FY2024 federal obligations in North Carolina District 09

Twenty-eight thousand five hundred twenty-six actions

28,526 awards is a thick numbered-district file beside $9.4 billion. That volume is a count of award actions, including modifications that can each add a row. The packet does not publish unique North Carolina vendors or an agency split. Do not treat 28,526 as 28,526 companies.

Do not divide $9.4 billion by 28,526. That average is not in the packet. Keep the dollar total and the row count as separate facts and use the North Carolina District 09 hub for line-level review. A thick file usually means many smaller actions mixed with larger ones; the packet does not prove the mix.

A $9.4 billion FY2024 obligation file

The $9.4 billion total is the FY2024 obligation aggregate for awards whose place of performance is North Carolina District 09. Obligation means a recorded commitment on a USAspending.gov award. It is not cash already leaving the Treasury, and it is not North Carolina’s state operating budget.

First year and last year are both 2024. Federal fiscal year 2024 begins October 1. A calendar-year 2024 headline would be a different extract. Later USAspending corrections can move $9,446,023,244 and the 28,526-award count. Until then, cite both as the FY2024 NC-09 place-of-performance stock.

Performance location, not headquarters in the 9th

The district field is USAspending place of performance. Recipient headquarters do not assign NC-09. A vendor based in another North Carolina district or another state can still appear in the $9.4 billion if performance is coded to the 9th. A 9th-district office can be absent when work is tagged elsewhere.

North Carolina’s unspecified District 90 bucket, if present, is a different page. Numbered NC-09 rows do not migrate into that leftover bin on this hub. HQ directories of “District 09 contractors” will not match 28,526 performance-coded awards.

NC-09 is a voting seat

North Carolina District 09 is a mapped House district. USAspending codes 90 and 98 are unspecified or non-voting buckets. This $9.4 billion is the numbered 9th-district performance total, not residual North Carolina money that lacked a seat code.

The North Carolina state hub rolls numbered districts and any leftover codes together. That statewide view will not equal $9,446,023,244. Use the North Carolina District 09 page when the question is the 9th district’s FY2024 place-of-performance obligations.

Obligations versus outlays on the 9th-district hub

Cite $9.4 billion as obligations. Outlays measure disbursements and can lag the obligation date. SpendingVault does not recast the NC-09 total as cash paid inside the district in FY2024. Multi-year vehicles can obligate here and invoice later.

If another North Carolina spending headline disagrees, check series (obligations vs outlays), geography (performance vs HQ), and year (federal FY2024 vs calendar 2024). This packet supplies only the obligation series for NC-09 place of performance.

Related North Carolina geography

The North Carolina District 09 hub is the table for these 28,526 rows. The North Carolina state page is the statewide roll-up. The all-districts index lists other North Carolina numbered seats and any 90/98 buckets in the same format. This packet does not quote those other totals.

A complete NC-09 citation names numbered District 09, FY2024, USAspending.gov, place of performance, obligations, $9.4 billion, and 28,526 awards. Calling the code unspecified would confuse it with district 90.

North Carolina District 09 can be briefed as $9.4 billion in FY2024 obligations on 28,526 awards with numbered code NC-09. Treat 28,526 as an action stock, not unique vendors. What this packet supplies is NC-09 place-of-performance commitments from USAspending.gov, not outlays, not a headquarters extract, and not a multi-year series. A headquarters in the 9th without an NC-09 tag does not enter this file.

Questions

How much did North Carolina District 09 record in FY2024?

USAspending.gov shows $9.4 billion in FY2024 obligations with North Carolina District 09 place of performance. The exact sum is $9,446,023,244 across 28,526 awards. These are obligations, not outlays. The district field is performance location, not headquarters. The packet covers FY2024 only.

Does 28,526 awards mean 28,526 companies?

No. 28,526 is the FY2024 award-record count for the NC-09 place-of-performance code. Modifications can each add a row. The packet does not publish unique recipients. Those records sum to $9.4 billion in obligations. The North Carolina District 09 hub is the table for the mix.

Is North Carolina District 09 the same as district 90?

No. District 09 is a numbered voting House district. Codes 90 and 98 are USAspending unspecified or non-voting buckets. The $9.4 billion total is mapped to NC-09, not to those residual codes. Unmapped North Carolina performance, if any, would sit on a 90-coded hub.

Are District 09 dollars based on contractor headquarters?

No. Only awards with NC-09 place of performance enter the $9.4 billion and 28,526-award totals. A headquarters in the 9th is neither required nor enough. Work coded to another North Carolina district or another state appears elsewhere. Cite obligations, FY2024, and place of performance.