Michigan vs Virginia on USAspending
Michigan records $8.4B in federal obligations on USAspending.gov. Virginia records $110.8B. Michigan’s Census population is 10,140,459 against Virginia’s 8,811,195, so the larger industrial state trails by more than an order of magnitude on the federal award ledger. FY 2026 is the latest year. Totals are obligations, not Treasury outlays Michigan’s 416,538 awards and $175.18 per capita compare with Virginia’s 1,116,647 awards and $1,344.24 per capita. Automobile manufacturing leads Michigan’s mix.
Key figures
- Michigan $8.4B vs Virginia $110.8B in USAspending obligations.
- Michigan has more people (10,140,459 vs 8,811,195); per-capita $175.18 vs $1,344.24.
- Awards: 416,538 (MI) vs 1,116,647 (VA).
- Top industries: automobile manufacturing vs other computer related services.
- FY 2026 latest year; obligations, not outlays.
Autos on the federal books, not on Virginia’s scale
Michigan’s top industry is automobile manufacturing — the clearest auto-state signal in this comparison set. Virginia’s top industry is other computer related services. Cars versus IT services is the industry contrast. A reader who expects Detroit-area production to generate a USAspending stock in the same band as Virginia’s contractor corridor will not find that in the $8.4B versus $110.8B columns.
Federal awards are not the same as auto-industry output. USAspending.gov records government obligations, not vehicle sales. Michigan can remain an auto manufacturing center in the private economy while showing $8.4B in federal obligations. This page measures the federal ledger only.
Automobile manufacturing as a top federal industry is unique in this writer batch. It is also easy to over-read. USAspending.gov is not a census of vehicle output. It is a census of federal obligations. Michigan can remain the country’s auto-manufacturing reference point in private data while showing $8.4B on this ledger against Virginia’s $110.8B.
Award volume: 416,538 against 1,116,647
Michigan’s 416,538 awards are higher than several states with similar or larger dollar totals in this batch. Virginia still leads on actions at 1,116,647 and on dollars at $110.8B. Michigan is not award-poor; it is obligation-light relative to Virginia.
Award counts include modifications. They are not unique vendors and not cash. Use them next to the $8.4B and $110.8B stocks. FY 2026 is the latest year on the row, not a claim that either total is a single-year auto or IT appropriation.
Four hundred sixteen thousand five hundred thirty-eight Michigan awards are a thicker action file than Ohio’s 168,038 or Alabama’s 161,254, and still far below Virginia’s 1,116,647. Combined with 10,140,459 residents versus 8,811,195, Michigan is larger and busier on actions while remaining much smaller on dollars. Quote $8.4B next to the award count so the busy feed is not mistaken for a Virginia-class stock.
Per-capita $175.18 versus $1,344.24
Michigan’s spending per capita is $175.18. Virginia’s is $1,344.24. Dividing $8.4B by 10,140,459 residents produces a low-to-mid per-person figure; dividing $110.8B by 8,811,195 produces a high one. Michigan has more people and fewer recorded federal dollars, so per-capita moves against it twice.
Per-capita is not a factory wage and not a tax. It is obligations over Census population, useful so a 10-million-person state is not compared as if it had Virginia’s 8.8 million.
$175.18 per capita is $8.4B over 10,140,459 people. Virginia’s $1,344.24 is $110.8B over 8,811,195. The per-capita gap is the dollar gap plus Michigan’s larger denominator. FY 2026 is the latest year tag on the pair, not a single-year auto appropriation.
How to cite Michigan versus Virginia
Keep the auto manufacturing label attached to Michigan’s $8.4B so the pair is not just “small state versus large state.” Michigan is the larger state by population. The federal obligation stock is the small number. Cite USAspending.gov. Do not relabel obligations as outlays.
The Michigan and Virginia state pages hold agency and recipient tables. The comparison index lists other pairs, including other manufacturing leads (aircraft, engines, pharmaceuticals) if the research question is industry rather than this specific matchup.
No OEM names appear here because none appear in the packet. The industry fact is automobile manufacturing versus other computer related services. Agency and recipient tables are on the Michigan and Virginia state hubs. Cite USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
Limits
No OEM names, no plant-level dollars, no conversion of $8.4B into jobs. The packet’s facts are obligation totals, award counts, populations, per-capita figures, FY 2026, and the two top-industry descriptions.
Auto manufacturing on a federal ledger, not a production census
Michigan’s automobile manufacturing lead is the most recognizable goods label in this assigned batch. It still sits under $8.4B, 416,538 awards, 10,140,459 residents, and $175.18 per capita. Virginia’s other computer related services lead sits under $110.8B, 1,116,647 awards, 8,811,195 residents, and $1,344.24 per capita. Private vehicle output is a different dataset. Mixing it with these USAspending.gov obligation totals produces a fake auto-versus-Beltway score. This page stays on the packet facts. FY 2026 is the latest year. Outlays are not these numbers. Agency and recipient names are on the Michigan and Virginia state pages.
Questions
- Does Michigan get more federal spending than Virginia?
- No. Michigan shows $8.4B in USAspending obligations; Virginia shows $110.8B. Michigan has more residents, 10,140,459 versus 8,811,195. Totals are obligations, not Treasury outlays. FY 2026 is the latest year in the pair. Figures come from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending.gov award records. They are obligations — recorded commitments — not Treasury outlays, and FY 2026 is the latest year in the comparison.
- What is Michigan’s top federal industry compared with Virginia?
- Michigan’s top industry is automobile manufacturing. Virginia’s is other computer related services. Those NAICS descriptions are the leading slices in SpendingVault’s aggregates, not a full list of either state’s federal awards. Figures come from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending.gov award records. They are obligations — recorded commitments — not Treasury outlays, and FY 2026 is the latest year in the comparison.
- What is Michigan’s federal spending per capita vs Virginia?
- Michigan’s spending per capita is $175.18. Virginia’s is $1,344.24. Both divide USAspending obligations by Census population (10,140,459 and 8,811,195). Per-capita is a scaling statistic, not a payment to residents. Figures come from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending.gov award records. They are obligations — recorded commitments — not Treasury outlays, and FY 2026 is the latest year in the comparison.
- How many federal awards does Michigan have versus Virginia?
- Michigan has 416,538 awards in this aggregate; Virginia has 1,116,647. Award counts include contracts, grants, and modifications. Virginia also leads on dollars, $110.8B versus Michigan’s $8.4B. Figures come from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending.gov award records. They are obligations — recorded commitments — not Treasury outlays, and FY 2026 is the latest year in the comparison.
State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.