Florida vs Massachusetts on USAspending: $22.7B vs $13.5B
Florida accounts for $22.7B in federal obligations on USAspending.gov. Massachusetts accounts for $13.5B. Florida’s Census count of 23,372,215 dwarfs Massachusetts’s 7,136,171, yet spending per capita runs the other way: $161.99 in Florida versus $364.70 in Massachusetts. Florida logs 466,388 awards against 294,824. FY2026 obligations are $3.8B in Florida and $2.6B in Massachusetts.
Key figures
- Florida $22.7B vs Massachusetts $13.5B in USAspending obligations — Florida leads the stacked file.
- Populations: Florida 23,372,215 vs Massachusetts 7,136,171; per capita $161.99 vs $364.70.
- Florida has more awards (466,388 vs 294,824); FY2026 $3.8B vs $2.6B.
- Top industries: guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing (FL) vs aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing (MA).
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Florida’s $22.7B stock versus Massachusetts’s $13.5B
These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Florida’s $22.7B is about 1.7 times Massachusetts’s $13.5B. The comparison scores place of performance in the award file. Florida holds the larger all-years total, and that stock lines up with a much larger population of 23,372,215 against 7,136,171.
Award counts also favor Florida, though by a thinner margin than population. Florida has 466,388 awards; Massachusetts has 294,824. Florida’s file is heavier in dollars and busier in rows. Massachusetts’s $13.5B on 294,824 actions is still a large federal footprint; it is simply attached to a smaller stock than Florida’s $22.7B.
Massachusetts’s $364.70 per capita versus Florida’s $161.99
Florida’s 23,372,215 residents more than triple Massachusetts’s 7,136,171. After dividing the obligation stocks by those Census counts, Massachusetts shows $364.70 per capita and Florida shows $161.99. Intensity runs the opposite direction from the $22.7B versus $13.5B ranking. Population explains who has the larger stock; it does not explain who is more intensive.
A $364.70 per-person reading in Massachusetts on 7,136,171 residents is an intensity fact attached to a $13.5B stock. Florida’s $161.99 on 23,372,215 residents is attached to $22.7B. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not GDP. A large private economy in Florida can coexist with a thinner federal-award intensity.
Missiles and space vehicles in Florida, aircraft engines in Massachusetts
Florida’s top industry is guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing. Massachusetts’s is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Those labels mark the largest NAICS slice in each state’s file, not a full industrial census. Missile-and-space awards and engine-parts awards are different aerospace lead products sitting on $22.7B and $13.5B.
A missile-and-space lead can concentrate large production awards inside Florida’s 466,388-award file. An aircraft-engine lead can concentrate propulsion manufacturing inside Massachusetts’s 294,824-award file. Mix and scale both differ. Neither industry name explains every dollar in either state.
FY2026: $3.8B in Florida vs $2.6B in Massachusetts
FY2026 obligations are $3.8B in Florida and $2.6B in Massachusetts. Florida’s latest year remains ahead, matching the direction of the $22.7B versus $13.5B stacked ranking. Massachusetts’s $2.6B is a large slice of its $13.5B stock; Florida’s $3.8B is a sizable slice of $22.7B. Recency questions belong in FY2026.
Do not divide those FY figures by Florida’s 466,388 or Massachusetts’s 294,824 all-years awards. Per capita of $161.99 on 23,372,215 residents versus $364.70 on 7,136,171 residents is the intensity comparison that already reverses the population ranking. Both cuts are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Sun Belt stock, New England intensity
Florida leads stacked dollars ($22.7B vs $13.5B), award count (466,388 vs 294,824), population (23,372,215 vs 7,136,171), and FY2026 ($3.8B vs $2.6B). Massachusetts leads per capita ($364.70 vs $161.99). That intensity inversion is the distinctive fact in this pair.
Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing versus aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing is mix inside files that contain many other industries. Use the Florida and Massachusetts hubs for agencies and recipients. Keep $22.7B and $13.5B labeled as obligations.
How to use the Florida and Massachusetts hubs
Florida’s 23,372,215 residents and $22.7B stock versus Massachusetts’s 7,136,171 residents and $13.5B stock is a size ranking. The $161.99 versus $364.70 per-capita cut is an intensity ranking. They disagree. Open the Florida hub and the Massachusetts hub for agencies and recipients. Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing versus aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing is mix inside 466,388 and 294,824 awards.
FY2026’s $3.8B versus $2.6B follows Florida’s stacked lead. None of those figures are outlays. Do not treat a later cash payment as a rewrite of $22.7B versus $13.5B. Place of performance can differ from where a paying agency sits. Keep the pair labeled as USAspending.gov obligations so recency, stock, and intensity stay separate questions rather than a single slogan about which state is larger.
Florida versus Massachusetts is Sun Belt stock against New England intensity: $22.7B versus $13.5B, then $161.99 versus $364.70. Guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing and aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing sit on 466,388 and 294,824 awards. FY2026 of $3.8B versus $2.6B follows Florida. Census counts are 23,372,215 and 7,136,171. Obligations remain the unit. The Florida and Massachusetts hubs hold agencies and recipients. Florida’s 23,372,215 residents explain the larger $22.7B stock; they do not explain Massachusetts’s $364.70 intensity on 7,136,171 residents and $13.5B. Keep FY2026’s $3.8B versus $2.6B in the recency column.
Questions
- Which state has more federal spending, Florida or Massachusetts?
- Florida leads in stacked USAspending.gov obligations: $22.7B versus Massachusetts’s $13.5B. Florida has more awards (466,388 vs 294,824) and more people (23,372,215 vs 7,136,171). Spending per capita is $161.99 in Florida and $364.70 in Massachusetts. FY2026 obligations are $3.8B and $2.6B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.
- Why is Massachusetts’s per-capita federal spending higher than Florida’s?
- Massachusetts’s $13.5B on 7,136,171 residents produces $364.70 per capita. Florida’s $22.7B on 23,372,215 residents produces $161.99. Florida still leads the stacked file and the award count (466,388 vs 294,824). FY2026 also favors Florida ($3.8B vs $2.6B). Intensity and stock are different rankings in this pair.
- What industries lead Florida and Massachusetts federal awards?
- Florida’s top industry is guided missile and space vehicle manufacturing. Massachusetts’s is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Those slices sit on $22.7B and $13.5B in obligations. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award in either state. Award counts are 466,388 in Florida and 294,824 in Massachusetts.
- Are Florida vs Massachusetts figures Treasury outlays?
- No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $22.7B and $13.5B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $3.8B and $2.6B measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments. Place of performance can differ from where the paying agency sits.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.