USAspending.gov obligations in Minnesota District 05

$7.5B on USAspending.gov for the 5th district

Minnesota District 05 shows $7.5B in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations for place of performance. The indexed total is $7,514,429,380.91 across 8,218 awards. Those dollars are award commitments, not outlays. MN-05 is a numbered House seat, not an unspecified 90 code.

Until USAspending.gov revises the extract, $7.5B and 8,218 awards are the FY2024 MN-05 stock. The packet does not publish a prior-year comparison. Quote $7.5B with the obligation label and the FY2024 window. MN-05 is Minnesota's 5th seat, not the 1st or 8th: 8,218 awards and $7.5B stay on this performance code.

Record count for MN-05 place of performance

8,218 awards share the MN-05 performance tag in FY2024. That count sits in a middle band: large enough that scanning every row by eye is impractical, and not so large that the file is only a six-figure action dump. The packet still does not invent a typical award from $7.5B and 8,218.

Keep 8,218 labeled as record volume. Repeat modifications add rows. The Minnesota District 05 hub is the table. This packet does not rank the 5th district against other Minnesota seats. MN-05 is Minnesota's 5th seat, not the 1st or 8th: 8,218 awards and $7.5B stay on this performance code.

Keeping Minnesota District 05 off leftover bins

Keep Minnesota District 05 off leftover bins. A 90 or 98 Minnesota page, if it exists, is a different geography from the 5th district. MN-05 is numbered, not unspecified. $7.5B does not include those leftover codes. 8,218 awards are the mapped 5th action stock for FY2024.

The all-districts index lists MN-05 next to other Minnesota seats and leftover codes. Side-by-side listing does not make those geographies the same. Stay on the Minnesota District 05 hub for $7.5B. Statewide figures live on the Minnesota page, which this packet does not reprint.

The district field on Minnesota District 05

The Minnesota District 05 page is not a directory of firms headquartered in the 5th district. It is an obligation roll-up for awards whose performance location is coded MN-05. That is why a Minnesota company based outside District 05 can still appear, and why a local HQ can be absent. 8,218 awards follow the performance tag.

Place of performance is the geography this page uses. Recipient headquarters can sit in another Minnesota district or another state while the work is coded MN-05. The opposite pattern also appears: a District 05 address on the recipient file does not force every dollar onto this page. A recipient based outside the 5th can still appear among the 8,218 rows if place of performance is MN-05.

Outlays are a different Minnesota product

Do not brief $7.5B as money already spent in the 5th district. Brief it as FY2024 obligations on USAspending.gov with MN-05 place of performance. 8,218 awards are the matching action stock. Cash paid is a separate USAspending series this packet does not quote.

$7.5B is an obligation sum from FY2024 award records. Outlays are a different series. SpendingVault does not convert the Minnesota District 05 obligation total into Treasury outlays. If a Minnesota spending chart uses recipient location or calendar year 2024, it is not this page. Stay with place of performance, FY2024, and obligations when quoting $7.5B.

Using the Minnesota District 05 hub and related pages

Stay on MN-05 for the 5th district file. Other Minnesota mapped seats have their own hubs; this packet does not quote those other figures. The all-districts index lists other Minnesota seats and unspecified buckets in the same format. A headquarters in the 5th without a MN-05 tag does not enter this file.

The Minnesota District 05 hub is the live table for MN-05. The Minnesota page is the statewide obligation index. The all-districts index is the directory of other mapped seats and leftover codes. Quote $7.5B only with place of performance, federal FY2024, and the obligation series. MN-05 is Minnesota's 5th seat, not the 1st or 8th: 8,218 awards and $7.5B stay on this performance code.

Minnesota District 05 can be quoted in one sentence: $7.5B in FY2024 USAspending.gov obligations on 8,218 awards with MN-05 place of performance. The unrounded packet total is $7,514,429,380.91. That sentence already names the series (obligations), the year (federal FY2024), the geography (place of performance, not headquarters), and the district code (MN-05, a numbered 5th seat rather than leftover 90/98 or at-large 00). SpendingVault does not add a unique-recipient count, an agency mix, or an outlay conversion. Readers who need the underlying rows should open the Minnesota District 05 hub; readers who need statewide Minnesota should open the Minnesota page. Do not average $7.5B across 8,218 awards. Do not fold unspecified Minnesota leftover dollars into $7.5B. First year and last year in this extract are both 2024.

Questions

How should I cite Minnesota District 05 federal spending?

Cite numbered MN-05, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $7.5B, and 8,218 awards. The exact packet sum is $7,514,429,380.91. Do not call the geography unspecified, at-large, or cash paid. The Minnesota District 05 hub is the table for those rows.

Is District 05 the same as Minnesota's statewide total?

No. The Minnesota statewide hub is a different roll-up. MN-05 is one mapped performance district. Statewide Minnesota includes other numbered seats and any 90/98 buckets. This packet does not publish that statewide sum. $7.5B stays on District 05.

Do 8,218 awards equal unique Minnesota vendors?

No. 8,218 is an award-action count. One recipient can appear many times through modifications or multiple awards. The packet does not include a unique-vendor total, so this guide does not invent one. Keep 8,218 labeled as FY2024 record volume next to $7.5B.

Does $7.5B include later fiscal years?

No. First year and last year are both 2024. $7.5B is the FY2024 place-of-performance obligation total. Do not stack FY2025 or a calendar year onto $7,514,429,380.91. 8,218 awards match that same FY2024 window on MN-05.