Maryland vs Pennsylvania on USAspending: $30.1B vs $28.1B

A $30.1B vs $28.1B photo finish

Maryland at $30.1B and Pennsylvania at $28.1B are both large statewide files. The interesting question is which ranking disagrees. Award counts are 229,316 versus 1,468,918. Populations are 6,263,220 versus 13,078,751. Per capita is $315.60 versus $239.68. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award.

Pennsylvania’s 1,468,918 awards on $28.1B make Maryland’s 229,316 awards on $30.1B look sparse and heavy. A close or mid-range dollar gap can hide a wide row gap or a wide intensity gap. This pair is built for that kind of split, not for a blowout stock ranking.

Computer services vs medicinal manufacturing

Maryland’s top industry is other computer related services. Pennsylvania’s top industry is medicinal and botanical manufacturing. Two large files can still wear different NAICS peaks. Other computer related services versus medicinal and botanical manufacturing is a services-versus-manufacturing split on two files that are almost tied in stacked dollars. FY2026’s $3.1B Pennsylvania lead is the recency disagreement.

Industry tags on $30.1B and $28.1B are peaks inside mixed statewide aggregates. They do not license a one-industry story for 229,316 or 1,468,918 awards. Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the Maryland and Pennsylvania state hubs for agencies and recipients.

FY2026 flips: $2.0B vs $3.1B

FY2026 obligations are $2.0B in Maryland and $3.1B in Pennsylvania. Recency may favor a different leader than the stacked stock, or it may agree. Either result is still obligations. Do not divide latest-year dollars by all-years award counts.

Per capita of $315.60 and $239.68 stays on 6,263,220 and 13,078,751 against stacked $30.1B and $28.1B. FY2026 is the recency slice.

1.47 million Pennsylvania awards vs 229,316 in Maryland

When two files are both large, the comparison is a ranking puzzle: dollars, rows, people, intensity, mix, recency. $30.1B versus $28.1B is the stock piece. 229,316 versus 1,468,918 is the row piece. $315.60 versus $239.68 is the intensity piece.

These figures are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance, not Treasury outlays. Cash payments can lag award dates. Headquarters can differ from the state coded on the award. Use the comparison hub for the side-by-side tables, then the Maryland and Pennsylvania state hubs for agencies and recipients.

How to read two mid-Atlantic files

Read this pair without forcing a single winner. other computer related services versus medicinal and botanical manufacturing is mix. FY2026 ($2.0B vs $3.1B) is recency. The stacked totals remain $30.1B versus $28.1B on USAspending.gov.

Place of performance can differ from headquarters. That caveat is shared. It does not flatten the ranking splits this pair actually shows.

Stacked dollars to Maryland, recency to Pennsylvania

Maryland’s $30.1B versus Pennsylvania’s $28.1B is a thin stacked edge. Pennsylvania’s FY2026 $3.1B versus Maryland’s $2.0B is a recency edge. Rows (1,468,918 vs 229,316) and people (13,078,751 vs 6,263,220) go to Pennsylvania. Intensity ($315.60 vs $239.68) goes to Maryland. Those figures remain obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Five rankings, two leaders. Computer services versus medicinal manufacturing is mix. All cuts are USAspending.gov obligations. Use the Maryland and Pennsylvania hubs for detail.

Maryland versus Pennsylvania on USAspending.gov is $30.1B versus $28.1B in stacked obligations, 229,316 versus 1,468,918 awards, 6,263,220 versus 13,078,751 residents, $315.60 versus $239.68 per capita, and $2.0B versus $3.1B in FY2026. Top industries remain other computer related services and medicinal and botanical manufacturing. Those cuts are the packet.

Do not divide FY2026 dollars by all-years award counts. Do not treat $315.60 and $239.68 as household income. Do not treat other computer related services or medicinal and botanical manufacturing as a complete industrial census. Place of performance can differ from headquarters. Cash outlays can lag. After the comparison table, the Maryland and Pennsylvania state hubs hold agencies and recipients. FY2026 still shows $2.0B in Maryland and $3.1B in Pennsylvania, the recency ranking that disagrees with the stacked $30.1B versus $28.1B stock.

Questions

Which has more federal spending, Maryland or Pennsylvania?

Maryland shows $30.1B in USAspending.gov obligations; Pennsylvania shows $28.1B. Award counts are 229,316 and 1,468,918. Populations are 6,263,220 and 13,078,751. Spending per capita is $315.60 versus $239.68. FY2026 obligations are $2.0B and $3.1B. These are obligations, not Treasury outlays. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

What industries lead Maryland and Pennsylvania federal awards?

Maryland’s top industry is other computer related services. Pennsylvania’s top industry is medicinal and botanical manufacturing. Those slices sit on $30.1B and $28.1B in USAspending.gov obligations and on 229,316 versus 1,468,918 awards. They mark the largest grouping in each file, not every award.

How do Maryland and Pennsylvania compare on spending per capita?

Spending per capita is $315.60 in Maryland on 6,263,220 residents and $239.68 in Pennsylvania on 13,078,751 residents. Those ratios use stacked USAspending.gov obligations of $30.1B and $28.1B, not FY2026 alone and not GDP. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Are Maryland vs Pennsylvania figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $30.1B and $28.1B stacked totals, and FY2026 amounts of $2.0B and $3.1B, are USAspending.gov obligations by place of performance. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Award counts are 229,316 and 1,468,918. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.