Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Homevisiting Grant Program — CFDA 93.870

Home-visiting grant obligations at $2.35 billion

USAspending.gov records $2,350,368,752.90 in obligations under CFDA 93.870. Four hundred forty awards produce that stock. A simple average is about $5.34 million per award — consistent with multi-year state allocations rather than visit-level payments. That average is a quotient of two packet totals, not a typical family caseload cost or a per-visit amount.

The assistance-listing title is MATERNAL, INFANT AND EARLY CHILDHOOD HOMEVISITING GRANT PROGRAM. CFDA 93.870 is the identifier. Other maternal-and-child-health listings tagged under different CFDA numbers are not mixed into the $2.35 billion. Combining those codes would invent a combined home-visiting total this packet does not contain.

65 recipients across 56 jurisdictions

Sixty-five recipients share 440 awards, or about 6.8 award records per recipient on average. Splitting $2.35 billion evenly would assign about $36.2 million per recipient. That density is a state-agency portfolio: several award years or amendments per jurisdiction, not hundreds of local visiting programs on the federal extract. The packet does not list the 65. Recipient count is the organizational headcount on the federal award, not a census of families or home visitors.

Fifty-six jurisdictions in the geographic count cover states, territories, and additional coded entities in the USAspending state field. Formula dollars still vary by statute the packet does not reprint. Place-of-performance amounts are on the program table.

Award count is not a visit or family count

Among health-formula listings, 93.870 is a moderate-row file: 440 awards against 65 recipients. Multi-year awards and amendments can inflate award count relative to unique allocations. Award count is therefore a weak proxy for “number of home-visiting programs.” Recipients (65) tell you how many named organizations sit on the extract; awards (440) tell you how many assistance rows were stored.

The packet does not report visits completed, families enrolled, or infant-health outcomes. Citing 440 as visits or families would be a unit error. Keep the units straight: dollars, awards, recipients, jurisdictions.

Obligations versus home-visiting outlays

The $2.35 billion is an obligation total from USAspending.gov. Outlays — cash paid against MIECHV awards — are not in the packet. A state agency can show a large obligation stock while local programs draw down on a slower calendar. Deobligations and upward adjustments both move the total. A remaining-balance question is an outlay question this extract does not answer.

Use CFDA 93.870 to size this Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Homevisiting listing in the assistance file. Do not use it as a visit dashboard. Those series live elsewhere. This page reports the obligation book tagged 93.870.

What the 93.870 tables omit

The MIECHV hub lists award-backed obligations from USAspending.gov. It is not a family roster, not a nurse directory, and not an outcomes report. Series that never appear as assistance awards will not show up in the $2,350,368,752.90. That omission is definitional rather than a gap in the 440 award rows.

Place-of-performance on 56 jurisdictions is a coding field. Read the program page before treating those cells as equal shares. Recipient dollars, if shown on the hub, are still obligation amounts, not cash already spent on visits.

Where the 93.870 table lives

The program page overlays these four facts. The all-programs index ranks 93.870 among other assistance listings. Agency pages show awarding-agency rollups that may include this CFDA among other health listings. For 93.870 only, start on the program page.

CFDA 93.870’s 440 awards spread $2,350,368,752.90 across 65 recipients and 56 jurisdictions. Quote award count as a record count, recipient count as the organizational headcount, and dollars as obligations from USAspending.gov. About 6.8 award records per recipient is the density story on this listing. Outlays remain a separate column. Source: USAspending.gov assistance awards. Read 93.870 as a MIECHV formula book: 65 agencies, 56 jurisdictions, and about 6.8 rows per recipient. The $2.35 billion remains an obligation stock on USAspending.gov, not a visit or family census.

Questions

How much is obligated for maternal, infant and early childhood home visiting?

USAspending.gov records $2,350,368,752.90 in obligations for CFDA 93.870. SpendingVault indexes 440 awards, 65 recipients, and 56 jurisdictions. The figure is an obligation sum from assistance awards, not an outlay and not a visit count. CFDA 93.870’s $2.35 billion is the USAspending obligation stock.

How many awards does CFDA 93.870 carry?

The listing shows 440 awards against 65 recipients, or about 6.8 award records per recipient. A simple average is about $5.34 million per award. Award count is not a family or visit count. Recipient dollars are on the program page.

How many organizations receive 93.870 awards?

The extract lists 65 recipients. Those are organizational recipients on assistance awards tagged 93.870, typically state and territorial agencies rather than local visiting programs. Geographic coding covers 56 jurisdictions. The packet does not name the 65.

Is $2.35 billion already spent on home visits?

Not necessarily. Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. CFDA 93.870’s indexed total is the obligation stock from USAspending.gov. This page does not report cash drawn, remaining balances, or visits completed. The $2.35 billion on 440 awards is the obligation figure.