USAspending in Maryland District 07, FY2024

Fourteen thousand two hundred twenty-six awards

USAspending.gov ties 14,226 award records to Maryland District 07 place of performance in FY2024. Those records sum to $22.9 billion in obligations. Fourteen thousand two hundred twenty-six is a record count, not a unique-firm census. Task orders and modifications can each add a row without adding a new vendor.

The packet does not publish an agency mix. Do not divide $22.9 billion by 14,226 and treat the quotient as a typical contract. Keep the dollar total and the row count as separate facts.

Performance coded to MD-07

The district field is place of performance. Recipients headquartered outside District 07 can still appear in the $22.9 billion if USAspending codes the work to MD-07. Maryland-based firms can be missing when performance is tagged to Maryland District 06, District 01, Maryland’s 90 leftover, or another state.

HQ lists of “7th district contractors” will not reproduce this extract. The page answers where performance was coded, not where the vendor’s mailroom sits. This packet does not quote those other Maryland districts’ dollars.

Mapped House seat, not a residual bin

Maryland District 07 is a voting congressional district. USAspending uses 90 and 98 for unspecified or non-voting place-of-performance buckets. This hub’s $22.9 billion is mapped to numbered code 07. Residual Maryland performance would sit on a 90 page if that code exists in the source file.

The Maryland state page is the statewide place-of-performance rollup. It will not match $22.9 billion. Use the all-districts index to compare formats across seats.

FY2024 obligations only

First year and last year are both 2024. There is no District 07 year-over-year series in these facts. Federal FY2024 starts October 1. Later source corrections can revise $22.9 billion and the 14,226-award count.

Obligations are commitments. Outlays are payments. SpendingVault does not convert the MD-07 total into cash disbursed inside the 7th district. Cite $22,936,491,357 as FY2024 obligations with MD-07 place of performance.

Maryland hubs next to this page

The Maryland District 07 hub is the table. The Maryland state page rolls statewide performance. The all-districts index lists other Maryland numbered districts and unspecified 90/98 codes. None of those other pages’ dollars are inside this packet.

What the MD-07 citation should include

Name Maryland District 07, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $22.9 billion, and 14,226 awards. Keep the code on a numbered-seat row, not on a 90/98 residual line. Headquarters without an MD-07 tag do not enter the file.

The 14,226-award count is a single-year record stock. It is not 14,226 unique companies. The Maryland District 07 hub is the place to inspect the mix; this guide only certifies the two rollup facts and the FY2024 window.

Maryland District 07 can be briefed as $22.9 billion in FY2024 obligations on 14,226 awards with numbered code MD-07. The 14,226-award count is a single-year action stock beside $22.9 billion. It is not a unique-vendor census. Keep other Maryland numbered districts and any District 90 leftover on other rows. None of their totals sits inside $22.9 billion. This packet does not supply those other dollars. What it supplies is MD-07 place-of-performance commitments from USAspending.gov, not outlays, not a headquarters extract, and not a multi-year series. A headquarters in the 7th without a MD-07 tag does not enter this file. Work coded to MD-07 from a vendor based elsewhere does enter $22.9 billion. The Maryland state page rolls all Maryland codes and will not equal $22.9 billion. FY2024 is the only year in the facts. Federal FY2024 starts October 1. Later USAspending corrections can revise both the dollar sum and the award count. Until a later extract, report $22.9 billion and 14,226 awards for MD-07 place of performance as obligations, not outlays.

Maryland District 07 can be briefed as $22.9 billion in FY2024 obligations on 14,226 awards with numbered code MD-07. Fourteen thousand two hundred twenty-six is an action stock, not unique companies. Keep other Maryland numbered districts and any District 90 leftover on other rows. None of their totals sits inside $22.9 billion. A headquarters in the 7th without an MD-07 tag does not enter this file. The Maryland state page rolls all Maryland codes and will not equal $22.9 billion. Cite USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $22.9 billion, and 14,226 awards, FY2024 only.

Questions

How much federal spending is in Maryland District 07?

USAspending.gov records $22.9 billion in FY2024 obligations with Maryland District 07 place of performance, across 14,226 awards. That is not an outlay total and not a headquarters extract. The packet year range is FY2024 only. Those figures are FY2024 USAspending obligations with MD-07 place of performance, covering 14,226 awards, not outlays and not a headquarters extract.

Is Maryland District 07 a 90 unspecified bucket?

No. District 07 is a numbered Maryland House seat. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting bins. The $22.9 billion total uses the MD-07 place-of-performance code. 14,226 awards share that tag. Keep $22.9 billion and 14,226 as separate certified facts from USAspending.gov for fiscal year 2024 only.

Are Maryland District 07 dollars based on contractor HQ?

No. The district is place of performance. Recipients based outside the 7th can still appear if performance is coded MD-07. A District 07 headquarters can map dollars to another district when performance is coded there. The MD-07 tag is the geography rule; an office address in Maryland is neither required nor enough to enter the 14,226 records.

Does 14,226 awards mean 14,226 companies?

No. 14,226 is the FY2024 award-record count for MD-07 place of performance. Modifications and assistance actions can each add a row. The packet does not publish unique recipients. Those records sum to $22.9 billion in obligations. Cite the figure with the obligation label, the FY2024 window, and MD-07 place of performance rather than recipient headquarters.