FY2024 federal obligations in Michigan District 06

Fifty thousand five hundred fifty-three actions

50,553 awards is a thick numbered-district file beside $9.1 billion. That volume is a count of award actions, including modifications that can each add a row. The packet does not publish unique Michigan vendors or an agency split. Do not treat 50,553 as 50,553 companies.

Do not divide $9.1 billion by 50,553. That average is not in the packet. Keep the dollar total and the row count as separate facts and use the Michigan District 06 hub for line-level review. A thick file usually means many smaller actions mixed with larger ones; the packet does not prove the mix.

A $9.1 billion FY2024 obligation file

The $9.1 billion total is the FY2024 obligation aggregate for awards whose place of performance is Michigan District 06. Obligation means a recorded commitment on a USAspending.gov award. It is not cash already leaving the Treasury, and it is not Michigan’s state operating budget.

First year and last year are both 2024. Federal fiscal year 2024 begins October 1. A calendar-year 2024 headline would be a different extract. Later USAspending corrections can move $9,141,044,476.57 and the 50,553-award count. Until then, cite both as the FY2024 MI-06 place-of-performance stock.

Performance location, not headquarters in the 6th

The district field is USAspending place of performance. Recipient headquarters do not assign MI-06. A vendor based in another Michigan district or another state can still appear in the $9.1 billion if performance is coded to the 6th. A 6th-district office can be absent when work is tagged elsewhere.

Michigan’s unspecified District 90 bucket, if present, is a different page. Numbered MI-06 rows do not migrate into that leftover bin on this hub. HQ directories of “District 06 contractors” will not match 50,553 performance-coded awards.

MI-06 is a voting seat

Michigan District 06 is a mapped House district. USAspending codes 90 and 98 are unspecified or non-voting buckets. This $9.1 billion is the numbered 6th-district performance total, not residual Michigan money that lacked a seat code.

The Michigan state hub rolls numbered districts and any leftover codes together. That statewide view will not equal $9,141,044,476.57. Use the Michigan District 06 page when the question is the 6th district’s FY2024 place-of-performance obligations.

Obligations versus outlays on the 6th-district hub

Cite $9.1 billion as obligations. Outlays measure disbursements and can lag the obligation date. SpendingVault does not recast the MI-06 total as cash paid inside the district in FY2024. Multi-year vehicles can obligate here and invoice later.

If another Michigan spending headline disagrees, check series (obligations vs outlays), geography (performance vs HQ), and year (federal FY2024 vs calendar 2024). This packet supplies only the obligation series for MI-06 place of performance.

Related Michigan geography on the same rules

The Michigan District 06 hub is the table for these 50,553 rows. The Michigan state page is the statewide roll-up. The all-districts index lists other Michigan numbered seats and any 90/98 buckets in the same format. This packet does not quote those other totals.

A complete MI-06 citation names numbered District 06, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $9.1 billion, and 50,553 awards. Calling the code unspecified would confuse it with district 90.

Michigan District 06 can be briefed as $9.1 billion in FY2024 obligations on 50,553 awards with numbered code MI-06. Treat 50,553 as an action stock, not unique vendors. Keep other Michigan numbered districts and any District 90 leftover on other rows. What this packet supplies is MI-06 place-of-performance commitments from USAspending.gov, not outlays, not a headquarters extract, and not a multi-year series. A headquarters in the 6th without an MI-06 tag does not enter this file.

Questions

How much did Michigan District 06 record in FY2024 federal spending?

USAspending.gov shows $9.1 billion in FY2024 obligations with Michigan District 06 place of performance. The exact sum is $9,141,044,476.57 across 50,553 awards. These are obligations, not outlays. The district field is performance location, not headquarters. The packet covers FY2024 only.

Does 50,553 awards mean 50,553 Michigan companies?

No. 50,553 is the FY2024 award-record count for the MI-06 place-of-performance code. Modifications can each add a row. The packet does not publish unique recipients. Those records sum to $9.1 billion in obligations. The Michigan District 06 hub is the table for the mix.

Is Michigan District 06 the same as district 90?

No. District 06 is a numbered voting House district. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting buckets. The $9.1 billion total is mapped to MI-06, not to those residual codes. Unmapped Michigan performance, if any, would sit on a 90-coded hub.

Are Michigan District 06 dollars based on contractor headquarters?

No. Only awards with MI-06 place of performance enter the $9.1 billion and 50,553-award totals. A headquarters in the 6th is neither required nor enough. Work coded to another Michigan district or another state appears elsewhere. Cite obligations, FY2024, and place of performance.