Does Minnesota or Mississippi have more federal spending?

Mississippi leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $2.88B to Minnesota’s $2.74B. Mississippi also leads spending per capita, $115.31 versus $66.07, and awards, 233,003 versus 98,897. Minnesota has more residents (5,793,151 vs 2,943,045) and more FY2026 obligations ($382.8M vs $339.4M).

Why is Mississippi’s per-capita figure higher than Minnesota’s?

The packet reports $115.31 per capita in Mississippi on 2,943,045 residents and $66.07 in Minnesota on 5,793,151. Stacked stocks are $2.88B versus $2.74B. Award counts are 233,003 versus 98,897. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

What industries lead in Minnesota and Mississippi?

Minnesota’s top industry is pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds. Mississippi’s is ship building and repairing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $2.74B and $2.88B. Award counts are 98,897 in Minnesota and 233,003 in Mississippi.

Are Minnesota vs Mississippi figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $2.74B and $2.88B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $382.8M and $339.4M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($66.07 vs $115.31) uses Census population where present.

← All guides

Minnesota vs Mississippi on USAspending: $2.74B vs $2.88B

Mississippi’s USAspending.gov obligation stock is $2.88B; Minnesota’s is $2.74B. Minnesota has nearly twice the people—5,793,151 versus 2,943,045—while Mississippi posts the higher spending per capita, $115.31 versus $66.07, and more than twice the awards: 233,003 against 98,897. FY2026 obligations are $382.8M in Minnesota and $339.4M in Mississippi. Pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds lead Minnesota; ship building and repairing lead Mississippi. These totals are obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

Mississippi $2.88B vs Minnesota $2.74B in stacked USAspending obligations.
Mississippi per capita $115.31 vs Minnesota $66.07 on 2,943,045 vs 5,793,151 residents.
Awards: 98,897 vs 233,003; FY2026 $382.8M vs $339.4M.
Top industries: pharmacy benefit management in Minnesota; ship building in Mississippi.
Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Mississippi’s stock on half the people

Mississippi’s $2.88B exceeds Minnesota’s $2.74B on 2,943,045 residents against 5,793,151. Intensity follows: $115.31 per capita versus $66.07. Minnesota’s larger Census count does not produce the larger USAspending.gov stock.

Award volume also favors Mississippi, 233,003 versus 98,897. Mississippi’s file is denser in rows and slightly larger in stock. Minnesota’s 98,897 actions sit on $2.74B.

FY2026 is Minnesota’s recency win: $382.8M versus $339.4M. Cite USAspending.gov for the stacked stocks and the latest-year amounts.

Mississippi’s $2.88B, 233,003 awards, and $115.31 per capita on 2,943,045 residents are the dense-file side. Minnesota’s $2.74B, 98,897 awards, and $66.07 per capita on 5,793,151 residents are the larger-Census side. FY2026 of $382.8M versus $339.4M is Minnesota’s recency exception. All dollar cuts are USAspending.gov obligations.

Pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds versus ship building and repairing is mix. Outlays are not in the packet. Do not divide stocks by award counts. The comparison hub holds the tables.

Pharmacy administration versus ship building

Minnesota’s lead NAICS is pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds. Mississippi’s lead NAICS is ship building and repairing. Those peaks sit on $2.74B and $2.88B.

The 98,897 Minnesota awards and 233,003 Mississippi awards include many actions outside those labels. Use the Minnesota and Mississippi state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both peaks are USAspending.gov obligation mixes.

FY2026: $382.8M versus $339.4M

Fiscal year 2026 obligations are $382.8M in Minnesota and $339.4M in Mississippi. Recency does not preserve Mississippi’s stacked dollar lead. Treat the year as a recency slice of obligations, not as Treasury cash.

Do not divide $382.8M or $339.4M by 98,897 or 233,003 all-years awards. Spending per capita of $66.07 and $115.31 already sits beside Census counts of 5,793,151 and 2,943,045.

Half the people, a larger Mississippi stock

Mississippi’s $2.88B on 2,943,045 residents exceeds Minnesota’s $2.74B on 5,793,151. Intensity follows: $115.31 versus $66.07. Award volume follows Mississippi too: 233,003 versus 98,897. All dollar cuts are USAspending.gov obligations.

Ship building and repairing leads Mississippi. Pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds lead Minnesota. FY2026 of $339.4M versus $382.8M is Minnesota’s recency exception.

Outlays are not in the packet. Do not divide $2.88B by 233,003 or $2.74B by 98,897. Award count is a row total.

What Minnesota still leads

Minnesota leads population (5,793,151 vs 2,943,045) and FY2026 ($382.8M vs $339.4M). Mississippi leads stock, awards, and per capita. Read the packet as a split ranking, not a single winner.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Minnesota and Mississippi hubs hold agencies and recipients. Keep every dollar figure labeled as an obligation.

How to read Minnesota versus Mississippi

Read Mississippi first on stacked dollars ($2.88B vs $2.74B), spending per capita ($115.31 vs $66.07), and awards (233,003 vs 98,897). Read Minnesota first on population (5,793,151 vs 2,943,045) and FY2026 ($382.8M vs $339.4M). Note pharmacy benefit management versus ship building.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Minnesota and Mississippi hubs hold agencies and recipients. Outlays are a different series. Keep per-capita figures labeled as Census-based packet figures on USAspending.gov obligations.

Minnesota’s FY2026 of $382.8M versus Mississippi’s $339.4M is a recency exception on a pair Mississippi otherwise leads in stock, awards, and per capita. Cite USAspending.gov. Keep $2.74B and $2.88B labeled as obligations, not outlays.

Questions

Does Minnesota or Mississippi have more federal spending?: Mississippi leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations $2.88B to Minnesota’s $2.74B. Mississippi also leads spending per capita, $115.31 versus $66.07, and awards, 233,003 versus 98,897. Minnesota has more residents (5,793,151 vs 2,943,045) and more FY2026 obligations ($382.8M vs $339.4M).
Why is Mississippi’s per-capita figure higher than Minnesota’s?: The packet reports $115.31 per capita in Mississippi on 2,943,045 residents and $66.07 in Minnesota on 5,793,151. Stacked stocks are $2.88B versus $2.74B. Award counts are 233,003 versus 98,897. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
What industries lead in Minnesota and Mississippi?: Minnesota’s top industry is pharmacy benefit management and other third party administration of insurance and pension funds. Mississippi’s is ship building and repairing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $2.74B and $2.88B. Award counts are 98,897 in Minnesota and 233,003 in Mississippi.
Are Minnesota vs Mississippi figures Treasury outlays?: No. The $2.74B and $2.88B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $382.8M and $339.4M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($66.07 vs $115.31) uses Census population where present.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.