Skip to main content
← All guides

FY2024 USAspending in Minnesota District 01

Minnesota District 01 shows $7.3B in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations for place of performance in the 1st district. The exact sum is $7,290,786,209.78 across 33,320 awards. Those dollars are award commitments, not outlays. MN-01 is a numbered House seat, not an unspecified 90 code. MN-01 is a thicker Minnesota extract than the 5th or 8th: 33,320 awards sit next to $7.3B. SpendingVault indexes the rows on the Minnesota District 01 hub.

Key figures

  • Minnesota District 01 shows $7.3B in FY2024 place-of-performance obligations.
  • 33,320 awards are counted for MN-01 in the FY2024 place-of-performance extract.
  • District 01 is a numbered House seat, not a 90/98 unspecified bucket or an at-large 00.
  • Geography is place of performance, not recipient headquarters.
  • Cite $7.3B as obligations, not outlays.

The $7.3B FY2024 commitment total

The $7.3B figure is the FY2024 obligation aggregate on awards whose place of performance is Minnesota District 01. The exact sum is $7,290,786,209.78. Obligation means a recorded commitment. It is not Treasury cash already paid, and it is not Minnesota's state budget. The matching record count is 33,320.

First year and last year in the packet are both 2024. Do not treat $7.3B as a multi-year stack. Federal fiscal years begin on October 1. Later USAspending.gov corrections can revise $7,290,786,209.78 and the 33,320-award count. Until then, cite both as the FY2024 MN-01 place-of-performance stock. Anyone stacking a later fiscal year onto $7.3B is adding a number this packet does not contain.

33,320 awards in MN-01's FY2024 file

33,320 awards is the FY2024 record count for MN-01 place of performance. That is a high action count next to $7.3B, but it is still a row stock, not a headcount of Minnesota firms. The packet does not list unique recipients or an agency mix. Modifications and assistance actions can each add a line.

Do not treat 33,320 as 33,320 local companies. One recipient can appear many times. This page will not publish an average award as if USAspending printed one. Sort the Minnesota District 01 table by amount to see whether $7.3B is spread across many lines or concentrated. MN-01 is a thicker Minnesota extract than the 5th or 8th: 33,320 awards sit next to $7.3B.

Performance geography, not a 1st-district HQ map

Even for a numbered Minnesota seat, the district field is still place of performance, not recipient headquarters. A contractor based in another Minnesota district or another state can appear on MN-01 if the performance location is coded to the 1st. A 1st-district headquarters can post dollars to another district when performance is coded there. The 33,320 rows follow that field, not the contractor's legal address.

MN-01 dollars are tagged by where USAspending records performance, not by where a firm files its HQ. That split matters for $7.3B: work performed in the 1st district can land here even if the vendor sits elsewhere. Work performed outside the 1st does not enter this file merely because a headquarters is local. Recipient-location maps are a different cut from this $7.3B file.

MN-01 versus leftover codes 90 and 98

Minnesota District 01 is a mapped House district. District 90 and district 98 are USAspending unspecified and non-voting bins. District 00 is the at-large code used in single-seat states; MN-01 is the numbered 1st, not an at-large 00. MN-01 is not a leftover. Unspecified Minnesota performance, if any, would live on a 90 page rather than inside this table. The $7.3B total uses the MN-01 place-of-performance code. 33,320 awards share that same numbered tag.

The Minnesota state hub is the statewide obligation view. MN-01 is the 1st-district place-of-performance page. They are related but not interchangeable. This packet does not quote a statewide Minnesota total and does not rank the 1st against other districts. Use the all-districts index to open other Minnesota place-of-performance pages in the same format. Numbered seats and 90/98 leftovers are listed side by side in that index; they are not interchangeable geographies.

Obligations versus outlays

The $7.3B total is the obligation series. Outlays measure disbursements and can lag. SpendingVault does not recast MN-01 as cash paid. Mixing the two series makes the 1st district look inconsistent when the files are measuring different events. An FY2024 obligation can fund later invoices.

Recipient-location maps, calendar-year totals, and state budget documents are other products. Match geography, year, and series before treating a disagreement with $7.3B as an error. Cite MN-01 as FY2024 USAspending.gov place-of-performance obligations of $7.3B on 33,320 awards. Do not mix that total into an outlay sheet or a headquarters extract.

How to quote Minnesota's 1st without mixing codes

A complete MN-01 citation names numbered District 01, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $7.3B, and 33,320 awards. Calling the code unspecified would confuse it with district 90. The Minnesota District 01 hub is the table. The Minnesota state page is the statewide roll-up. The all-districts index lists other Minnesota seats in the same format.

The Minnesota District 01 hub is the live table for MN-01. The Minnesota page is the statewide obligation index. The all-districts index is the directory of other mapped seats and leftover codes. Quote $7.3B only with place of performance, federal FY2024, and the obligation series. MN-01 is a thicker Minnesota extract than the 5th or 8th: 33,320 awards sit next to $7.3B.

Minnesota District 01 can be quoted in one sentence: $7.3B in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations on 33,320 awards with MN-01 place of performance. The unrounded packet total is $7,290,786,209.78. That sentence already names the series (obligations), the year (federal FY2024), the geography (place of performance, not headquarters), and the district code (MN-01, a numbered 1st seat rather than leftover 90/98 or at-large 00). SpendingVault does not add a unique-recipient count, an agency mix, or an outlay conversion. Readers who need the underlying rows should open the Minnesota District 01 hub; readers who need statewide Minnesota should open the Minnesota page. Do not average $7.3B across 33,320 awards. Do not fold unspecified Minnesota leftover dollars into $7.3B. First year and last year in this extract are both 2024.

Questions

How much federal spending is in Minnesota District 01?
USAspending.gov shows $7.3B in FY2024 obligations with place of performance in Minnesota District 01. The exact sum is $7,290,786,209.78. That is not an outlay total and not Minnesota's state budget. The extract counts 33,320 awards for MN-01 in FY2024. The packet year range is FY2024 only.
Is Minnesota District 01 an unspecified 90 bucket?
No. District 01 is a numbered voting House seat. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting buckets. District 00 is the at-large code; MN-01 is the numbered 1st. The $7.3B total uses the MN-01 place-of-performance code. 33,320 awards share that same numbered tag.
Are Minnesota 1st-district dollars based on contractor headquarters?
No. The district is place of performance. Recipients based outside the 1st can still appear on MN-01 if the performance location is coded to the 1st. A 1st-district headquarters can also map dollars to another district when performance is coded there. 33,320 awards follow the performance field, not HQ.
Is $7.3B in MN-01 already paid out?
No. $7.3B is an obligation sum from FY2024 award records. Outlays are a different series. SpendingVault does not convert the Minnesota District 01 obligation total into Treasury outlays. Cite the figure with the obligation label, the FY2024 window, and MN-01 place of performance. 33,320 awards are the matching record count.

Congressional district is USAspending place-of-performance, not the recipient HQ. District 90/98 are USAspending unspecified/non-voting buckets.