USAspending in Iowa District 90 (non-voting / unspecified)
USAspending.gov attributes $20.0 billion in FY2024 federal obligations to Iowa District 90, across 3,876 awards. The exact sum is $20,044,504,442. Code 90 is a USAspending unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance bucket, not a 90th House seat. Iowa does not elect 90 members of Congress. Totals are obligations, not outlays, for FY2024 only.
Key figures
- Iowa District 90 FY2024 obligations were $20.0 billion on 3,876 awards.
- Code 90 is a USAspending unspecified or non-voting bucket, not a House seat.
- District is place of performance, not recipient HQ.
- Totals are obligations, not outlays.
- Facts cover FY2024 only.
What District 90 means in USAspending
USAspending uses 90 and 98 as unspecified or non-voting congressional-district codes on place of performance. For Iowa, 90 is that residual bin. The FY2024 obligation sum in the bin is $20.0 billion. The award count is 3,876 — a thin file next to a large dollar stock.
Do not read IA-90 as “the 90th district of Iowa.” Iowa’s House seats are numbered far below 90. The code marks awards whose Iowa performance location was not assigned to a standard numbered district field. It is a dataset bucket sitting on top of Iowa place of performance.
Three thousand eight hundred seventy-six rows in a residual file
Three thousand eight hundred seventy-six awards is a defined file for a leftover geography code. Those rows still sum to a defined dollar total: $20.0 billion in FY2024 obligations. Row count is not unique vendors. The same recipient can appear on many awards.
This packet does not provide a unique-recipient count or an agency split. Use the hub table to see how the 3,876 records break out; this guide only certifies the two rollup facts and the FY2024 window.
Place of performance inside Iowa, coded 90
Congressional district here is still place of performance, not recipient headquarters. A company based outside Iowa can appear in the $20.0 billion if USAspending codes the work to IA-90. An Iowa-headquartered firm can be missing if performance is coded to a numbered Iowa district or to another state.
HQ maps of the “Iowa market” will not match this page. The page answers a narrower question: FY2024 obligations whose performance district is the IA-90 bucket.
Obligations, not outlays, in FY2024
The $20.0 billion is an obligation total. Obligations are legal commitments recorded in USAspending. Outlays are payments. A single-year obligation stock is not a cash-flow statement for Iowa.
First year and last year are both 2024. This hub does not contain a second fiscal year for comparison. Report the number as FY2024 obligations for IA-90 place of performance, on 3,876 awards.
Iowa statewide and district index pages
The Iowa state page rolls Iowa place-of-performance activity at the state level. The IA-90 hub is this residual district code. The all-districts index lists other 90 and 98 buckets alongside numbered House districts. Those views share the same USAspending obligation source. Code 90 is a USAspending geography bucket, not a constituency voters elect.
How IA-90 sits next to numbered Iowa seats
The Iowa state page rolls statewide place-of-performance activity. IA-90 is narrower: 3,876 awards and $20.0 billion tagged to the unspecified 90 code. Those two views will not match dollar-for-dollar if numbered Iowa district codes exist in the source file. This packet only certifies the 90-code rollup.
A precise IA-90 citation is $20.0 billion in FY2024 USAspending obligations on 3,876 awards with unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance code 90. That is not a House seat and not a count of unique firms in Iowa. Vendors based outside Iowa can sit inside the $20.0 billion when performance is coded IA-90. Iowa-based vendors can sit outside it when performance is coded to a numbered district. Keep the $20.0 billion on a residual line in any Iowa table. Do not fold it into a numbered Iowa district. Obligations are commitments. Outlays are not this total. First year and last year are both 2024, so IA-90 has no trend line here.
Report IA-90 as a residual USAspending geography line, not as a constituency. $20.0 billion in FY2024 obligations on 3,876 awards is the certified rollup for unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance code 90 in Iowa. That is not a House seat voters elect, and 3,876 is not a unique-firm count. Vendors based outside Iowa can sit inside $20.0 billion when performance is tagged IA-90. Iowa-based vendors can sit outside it when performance is tagged to a numbered district. The Iowa state page is a wider grain and will not equal $20.0 billion if numbered Iowa codes exist in the source file. Keep $20.0 billion on a leftover line in any Iowa table. Do not fold it into a numbered district. Obligations are commitments recorded in USAspending.gov. Outlays are payments and are not this total. First year and last year are both 2024, so IA-90 has no trend line here. Later source corrections can revise both figures. Until then, cite $20.0 billion and 3,876 awards with IA-90 place of performance, FY2024 only, obligations not outlays, district 90 not a voting seat.
Questions
- How much did USAspending record for Iowa District 90 in FY2024?
- USAspending.gov shows $20.0 billion in FY2024 obligations for Iowa District 90 place of performance, across 3,876 awards. Code 90 is an unspecified or non-voting bucket. The figures are obligations, not outlays, and cover FY2024 only. Those figures are FY2024 USAspending obligations with IA-90 place of performance, covering 3,876 awards, not outlays and not a headquarters extract.
- Does Iowa have a 90th congressional district?
- No. USAspending’s 90 code is an unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance bucket in the award data. It is not a House seat voters elect. The $20.0 billion total is a residual geography code for Iowa performance location on 3,876 awards. Keep $20.0 billion and 3,876 as separate certified facts from USAspending.gov for fiscal year 2024 only.
- Why are there 3,876 awards on this page?
- That is the FY2024 award count USAspending ties to the IA-90 place-of-performance code. It is a record count, not a unique-vendor count. Those records sum to $20.0 billion in obligations. The packet does not break the file into agencies or award types.
- If a contractor is based in Iowa, is the award on this page?
- Only if place of performance is coded IA-90. Headquarters in Iowa is not the district field. Work performed in a numbered Iowa district or another state will not sit in this $20.0 billion total even when the recipient’s office is in Iowa.
Congressional district is USAspending place-of-performance, not the recipient HQ. District 90/98 are USAspending unspecified/non-voting buckets.