FY2024 USAspending in Michigan District 03

The $7.8B FY2024 commitment total

The $7.8B figure is the FY2024 obligation aggregate on awards whose place of performance is Michigan District 03. The exact sum is $7,819,409,528.56. Obligation means a recorded commitment. It is not Treasury cash already paid, and it is not Michigan's state budget. The matching record count is 10,695.

First year and last year in the packet are both 2024. Do not treat $7.8B as a multi-year stack. Federal fiscal years begin on October 1. Later USAspending.gov corrections can revise $7,819,409,528.56 and the 10,695-award count. Until then, cite both as the FY2024 MI-03 place-of-performance stock. Anyone stacking a later fiscal year onto $7.8B is adding a number this packet does not contain.

10,695 awards beside $7.8B

10,695 awards share the MI-03 performance tag in FY2024. That count sits in a middle band: large enough that scanning every row by eye is impractical, and not so large that the file is only a six-figure action dump. The packet still does not invent a typical award from $7.8B and 10,695.

Keep 10,695 labeled as record volume. Repeat modifications add rows. The Michigan District 03 hub is the table. This packet does not rank the 3rd district against other Michigan seats. 10,695 awards carry the MI-03 performance code beside $7.8B — neither a thin file nor a six-figure action stock.

Performance geography, not a 3rd-district HQ map

Even for a numbered Michigan seat, the district field is still place of performance, not recipient headquarters. A contractor based in another Michigan district or another state can appear on MI-03 if the performance location is coded to the 3rd. A 3rd-district headquarters can post dollars to another district when performance is coded there. The 10,695 rows follow that field, not the contractor's legal address.

MI-03 dollars are tagged by where USAspending records performance, not by where a firm files its HQ. That split matters for $7.8B: work performed in the 3rd district can land here even if the vendor sits elsewhere. Work performed outside the 3rd does not enter this file merely because a headquarters is local. Recipient-location maps are a different cut from this $7.8B file.

MI-03 versus leftover codes 90 and 98

Michigan District 03 is a mapped House district. District 90 and district 98 are USAspending unspecified and non-voting bins. District 00 is the at-large code used in single-seat states; MI-03 is the numbered 3rd, not an at-large 00. MI-03 is not a leftover. Unspecified Michigan performance, if any, would live on a 90 page rather than inside this table. The $7.8B total uses the MI-03 place-of-performance code. 10,695 awards share that same numbered tag.

The Michigan state hub is the statewide obligation view. MI-03 is the 3rd-district place-of-performance page. They are related but not interchangeable. This packet does not quote a statewide Michigan total and does not rank the 3rd against other districts. Use the all-districts index to open other Michigan place-of-performance pages in the same format. Numbered seats and 90/98 leftovers are listed side by side in that index; they are not interchangeable geographies.

Obligations versus outlays

The $7.8B total is the obligation series. Outlays measure disbursements and can lag. SpendingVault does not recast MI-03 as cash paid. Mixing the two series makes the 3rd district look inconsistent when the files are measuring different events. An FY2024 obligation can fund later invoices.

Recipient-location maps, calendar-year totals, and state budget documents are other products. Match geography, year, and series before treating a disagreement with $7.8B as an error. Cite MI-03 as FY2024 USAspending.gov place-of-performance obligations of $7.8B on 10,695 awards. Do not mix that total into an outlay sheet or a headquarters extract.

How to quote Michigan's 3rd without mixing codes

A complete MI-03 citation names numbered District 03, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $7.8B, and 10,695 awards. Calling the code unspecified would confuse it with district 90. The Michigan District 03 hub is the table. The Michigan state page is the statewide roll-up. The all-districts index lists other Michigan seats in the same format.

The Michigan District 03 hub is the live table for MI-03. The Michigan page is the statewide obligation index. The all-districts index is the directory of other mapped seats and leftover codes. Quote $7.8B only with place of performance, federal FY2024, and the obligation series. 10,695 awards carry the MI-03 performance code beside $7.8B — neither a thin file nor a six-figure action stock.

Michigan District 03 can be quoted in one sentence: $7.8B in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations on 10,695 awards with MI-03 place of performance. The unrounded packet total is $7,819,409,528.56. That sentence already names the series (obligations), the year (federal FY2024), the geography (place of performance, not headquarters), and the district code (MI-03, a numbered 3rd seat rather than leftover 90/98 or at-large 00). SpendingVault does not add a unique-recipient count, an agency mix, or an outlay conversion. Readers who need the underlying rows should open the Michigan District 03 hub; readers who need statewide Michigan should open the Michigan page. Do not average $7.8B across 10,695 awards. Do not fold unspecified Michigan leftover dollars into $7.8B. First year and last year in this extract are both 2024.

Questions

How much federal spending is in Michigan District 03?

USAspending.gov shows $7.8B in FY2024 obligations with place of performance in Michigan District 03. The exact sum is $7,819,409,528.56. That is not an outlay total and not Michigan's state budget. The extract counts 10,695 awards for MI-03 in FY2024. The packet year range is FY2024 only.

Is Michigan District 03 an unspecified 90 bucket?

No. District 03 is a numbered voting House seat. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting buckets. District 00 is the at-large code; MI-03 is the numbered 3rd. The $7.8B total uses the MI-03 place-of-performance code. 10,695 awards share that same numbered tag.

Are Michigan 3rd-district dollars based on contractor headquarters?

No. The district is place of performance. Recipients based outside the 3rd can still appear on MI-03 if the performance location is coded to the 3rd. A 3rd-district headquarters can also map dollars to another district when performance is coded there. 10,695 awards follow the performance field, not HQ.

Is $7.8B in MI-03 already paid out?

No. $7.8B is an obligation sum from FY2024 award records. Outlays are a different series. SpendingVault does not convert the Michigan District 03 obligation total into Treasury outlays. Cite the figure with the obligation label, the FY2024 window, and MI-03 place of performance. 10,695 awards are the matching record count.