Skip to main content
← All guides

FY2024 USAspending in Kansas District 01

Kansas District 01 shows $7.2B in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations for place of performance in the 1st district. The exact sum is $7,167,173,314.22 across 95,585 awards. Those dollars are award commitments, not outlays. KS-01 is a numbered House seat, not an unspecified 90 code. KS-01 is a thick Kansas extract: 95,585 awards sit beside $7.2B, so the action stock is large relative to many mapped seats. SpendingVault indexes the rows on the Kansas District 01 hub.

Key figures

  • Kansas District 01 shows $7.2B in FY2024 place-of-performance obligations.
  • 95,585 awards are counted for KS-01 in that FY2024 extract — a thick action file.
  • District 01 is a numbered House seat, not a 90/98 unspecified bucket or an at-large 00.
  • Geography is place of performance, not recipient headquarters.
  • Cite $7.2B as obligations, not outlays.

The $7.2B FY2024 commitment total

The $7.2B figure is the FY2024 obligation aggregate on awards whose place of performance is Kansas District 01. The exact sum is $7,167,173,314.22. Obligation means a recorded commitment. It is not Treasury cash already paid, and it is not Kansas's state budget. The matching record count is 95,585.

First year and last year in the packet are both 2024. Do not treat $7.2B as a multi-year stack. Federal fiscal years begin on October 1. Later USAspending.gov corrections can revise $7,167,173,314.22 and the 95,585-award count. Until then, cite both as the FY2024 KS-01 place-of-performance stock. Anyone stacking a later fiscal year onto $7.2B is adding a number this packet does not contain.

95,585 awards on a thick KS-01 file

95,585 is the FY2024 record count for KS-01 place of performance beside $7.2B. A file this thick usually mixes contracts, assistance actions, and modifications; each can add a line. The packet does not publish unique recipients, so 95,585 is not a vendor census of Kansas. A high award count does not by itself prove many small actions or a few large ones — this packet has no size table.

Do not divide $7.2B by 95,585. That quotient is not in the packet. Keep the dollar total and the row count as separate facts and use the Kansas District 01 hub to inspect lines. Modifications can add rows without turning the extract into a unique-firm list. KS-01 is a thick Kansas extract: 95,585 awards sit beside $7.2B, so the action stock is large relative to many mapped seats.

Performance geography, not a 1st-district HQ map

Even for a numbered Kansas seat, the district field is still place of performance, not recipient headquarters. A contractor based in another Kansas district or another state can appear on KS-01 if the performance location is coded to the 1st. A 1st-district headquarters can post dollars to another district when performance is coded there. The 95,585 rows follow that field, not the contractor's legal address.

KS-01 dollars are tagged by where USAspending records performance, not by where a firm files its HQ. That split matters for $7.2B: work performed in the 1st district can land here even if the vendor sits elsewhere. Work performed outside the 1st does not enter this file merely because a headquarters is local. Recipient-location maps are a different cut from this $7.2B file.

KS-01 versus leftover codes 90 and 98

Kansas District 01 is a mapped House district. District 90 and district 98 are USAspending unspecified and non-voting bins. District 00 is the at-large code used in single-seat states; KS-01 is the numbered 1st, not an at-large 00. KS-01 is not a leftover. Unspecified Kansas performance, if any, would live on a 90 page rather than inside this table. The $7.2B total uses the KS-01 place-of-performance code. 95,585 awards share that same numbered tag.

The Kansas state hub is the statewide obligation view. KS-01 is the 1st-district place-of-performance page. They are related but not interchangeable. This packet does not quote a statewide Kansas total and does not rank the 1st against other districts. Use the all-districts index to open other Kansas place-of-performance pages in the same format. Numbered seats and 90/98 leftovers are listed side by side in that index; they are not interchangeable geographies.

Obligations versus outlays

The $7.2B total is the obligation series. Outlays measure disbursements and can lag. SpendingVault does not recast KS-01 as cash paid. Mixing the two series makes the 1st district look inconsistent when the files are measuring different events. An FY2024 obligation can fund later invoices.

Recipient-location maps, calendar-year totals, and state budget documents are other products. Match geography, year, and series before treating a disagreement with $7.2B as an error. Cite KS-01 as FY2024 USAspending.gov place-of-performance obligations of $7.2B on 95,585 awards. Do not mix that total into an outlay sheet or a headquarters extract.

How to quote Kansas's 1st without mixing codes

A complete KS-01 citation names numbered District 01, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $7.2B, and 95,585 awards. Calling the code unspecified would confuse it with district 90. The Kansas District 01 hub is the table. The Kansas state page is the statewide roll-up. The all-districts index lists other Kansas seats in the same format.

The Kansas District 01 hub is the live table for KS-01. The Kansas page is the statewide obligation index. The all-districts index is the directory of other mapped seats and leftover codes. Quote $7.2B only with place of performance, federal FY2024, and the obligation series. KS-01 is a thick Kansas extract: 95,585 awards sit beside $7.2B, so the action stock is large relative to many mapped seats.

Kansas District 01 can be quoted in one sentence: $7.2B in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations on 95,585 awards with KS-01 place of performance. The unrounded packet total is $7,167,173,314.22. That sentence already names the series (obligations), the year (federal FY2024), the geography (place of performance, not headquarters), and the district code (KS-01, a numbered 1st seat rather than leftover 90/98 or at-large 00). SpendingVault does not add a unique-recipient count, an agency mix, or an outlay conversion. Readers who need the underlying rows should open the Kansas District 01 hub; readers who need statewide Kansas should open the Kansas page. Do not average $7.2B across 95,585 awards. Do not fold unspecified Kansas leftover dollars into $7.2B. First year and last year in this extract are both 2024.

Questions

How much federal spending is in Kansas District 01?
USAspending.gov shows $7.2B in FY2024 obligations with place of performance in Kansas District 01. The exact sum is $7,167,173,314.22. That is not an outlay total and not Kansas's state budget. The extract counts 95,585 awards for KS-01 in FY2024. The packet year range is FY2024 only.
Is Kansas District 01 an unspecified 90 bucket?
No. District 01 is a numbered voting House seat. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting buckets. District 00 is the at-large code; KS-01 is the numbered 1st. The $7.2B total uses the KS-01 place-of-performance code. 95,585 awards share that same numbered tag.
Are Kansas 1st-district dollars based on contractor headquarters?
No. The district is place of performance. Recipients based outside the 1st can still appear on KS-01 if the performance location is coded to the 1st. A 1st-district headquarters can also map dollars to another district when performance is coded there. 95,585 awards follow the performance field, not HQ.
Is $7.2B in KS-01 already paid out?
No. $7.2B is an obligation sum from FY2024 award records. Outlays are a different series. SpendingVault does not convert the Kansas District 01 obligation total into Treasury outlays. Cite the figure with the obligation label, the FY2024 window, and KS-01 place of performance. 95,585 awards are the matching record count.

Congressional district is USAspending place-of-performance, not the recipient HQ. District 90/98 are USAspending unspecified/non-voting buckets.