit under the $13,970,000,000 obligation total and the 3-recipient count. The program hub on SpendingVault holds the award rows behind those totals. Keep the series labeled as obligations from USAspending.gov assistance awards; do not swap in an outlay figure from another report.