USAspending in Indiana District 09

The Indiana District 09 award file: 12,094 rows

12,094 awards share the IN-09 performance tag in FY2024. That count sits in a middle band: large enough that scanning every row by eye is impractical, and not so large that the file is only a six-figure action dump. The packet still does not invent a typical award from $7.6B and 12,094.

Keep 12,094 labeled as record volume. Repeat modifications add rows. The Indiana District 09 hub is the table. This packet does not rank the 9th district against other Indiana seats. IN-09 is Indiana's 9th mapped seat. 12,094 awards and $7.6B do not belong on the 2nd or 3rd district hubs.

$7.6B in FY2024 obligations

USAspending.gov records $7.6B ($7,584,573,581.03) as FY2024 obligations with IN-09 place of performance. SpendingVault reports that amount as obligations, not outlays. Indiana's operating budget is another series and is not this total. 12,094 awards share the IN-09 performance tag.

SpendingVault indexes IN-09 as FY2024 place-of-performance obligations only. The $7.6B figure does not include later fiscal years and does not convert 12,094 awards into unique firms. Cite the year as federal FY2024 when the 12,094-award count is reused. Federal FY2024 starts October 1.

Place of performance versus headquarters

Place of performance is the geography this page uses. Recipient headquarters can sit in another Indiana district or another state while the work is coded IN-09. The opposite pattern also appears: a District 09 address on the recipient file does not force every dollar onto this page. A recipient based outside the 9th can still appear among the 12,094 rows if place of performance is IN-09.

The Indiana District 09 page is not a directory of firms headquartered in the 9th district. It is an obligation roll-up for awards whose performance location is coded IN-09. That is why a Indiana company based outside District 09 can still appear, and why a local HQ can be absent. 12,094 awards follow the performance tag.

Obligations, not Treasury outlays

$7.6B is an obligation sum from FY2024 award records. Outlays are a different series. SpendingVault does not convert the Indiana District 09 obligation total into Treasury outlays. If a Indiana spending chart uses recipient location or calendar year 2024, it is not this page. Stay with place of performance, FY2024, and obligations when quoting $7.6B.

Do not brief $7.6B as money already spent in the 9th district. Brief it as FY2024 obligations on USAspending.gov with IN-09 place of performance. 12,094 awards are the matching action stock. Cash paid is a separate USAspending series this packet does not quote.

Why IN-09 is a mapped House seat

IN-09 names a voting House seat. Leftover 90/98 bins are separate USAspending codes, and 00 is reserved for at-large states. This 9th district file is none of those. If Indiana has unspecified performance rows, they are not inside the $7.6B mapped total. 12,094 awards already carry the numbered tag.

Open the Indiana page for the statewide obligation index, not as a substitute for IN-09. District 09 is one mapped performance geography. 12,094 awards and $7.6B stay on the 9th hub. Other Indiana district pages use the same format on the all-districts index.

Keeping Indiana District 09 on one series

The $7.6B FY2024 obligation total for IN-09 is an indexed USAspending.gov statistic. SpendingVault does not convert 12,094 awards into unique firms or cash paid, and it does not merge District 09 with a 90 leftover page. A complete citation names the 9th district, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $7.6B, and 12,094 awards.

The Indiana District 09 hub is the live table for IN-09. The Indiana page is the statewide obligation index. The all-districts index is the directory of other mapped seats and leftover codes. Quote $7.6B only with place of performance, federal FY2024, and the obligation series. IN-09 is Indiana's 9th mapped seat. 12,094 awards and $7.6B do not belong on the 2nd or 3rd district hubs.

Indiana District 09 can be quoted in one sentence: $7.6B in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations on 12,094 awards with IN-09 place of performance. The unrounded packet total is $7,584,573,581.03. That sentence already names the series (obligations), the year (federal FY2024), the geography (place of performance, not headquarters), and the district code (IN-09, a numbered 9th seat rather than leftover 90/98 or at-large 00). SpendingVault does not add a unique-recipient count, an agency mix, or an outlay conversion. Readers who need the underlying rows should open the Indiana District 09 hub; readers who need statewide Indiana should open the Indiana page. Do not average $7.6B across 12,094 awards. Do not fold unspecified Indiana leftover dollars into $7.6B. First year and last year in this extract are both 2024.

Questions

What is the FY2024 obligation total for IN-09?

The FY2024 obligation total for IN-09 is $7.6B, exactly $7,584,573,581.03 in the packet. That figure is USAspending.gov place-of-performance obligations, not outlays. 12,094 awards are counted in the same extract. The year window is FY2024 only.

How is IN-09 different from district 90 or 98?

No. District 09 is a numbered voting House seat. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting buckets. District 00 is the at-large code; IN-09 is the numbered 9th. The $7.6B total uses the IN-09 place-of-performance code. 12,094 awards share that same numbered tag.

Does place of performance match headquarters for Indiana District 09?

No. The district is place of performance. Recipients based outside the 9th can still appear on IN-09 if the performance location is coded to the 9th. A 9th-district headquarters can also map dollars to another district when performance is coded there. 12,094 awards follow the performance field, not HQ.

Can I treat $7.6B as cash spent in the 9th district?

No. $7.6B is not cash spent in the 9th district. It is FY2024 obligations. Outlays can lag or land in another fiscal year. Cite $7.6B with IN-09 place of performance and the obligation series. 12,094 awards are record volume, not a paid-invoice count.