Massachusetts vs Missouri on USAspending: $13.5B vs $10.4B
Massachusetts accounts for $13.5B in federal obligations on USAspending.gov. Missouri accounts for $10.4B. Census counts are in the same band — 7,136,171 in Massachusetts and 6,245,466 in Missouri — and so are award counts: 294,824 versus 300,867. Spending per capita is $364.70 in Massachusetts and $262.46 in Missouri. FY2026 obligations are $2.6B in Massachusetts and $1.6B in Missouri.
Key figures
- Massachusetts $13.5B vs Missouri $10.4B in USAspending obligations — Massachusetts leads the stacked file.
- Populations: Massachusetts 7,136,171 vs Missouri 6,245,466; per capita $364.70 vs $262.46.
- Award counts are close (294,824 vs 300,867); FY2026 $2.6B vs $1.6B.
- Top industries: aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing (MA) vs aircraft manufacturing (MO).
- Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.
Massachusetts’s $13.5B versus Missouri’s $10.4B
These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Massachusetts’s $13.5B is about 1.3 times Missouri’s $10.4B. The comparison scores place of performance in the award file. Among two mid-size states, the award-dollar lead belongs to Massachusetts in this aggregate even though Missouri’s row count is slightly higher.
Award counts nearly match. Missouri has 300,867 awards; Massachusetts has 294,824. Missouri’s file is slightly busier in rows and lighter in dollars. Massachusetts’s $13.5B on 294,824 actions implies a heavier typical booking than Missouri’s $10.4B on 300,867 records. Dollars and rows do not tell the same story.
Similar populations, Massachusetts ahead per person
Massachusetts’s 7,136,171 residents exceed Missouri’s 6,245,466, but not by enough to explain the full dollar gap. After dividing the obligation stocks by those Census counts, Massachusetts shows $364.70 per capita and Missouri shows $262.46. Intensity favors Massachusetts in the same direction as the $13.5B versus $10.4B ranking.
A $364.70 per-person reading in Massachusetts on 7,136,171 residents is an intensity fact attached to $13.5B. Missouri’s $262.46 on 6,245,466 residents is attached to $10.4B. This table scores USAspending place of performance, not GDP. Two similar Census counts can still produce different intensity.
Aircraft engines in Massachusetts, aircraft in Missouri
Massachusetts’s top industry is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Missouri’s is aircraft manufacturing. Those labels mark the largest NAICS slice in each state’s file, not a full industrial census. Engine-parts awards and airframe awards are related aerospace lead products sitting on $13.5B and $10.4B, not identical files.
An aircraft-engine lead can concentrate propulsion manufacturing inside Massachusetts’s 294,824-award file. An aircraft-manufacturing lead can concentrate airframe production inside Missouri’s 300,867-award file. Mix and scale both differ. Neither industry name explains every dollar.
FY2026: $2.6B in Massachusetts vs $1.6B in Missouri
FY2026 obligations are $2.6B in Massachusetts and $1.6B in Missouri. Massachusetts’s latest year remains ahead, matching the direction of the $13.5B versus $10.4B stacked ranking. Recency questions belong in FY2026. The stacked totals remain the full USAspending.gov aggregate this comparison uses. Both years are obligations, not outlays.
Do not divide those FY figures by Massachusetts’s 294,824 or Missouri’s 300,867 all-years awards. Per capita of $364.70 on 7,136,171 residents versus $262.46 on 6,245,466 residents is the intensity comparison. Both cuts are USAspending.gov obligations.
Two aerospace leads, one dollar ranking
Massachusetts leads stacked dollars ($13.5B vs $10.4B), population (7,136,171 vs 6,245,466), per capita ($364.70 vs $262.46), and FY2026 ($2.6B vs $1.6B). Missouri leads award count by a thin margin (300,867 vs 294,824). That near-match in rows on unequal dollars is the distinctive fact in this pair.
Aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing versus aircraft manufacturing is mix inside files that contain many other industries. Use the Massachusetts and Missouri hubs for agencies and recipients. Keep $13.5B and $10.4B labeled as obligations.
How to use the Massachusetts and Missouri hubs
Award counts of 294,824 and 300,867 sit on $13.5B and $10.4B — similar rows, unequal dollars. Census counts of 7,136,171 and 6,245,466 are also in the same band. Open the Massachusetts hub and the Missouri hub for agencies and recipients. Aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing versus aircraft manufacturing are related aerospace lead slices, not identical files.
Per capita of $364.70 versus $262.46 and FY2026 of $2.6B versus $1.6B both follow Massachusetts’s stacked lead. These are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays. Do not divide latest-year dollars by all-years award counts. Place of performance can differ from the paying agency’s location. Use the hubs when the next question is who received the awards. Keep $13.5B and $10.4B labeled as obligations.
Massachusetts versus Missouri is similar rows on unequal dollars: 294,824 awards on $13.5B against 300,867 awards on $10.4B. Aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing and aircraft manufacturing are related aerospace leads. FY2026 of $2.6B versus $1.6B follows Massachusetts. Per capita is $364.70 versus $262.46 on 7,136,171 and 6,245,466 residents. Obligations are not outlays. The Massachusetts and Missouri hubs hold agencies and recipients. Award counts of 294,824 and 300,867 look interchangeable until $13.5B meets $10.4B. Aircraft engines versus aircraft manufacturing are related leads on 7,136,171 and 6,245,466 residents. FY2026’s $2.6B versus $1.6B follows Massachusetts. Keep $13.5B and $10.4B labeled as USAspending.gov obligations on this pair.
Questions
- Which state has more federal spending, Massachusetts or Missouri?
- Massachusetts leads in USAspending.gov obligations: $13.5B versus Missouri’s $10.4B. Award counts are close: 294,824 in Massachusetts and 300,867 in Missouri. Populations are 7,136,171 and 6,245,466. Spending per capita is $364.70 in Massachusetts and $262.46 in Missouri. FY2026 obligations are $2.6B and $1.6B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays.
- Do Massachusetts and Missouri have similar award counts?
- Yes. Missouri logs 300,867 awards and Massachusetts logs 294,824, a thin gap, while Massachusetts still leads dollars ($13.5B vs $10.4B). Populations are also in the same band (7,136,171 vs 6,245,466). Per capita is $364.70 versus $262.46. Similar row counts do not imply similar stocks.
- What industries lead Massachusetts and Missouri federal awards?
- Massachusetts’s top industry is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Missouri’s is aircraft manufacturing. Those slices sit on $13.5B and $10.4B in obligations. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award in either state. Award counts are 294,824 in Massachusetts and 300,867 in Missouri.
- Are Massachusetts vs Missouri figures Treasury outlays?
- No. SpendingVault uses USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. The $13.5B and $10.4B stacked totals and FY2026 amounts of $2.6B and $1.6B measure award commitments by place of performance, not Monthly Treasury Statement payments. Place of performance can differ from where the paying agency sits.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.