Does Kansas or Mississippi have more federal spending?

Kansas leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations by a slim margin, $2.91B to Mississippi’s $2.88B. Mississippi leads spending per capita, $115.31 versus $67.40, and awards, 233,003 versus 71,423. Census counts are close: 2,970,606 versus 2,943,045. FY2026 obligations are $200.2M in Kansas and $339.4M in Mississippi.

Why does Mississippi have more awards if the dollar totals are close?

The packet reports 233,003 awards in Mississippi and 71,423 in Kansas on stocks of $2.88B and $2.91B. Award count is a row total, not average size. Spending per capita is $115.31 versus $67.40. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

What industries lead in Kansas and Mississippi?

Kansas’s top industry is computer systems design services. Mississippi’s is ship building and repairing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $2.91B and $2.88B. Award counts are 71,423 in Kansas and 233,003 in Mississippi.

Are Kansas vs Mississippi figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $2.91B and $2.88B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $200.2M and $339.4M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($67.40 vs $115.31) uses Census population where present.

← All guides

Kansas vs Mississippi on USAspending: $2.91B vs $2.88B

Kansas and Mississippi sit almost on top of each other on stacked USAspending.gov obligations: $2.91B versus $2.88B. Census counts are nearly even too—2,970,606 in Kansas and 2,943,045 in Mississippi. The files then diverge. Mississippi’s spending per capita is $115.31 against Kansas’s $67.40. Mississippi files 233,003 awards against Kansas’s 71,423. FY2026 obligations are $200.2M in Kansas and $339.4M in Mississippi. Computer systems design services lead Kansas; ship building and repairing lead Mississippi. The figures are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

Kansas $2.91B vs Mississippi $2.88B in stacked USAspending obligations.
Mississippi per capita $115.31 vs Kansas $67.40 on 2,943,045 vs 2,970,606 residents.
Awards: 71,423 vs 233,003; FY2026 $200.2M vs $339.4M.
Top industries: computer systems design in Kansas; ship building in Mississippi.
Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

A $30 million stock gap on matching Census counts

Kansas’s $2.91B and Mississippi’s $2.88B are close enough that the ranking is a rounding story on the stacked total. Census counts of 2,970,606 and 2,943,045 are also close. Spending per capita is not: $67.40 versus $115.31. The packet’s per-capita figures sit beside those Census counts; they are not a second independent series.

Award volume is the Mississippi story. 233,003 awards versus 71,423 means Mississippi’s file is dense in rows on a nearly identical stock. Kansas’s 71,423 actions sit on $2.91B.

FY2026 favors Mississippi on recency: $339.4M versus $200.2M. Cite USAspending.gov for the stacked stocks and the latest-year amounts.

Kansas’s $2.91B and Mississippi’s $2.88B should be read with the award file: 71,423 versus 233,003. A near-tie stock can hide a dense Gulf file. Both stocks are USAspending.gov obligations. FY2026 of $200.2M versus $339.4M favors Mississippi on recency.

Computer systems design services versus ship building and repairing is mix. Spending per capita of $67.40 versus $115.31 uses Census counts of 2,970,606 and 2,943,045. Outlays are not listed. Do not invent average award size.

Systems design versus ship building

Kansas’s lead NAICS is computer systems design services. Mississippi’s lead NAICS is ship building and repairing. Those peaks sit on $2.91B and $2.88B. Systems design is a first read on Kansas’s mix; shipyards are a first read on Mississippi’s mix.

The 71,423 Kansas awards and 233,003 Mississippi awards include many actions outside those labels. Use the Kansas and Mississippi state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes.

FY2026: $200.2M versus $339.4M

Fiscal year 2026 obligations are $200.2M in Kansas and $339.4M in Mississippi. Recency does not preserve Kansas’s slim stacked dollar lead. Treat the year as a recency slice of obligations, not as Treasury cash.

Do not divide $200.2M or $339.4M by 71,423 or 233,003 all-years awards. Spending per capita of $67.40 and $115.31 already sits beside Census counts of 2,970,606 and 2,943,045.

Three times the awards on a near-tie stock

Mississippi’s 233,003 awards against Kansas’s 71,423 is the row gap. Dollars are nearly even: $2.88B versus $2.91B. Population is nearly even: 2,943,045 versus 2,970,606. Per capita of $115.31 versus $67.40 and FY2026 of $339.4M versus $200.2M are Mississippi’s other wins.

Keep those per-capita figures labeled as Census-based packet figures on USAspending.gov obligations. They are not outlays per resident.

A near-tie stock with a shipyard award mill

Kansas’s $2.91B and Mississippi’s $2.88B are close. Census counts of 2,970,606 and 2,943,045 are close. Awards are not: 71,423 versus 233,003. Those rows are USAspending.gov obligation actions, not cash payments.

Computer systems design services lead Kansas. Ship building and repairing lead Mississippi. Spending per capita of $67.40 versus $115.31 is the intensity split on nearly even headcount.

FY2026 of $200.2M versus $339.4M favors Mississippi on recency. That slice does not erase Kansas’s slim stacked lead. Outlays are not in the packet.

Readers who stop at $2.91B versus $2.88B will miss 233,003 versus 71,423 awards and $115.31 versus $67.40 per capita. Read the packet’s cuts together.

Do not invent average award size. Cite USAspending.gov. Use the comparison hub for tables and the Kansas and Mississippi hubs for agencies and recipients.

How to read Kansas versus Mississippi

Read Kansas first on a slim stacked-dollar lead ($2.91B vs $2.88B) and a slim Census lead (2,970,606 vs 2,943,045). Read Mississippi first on spending per capita ($115.31 vs $67.40), awards (233,003 vs 71,423), and FY2026 ($339.4M vs $200.2M). Note computer systems design versus ship building.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Kansas and Mississippi hubs hold agencies and recipients. Outlays are a different series.

Questions

Does Kansas or Mississippi have more federal spending?: Kansas leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations by a slim margin, $2.91B to Mississippi’s $2.88B. Mississippi leads spending per capita, $115.31 versus $67.40, and awards, 233,003 versus 71,423. Census counts are close: 2,970,606 versus 2,943,045. FY2026 obligations are $200.2M in Kansas and $339.4M in Mississippi.
Why does Mississippi have more awards if the dollar totals are close?: The packet reports 233,003 awards in Mississippi and 71,423 in Kansas on stocks of $2.88B and $2.91B. Award count is a row total, not average size. Spending per capita is $115.31 versus $67.40. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
What industries lead in Kansas and Mississippi?: Kansas’s top industry is computer systems design services. Mississippi’s is ship building and repairing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $2.91B and $2.88B. Award counts are 71,423 in Kansas and 233,003 in Mississippi.
Are Kansas vs Mississippi figures Treasury outlays?: No. The $2.91B and $2.88B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $200.2M and $339.4M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($67.40 vs $115.31) uses Census population where present.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.