Massachusetts vs Texas on USAspending: aircraft engines vs pharma

Aircraft engines in Massachusetts, pharmaceuticals in Texas

Massachusetts’s largest industry slice is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Texas’s largest industry slice is pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Those peaks sit on $13.5B and $72.7B in USAspending.gov obligations. They are different NAICS headlines, not a shared production line. A lead label does not describe every one of 294,824 or 530,634 awards.

Massachusetts’s $364.70 per capita on 7,136,171 residents is a strong intensity reading that still sits below Texas’s $686.10. Mix is the first fact worth holding in this pair because the two files do not wear the same industrial tag. Scale still follows: $13.5B versus $72.7B remains the stacked scoreboard.

$13.5B vs $72.7B on uneven population

These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award. Massachusetts has 7,136,171 residents and $364.70 per capita. Texas has 31,290,831 residents and $686.10 per capita. People and intensity can disagree with the dollar ranking and with each other. The table reports all three.

Aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing can concentrate large propulsion awards inside 294,824 Massachusetts actions. Pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing can concentrate production awards inside 530,634 Texas actions. Different peaks, different stacks. Award counts of 294,824 and 530,634 add a fourth ranking. A construction peak, a manufacturing peak, or a services peak can live on busy or sparse row files. The NAICS tag does not encode row volume.

FY2026: $2.6B vs $21.5B

FY2026 obligations are $2.6B in Massachusetts and $21.5B in Texas. Recency can track the stacked $13.5B versus $72.7B gap or it can shift. Either way it is still obligations, not outlays, and it should not be divided by all-years award counts.

Per capita of $364.70 and $686.10 uses 7,136,171 and 31,290,831 against the stacked stock. FY2026 is a different cut. Keep them separate.

$364.70 per person is not $686.10

After the industry tags, return to the scoreboard: $13.5B versus $72.7B, 294,824 versus 530,634 awards, $364.70 versus $686.10 per person. Those numbers do not argue for or against aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing or pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. They locate two statewide files on USAspending.gov.

Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the Massachusetts and Texas state hubs for agencies and recipients. Place of performance can differ from headquarters. That caveat applies to both peaks equally.

How to read Massachusetts against Texas

Read mix first (aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing vs pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing), then stock ($13.5B vs $72.7B), then intensity ($364.70 vs $686.10), then rows (294,824 vs 530,634), then FY2026 ($2.6B vs $21.5B). That order is a reading path, not a ranking of importance.

These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award. Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the Massachusetts and Texas state hubs for agencies and recipients.

Engine parts on $13.5B, pharmaceuticals on $72.7B

Massachusetts’s $364.70 per capita on 7,136,171 residents is hotter than many large-state readings and still cooler than Texas’s $686.10 on 31,290,831 residents. Aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing versus pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing is the mix contrast on $13.5B and $72.7B. Award counts of 294,824 versus 530,634 follow dollars more than they invert them.

FY2026’s $2.6B versus $21.5B is recency on the same USAspending.gov series. Outlays can lag. Place of performance can differ from headquarters. Use the Massachusetts and Texas hubs for agencies and recipients after the statewide scoreboard is clear.

Massachusetts versus Texas on USAspending.gov is $13.5B versus $72.7B in stacked obligations, 294,824 versus 530,634 awards, 7,136,171 versus 31,290,831 residents, $364.70 versus $686.10 per capita, and $2.6B versus $21.5B in FY2026. Top industries remain aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing and pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Those cuts are the packet.

Do not divide FY2026 dollars by all-years award counts. Do not treat $364.70 and $686.10 as household income. Do not treat aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing or pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing as a complete industrial census. Place of performance can differ from headquarters. Cash outlays can lag. After the comparison table, the Massachusetts and Texas state hubs hold agencies and recipients.

Questions

Which has more federal spending, Massachusetts or Texas?

Massachusetts shows $13.5B in USAspending.gov obligations; Texas shows $72.7B. Award counts are 294,824 and 530,634. Populations are 7,136,171 and 31,290,831. Spending per capita is $364.70 versus $686.10. FY2026 obligations are $2.6B and $21.5B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

What industries lead Massachusetts and Texas federal awards?

Massachusetts’s top industry is aircraft engine and engine parts manufacturing. Texas’s top industry is pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing. Those slices sit on $13.5B and $72.7B in USAspending.gov obligations and on 294,824 versus 530,634 awards. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award.

How do Massachusetts and Texas compare on spending per capita?

Spending per capita is $364.70 in Massachusetts on 7,136,171 residents and $686.10 in Texas on 31,290,831 residents. Those ratios use stacked USAspending.gov obligations of $13.5B and $72.7B, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Are Massachusetts vs Texas figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $13.5B and $72.7B stacked totals, and FY2026 amounts of $2.6B and $21.5B, are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Award counts are 294,824 and 530,634. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.