Does Mississippi or Nevada have more federal spending?

Mississippi leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations by a slim margin, $2.88B to Nevada’s $2.86B. Nevada leads spending per capita, $171.84 versus $115.31, on 3,267,467 residents against Mississippi’s 2,943,045. Mississippi has more awards (233,003 vs 45,442). FY2026 obligations are $339.4M in Mississippi and $561.5M in Nevada.

Why does Mississippi have more awards than Nevada?

The packet reports 233,003 awards in Mississippi and 45,442 in Nevada on stocks of $2.88B and $2.86B. Award count is a row total, not average size. Spending per capita is $115.31 versus $171.84. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

What industries lead in Mississippi and Nevada?

Mississippi’s top industry is ship building and repairing. Nevada’s is automobile manufacturing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $2.88B and $2.86B. Award counts are 233,003 in Mississippi and 45,442 in Nevada These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.

Are Mississippi vs Nevada figures Treasury outlays?

No. The $2.88B and $2.86B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $339.4M and $561.5M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($115.31 vs $171.84) uses Census population where present.

← All guides

Mississippi vs Nevada on USAspending: $2.88B vs $2.86B

Mississippi and Nevada are a stacked-dollar near-tie: $2.88B versus $2.86B in USAspending.gov obligations. Nevada has more people—3,267,467 versus 2,943,045—and the higher spending-per-capita reading, $171.84 versus $115.31. Mississippi’s award file is far larger: 233,003 actions against 45,442. FY2026 obligations are $339.4M in Mississippi and $561.5M in Nevada. Ship building and repairing leads Mississippi; automobile manufacturing leads Nevada. The series is obligations, not outlays.

Key figures

Mississippi $2.88B vs Nevada $2.86B in stacked USAspending obligations.
Nevada per capita $171.84 vs Mississippi $115.31 on 3,267,467 vs 2,943,045 residents.
Awards: 233,003 vs 45,442; FY2026 $339.4M vs $561.5M.
Top industries: ship building in Mississippi; automobile manufacturing in Nevada.
Figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not Treasury outlays.

Shipyards versus auto plants on a $2.8B band

Mississippi’s $2.88B and Nevada’s $2.86B sit in the same stock band. The industry peaks do not. Ship building and repairing leads Mississippi; automobile manufacturing leads Nevada. Those labels are first reads on each mix, not the whole file.

Award volume is Mississippi’s cut. 233,003 awards versus 45,442 means Mississippi’s file is dense in rows on a nearly identical stock. Nevada’s 45,442 actions sit on $2.86B beside the $171.84 per-capita reading.

FY2026 favors Nevada on recency: $561.5M versus $339.4M. Cite USAspending.gov for the stacked stocks and the latest-year amounts.

Mississippi’s 233,003 awards on $2.88B and Nevada’s 45,442 awards on $2.86B are the operational split under a near-tie stock. Ship building and repairing versus automobile manufacturing is the mix split. FY2026 of $339.4M versus $561.5M is the recency split. All dollar cuts are USAspending.gov obligations.

Spending per capita of $115.31 versus $171.84 uses Census counts of 2,943,045 and 3,267,467. Outlays are not listed. The comparison hub holds the tables. The Mississippi and Nevada hubs hold agencies and recipients.

Five times the awards, a cooler per-capita reading

Mississippi’s 233,003 awards against Nevada’s 45,442 is the row gap. Intensity runs the other way: $115.31 per capita versus $171.84 on Census counts of 2,943,045 versus 3,267,467. Dollars are nearly even: $2.88B versus $2.86B.

The 233,003 Mississippi awards and 45,442 Nevada awards include many actions outside ship building and automobile manufacturing. Use the Mississippi and Nevada state hubs for agencies and recipients. Both mixes are USAspending.gov obligations.

FY2026: $339.4M versus $561.5M

Fiscal year 2026 obligations are $339.4M in Mississippi and $561.5M in Nevada. Recency does not preserve Mississippi’s slim stacked dollar lead. Treat the year as a recency slice of obligations, not as Treasury cash.

Do not divide $339.4M or $561.5M by 233,003 or 45,442 all-years awards. Spending per capita of $115.31 and $171.84 already sits beside Census counts of 2,943,045 and 3,267,467.

Shipyards and auto plants on a $2.8B band

Mississippi’s $2.88B and Nevada’s $2.86B are a stacked near-tie. Ship building and repairing versus automobile manufacturing is not a near-tie on mix. Both peaks sit on USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are not listed.

Mississippi’s 233,003 awards dwarf Nevada’s 45,442. Nevada’s $171.84 per capita on 3,267,467 residents exceeds Mississippi’s $115.31 on 2,943,045. FY2026 of $339.4M versus $561.5M favors Nevada on recency.

Row density, intensity, and latest year split even when the stocks do not. Read those cuts as separate questions. Do not invent average award size from 233,003 or 45,442.

How to use the hubs after a near-tie headline

The comparison hub holds the side-by-side tables. The Mississippi and Nevada hubs hold agencies and recipients. Those pages stay inside the same obligation series.

Cite $2.88B and $2.86B as stacked stocks, $339.4M and $561.5M as FY2026, and $115.31 and $171.84 as Census-based per-capita figures. Cash outlays would be a different USAspending.gov download.

How to read Mississippi versus Nevada

Read Mississippi first on a slim stacked-dollar lead ($2.88B vs $2.86B) and awards (233,003 vs 45,442). Read Nevada first on population (3,267,467 vs 2,943,045), spending per capita ($171.84 vs $115.31), and FY2026 ($561.5M vs $339.4M). Note ship building versus automobile manufacturing.

The comparison hub holds the tables. The Mississippi and Nevada hubs hold agencies and recipients. Outlays are a different series. Keep per-capita figures labeled as Census-based packet figures on USAspending.gov obligations.

Questions

Does Mississippi or Nevada have more federal spending?: Mississippi leads stacked USAspending.gov obligations by a slim margin, $2.88B to Nevada’s $2.86B. Nevada leads spending per capita, $171.84 versus $115.31, on 3,267,467 residents against Mississippi’s 2,943,045. Mississippi has more awards (233,003 vs 45,442). FY2026 obligations are $339.4M in Mississippi and $561.5M in Nevada.
Why does Mississippi have more awards than Nevada?: The packet reports 233,003 awards in Mississippi and 45,442 in Nevada on stocks of $2.88B and $2.86B. Award count is a row total, not average size. Spending per capita is $115.31 versus $171.84. These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
What industries lead in Mississippi and Nevada?: Mississippi’s top industry is ship building and repairing. Nevada’s is automobile manufacturing. Those labels are the largest NAICS slices on $2.88B and $2.86B. Award counts are 233,003 in Mississippi and 45,442 in Nevada These figures are USAspending.gov obligations, not outlays.
Are Mississippi vs Nevada figures Treasury outlays?: No. The $2.88B and $2.86B totals, and FY2026 amounts of $339.4M and $561.5M, are USAspending.gov obligations. Outlays are cash payments and can lag. Spending per capita ($115.31 vs $171.84) uses Census population where present.

State comparison from SpendingVault aggregates of USAspending obligations. Per-capita uses Census population where present.